Most signature campaigns have in their list of rules that alts are not allowed to participate in the same SigComp. I've seen on the odd occasion where someone has justified having alts in different campaigns as it doesn't implicitly state alts can't join different SigComp's. They usually go sulking away when they get more negatives.
No, let me clear it. It's a bounty campaign with two different campaign one is for signature and the other one is for translation into local languages. Both accounts hasn't joined the same campaign rather it's split on different campaign. What I want to emphasize is why used two different accounts when you can do both if you really want transparency over it?
Guys, if I'm not mistaken, the merit transfer between accounts took place within six months of its introduction. The use of one telegram account more than once proves their connection. I think the abuse of the merit system is enough to leave negative feedback to both accounts. What do you think about that?
Yes you may leave a feedback over it, it's clearly on plain sight thay they abused it.
what is this 
Sorry for any disturbance that I cause here, including this post 
