Known alts of anyone: User generated - page 57.

DarkStar_

legendary

Activity: 2772

Merit: 3284

Quote from: Lutpin on January 26, 2016, 08:24:31 PM

Quote from: DarkStar_ on January 26, 2016, 07:59:40 PM

I see you have it marked as red trust. My red trust is from Muhammed Zakir, who is not on Default trust 2. I don't think this should count, as it doesn't give a "Warning, deal with extreme caution" tag.
If non DT counts, then kama and his alts should be marked as red (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=524836)
and probably others too, such as yourself. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=520313

Muhammed Zakir is DT3 in shorenas downlist. If I put my trust-settings to depth 3, you indeed get the tag.
As for others, kama hasn't got DT3 red trust, neither do I myself.

Quote from: Lutpin on January 25, 2016, 09:56:09 AM

Currently, connections which have one or more accounts with an overall trust below 0 are listed with "Red trust."
All else are listed with "None."
I did only consider feedback from DT2 and above, some of the alts got feedback from you/me pulling them below 0, those are still listed with "None." (Might add "DT3 red." or similar later).
Please, recheck everything.

Quote from: worhiper_-_ on January 26, 2016, 06:38:48 PM

As reported by badbear, mailmansDOGE is an alt of puzzel.me Both accounts have negative trust but you could have them in the list anyway.
Same for stellar69.
Also tried to sell stolen accounts. Using a new account
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9551211
also suspected alt with no negative trust

Will check it.

Oh. My bad, sorry.

Lutpin

copper member

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1874

Goodbye, Z.

Quote from: DarkStar_ on January 26, 2016, 07:59:40 PM

I see you have it marked as red trust. My red trust is from Muhammed Zakir, who is not on Default trust 2. I don't think this should count, as it doesn't give a "Warning, deal with extreme caution" tag.
If non DT counts, then kama and his alts should be marked as red (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=524836)
and probably others too, such as yourself. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=520313

Muhammed Zakir is DT3 in shorenas downlist. If I put my trust-settings to depth 3, you indeed get the tag.
As for others, kama hasn't got DT3 red trust, neither do I myself.

Quote from: Lutpin on January 25, 2016, 09:56:09 AM

Currently, connections which have one or more accounts with an overall trust below 0 are listed with "Red trust."
All else are listed with "None."
I did only consider feedback from DT2 and above, some of the alts got feedback from you/me pulling them below 0, those are still listed with "None." (Might add "DT3 red." or similar later).
Please, recheck everything.

Quote from: worhiper_-_ on January 26, 2016, 06:38:48 PM

As reported by badbear, mailmansDOGE is an alt of puzzel.me Both accounts have negative trust but you could have them in the list anyway.
Same for stellar69.
Also tried to sell stolen accounts. Using a new account
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9551211
also suspected alt with no negative trust

Will check it.

DarkStar_

legendary

Activity: 2772

Merit: 3284

Quote from: Lutpin on January 26, 2016, 06:30:01 PM

Quote from: DarkStar_ on January 26, 2016, 06:19:48 PM

Trying this again:
Message: This is DarkStar_ from bitcointalk.
Address: 1337rWE1dgoiLyqvWbxxrCm7x4jTP7adsz
Signature: G/xgVLmtytFcgcU+jMtCRHZb+M+KpP2XCqMjonQqZfPhL862m3b8aV9X9jfpvIqzdzwBAB3rksixT+SOdZoal5w=

That one checks out.
-> http://pastebin.com/fkFTKaD4

I see you have it marked as red trust.
My red trust is from Muhammed Zakir, who is not on Default trust. I don't think this should count, as it doesn't give a "Warning, deal with extreme caution" tag.
If non DT counts, then kama and his alts should be marked as red
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=524836)
and probably others too, such as yourself.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=520313

worhiper_-_

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

As reported by badbear, mailmansDOGE is an alt of puzzel.me Both accounts have negative trust but you could have them in the list anyway.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=331178

Same for stellar69

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=362287

Also tried to sell stolen accounts. Using a new account https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/tamatar-395188

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9551211

also suspected alt is

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/pudina-395221 with no negative trust

Lutpin

copper member

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1874

Goodbye, Z.

Quote from: DarkStar_ on January 26, 2016, 06:19:48 PM

Trying this again:
Message: This is DarkStar_ from bitcointalk.
Address: 1337rWE1dgoiLyqvWbxxrCm7x4jTP7adsz
Signature: G/xgVLmtytFcgcU+jMtCRHZb+M+KpP2XCqMjonQqZfPhL862m3b8aV9X9jfpvIqzdzwBAB3rksixT+SOdZoal5w=

That one checks out.
~~-> http://pastebin.com/fkFTKaD4~~ -> http://pastebin.com/GZNGZSvs
(Marked as DT3 red.)

