Koshgel Sold Account - Abusing Trust System

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 2008

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: eddie13 on July 10