DarkStar_

legendary

Activity: 2772

Merit: 3284

Trying this again:

Message: This is DarkStar_ from bitcointalk.
Address: 1337rWE1dgoiLyqvWbxxrCm7x4jTP7adsz
Signature: G/xgVLmtytFcgcU+jMtCRHZb+M+KpP2XCqMjonQqZfPhL862m3b8aV9X9jfpvIqzdzwBAB3rksixT+SOdZoal5w=

Verified it myself:

Now for sellavator:
PMS:

tx shown in the image: https://blockchain.info/tx/3a4ff366c2b72a2ee437d12a0c357fe6278ee98919be835729da4adc416c160f
Output address was 1CwNNNES1WcZfiM7pjAGcuRqUptxstSFah
This address is the one on Emerge's profile right now
https://archive.is/ssKK2

The address was also one where Emerge requested loan funds to.
https://archive.is/eiHtj

Lutpin

copper member

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1874

Goodbye, Z.

Quote from: DarkStar_ on January 25, 2016, 08:16:05 PM

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is DarkStar_'s alt on bitcointalk.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1337rWE1dgoiLyqvWbxxrCm7x4jTP7adsz
G4kwsuis4UYoeLJkzSH8FebplqcTBE123QPSHGOEg6rpd5BZLViokwi+GzFllg+Jub6mg801cQy67kbNmGuG3Zw=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Most of our transaction was done through PM. I can provide access to a trusted member if needed to prove this.

Couldn't verify the message with Electrum, anyone else abled to?
Can you please post a screenshot of your important PMs?

Quote from: gio3442 on January 25, 2016, 07:51:08 PM

Edit 2: Lutpin has received my message with the verification he asked. Awaiting for a response.

Posting the two PMs I got from gio3442, providing that he bought this account from his main worhiper_-_:

Quote from: tidus1097 on April 10, 2015, 08:31:17 AM

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I am gio3442
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1AjCxUe9oid2kZn9HZD8W2VbRfcgDfYHQc
HwHwr+sA1Jj+023uWY2PfKiB3Dyi9K9LCnlenehGRVnyNMX19XpID98bZnzSj/lq9M9T4hE+giQDEhKDyMuJp4Y=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

-> http://pastebin.com/Pm8P1hvE

Alaki

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Accounts connected -> matete, babs1975
Link/Proof -> here & here
Miscellaneous -> Signature/message verified in PM.

yahoo62278

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 4554

Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing

I confirm im the 3 accounts total mentioned here.

DarkStar_

legendary

Activity: 2772

Merit: 3284

Tavos was sold to me by sellavator

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is DarkStar_'s alt on bitcointalk.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1337rWE1dgoiLyqvWbxxrCm7x4jTP7adsz
G4kwsuis4UYoeLJkzSH8FebplqcTBE123QPSHGOEg6rpd5BZLViokwi+GzFllg+Jub6mg801cQy67kbNmGuG3Zw=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

The address used to sign is the one I staked with Tavos.
Blockchain ties as well with me: https://blockchain.info/address/1337rWE1dgoiLyqvWbxxrCm7x4jTP7adsz

sellavator is an alt of Emerge. The address that I paid to for the account is owned by Emerge.
This was my payment tx:
https://blockchain.info/tx/3a4ff366c2b72a2ee437d12a0c357fe6278ee98919be835729da4adc416c160f

Most of our transaction was done through PM. I can provide access to a trusted member if needed to prove this.

gio3442

full member

Activity: 179

Merit: 104

Quote from: Lutpin on January 25, 2016, 07:49:35 PM

Quote from: gio3442 on January 25, 2016, 07:45:24 PM

Hi friend, your assumption that I am SulphurXX is wrong. Please read your PM.

No need to requote the whole connection, and also it's not an assumption, I clearly connected your account to SulphurXX, it was at one point owned by this person.
Now for your feedback to be removed and this account deleted from the list, you would have to provide enough proof of the sale, as moneybat did earlier in this thread.

Ok, I will send you another PM.

Edit: pm sent

Edit 2: Lutpin has received my message with the verification he asked. Awaiting for a response.

Lutpin

copper member

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1874

Goodbye, Z.

Quote from: gio3442 on January 25, 2016, 07:45:24 PM

Hi friend, your assumption that I am SulphurXX is wrong. Please read your PM.

No need to requote the whole connection, and also it's not an assumption, I clearly connected your account to SulphurXX, it was at one point owned by this person.
Now for your feedback to be removed and this account deleted from the list, you would have to provide enough proof of the sale, as moneybat did earlier in this thread.

gio3442

full member

Activity: 179

Merit: 104

Lutpin

copper member

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1874

Goodbye, Z.

Quote from: steven0021 on January 25, 2016, 05:41:09 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on January 25, 2016, 05:35:50 PM

sellsrmember is an alt of yahoo62278.

sellsrmember was able to produce a signed message from one of yahoo's known addresses here that contained the date of the signed message

and pokerowned, looks like. not sure if that's good enough, though.

pokerowned signs a message from 1Levzun9S2CY7chQZUcTWNoQfYp9CV246v here:

Quote from: pokerowned on September 03, 2015, 04:52:23 PM

1Levzun9S2CY7chQZUcTWNoQfYp9CV246v

Message:
requesting a loan from Magic8Ball on 9/3/2015 with account as collateral

Signature:
H0d/XAKYvmDiSX9ZZFfUCYZrtug2ZFY6Musv4IrV8GngDRkd9J8INFH3QduYE5oyPMCj1fBHr+Wj0AfyacxxUCA=

yahoo62278 signs from the same address here:

Quote from: yahoo62278 on January 25, 2016, 09:43:20 AM

This address is from june 2015 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1084422.msg11568570#msg11568570
Address:
1Levzun9S2CY7chQZUcTWNoQfYp9CV246v
Message:
Yahoo verifying yet again address #5 January 25 2016
Signature:
H2FaqzliGfgoC1ylM73BzVALnDqNnl2IpMGs/fdbVxYUKm2by42ji9jwS/uWfLBEmIkp2V7VRVgm80lnYjj2z5c=

That indeed is enough.

Same goes for sellsrmember:

Quote from: sellsrmember on January 24, 2016, 06:18:43 PM

Address:
1YahooAcNav93Wkt2Dpx6KdfBYcNZXCib
Message:
This is yahoo, my acct was hacked on 1/24/15 do not trade with the user
Signature:
G1tKwpUoHuMW/kemgsXMggZ7CylI2Vp0B4drA5bQ9cXKOEzkfym7Mz6leNjauDLf7WaF6tpl3zlOe+GHtNzYfzk=

Quote from: yahoo62278 on January 25, 2016, 09:43:20 AM

Here is a thread from well over a year ago with my 1yahoo address and a signed message from that address. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9781032
Address:
1YahooAcNav93Wkt2Dpx6KdfBYcNZXCib
Message:
January 25 2016 i am verifying i control my account
Signature:
HOfBdFzMrFFGiKLQMVarPUrXSY8AhjL+n7J95485ZS1wN3UV3hxo1sncAMxa0DfS2EazeNZ5dZ62Ob0a8ZtSs/c=

-> http://pastebin.com/qDZ5vTF9

steven0021

hero member

Activity: 629

Merit: 501

Experientia docet

Quote from: Quickseller on January 25, 2016, 05:35:50 PM

sellsrmember is an alt of yahoo62278.

sellsrmember was able to produce a signed message from one of yahoo's known addresses here that contained the date of the signed message

and pokerowned, looks like. not sure if that's good enough, though.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

sellsrmember is an alt of yahoo62278.

sellsrmember was able to produce a signed message from one of yahoo's known addresses here that contained the date of the signed message

Lutpin

copper member

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1874

Goodbye, Z.

Quote from: pjsonowal on January 25, 2016, 03:28:50 PM

Please add up my another alt. I bought up

Avirunes [UID:175302]

Quote from: Avirunes on January 25, 2016, 04:12:37 PM

This is my bitcoin address:- 1oooTXKUgGbLhVTG4zZ4FJi71Xzk6vijL

Code:

Address:
1oooTXKUgGbLhVTG4zZ4FJi71Xzk6vijL

Message:
This address belongs to Avirunes(a.k.a pjsonowal)

Signature:
Gzbtwpd1ZMv5x2gqJ5GrgUGHKXmq1opIMxpR4SFz7+PkShR0e42FWC6yh+b/qTQL2W/2XuREiiONfjuh7jalMMk=

-> http://pastebin.com/4G8wVL0g

pjsonowal

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Please add up my another alt. I bought up

Avirunes [UID:175302]

Lutpin

copper member

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1874

Goodbye, Z.

Quote from: mexxer-2 on January 25, 2016, 09:51:58 AM

BTW I think we should also have a column, if one of the alts have negative trust. So that all of them can be appropriately tagged, and reference would be easier.

Absolutely, I will add that into my next pastebin.

Added the column -> http://pastebin.com/R3qG9vA6

Currently, connections which have one or more accounts with an overall trust below 0 are listed with "Red trust."
All else are listed with "None."
I did only consider feedback from DT2 and above, some of the alts got feedback from you/me pulling them below 0, those are still listed with "None." (Might add "DT3 red." or similar later).
Please, recheck everything.

mexxer-2

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 1005

4 Mana 7/7

Quote from: Lutpin on January 25, 2016, 09:50:04 AM

paka and UnknownUsername are alts, they both use the address 1R3gsBa1GAeXfQiASQductaaQP5hKv2ki to enroll into signature campaigns.

BTW I think we should also have a column, if one of the alts have negative trust. So that all of them can be appropriately tagged, and reference would be easier.

Topic: Known alts of anyone: User generated - page 57. (Read 124989 times)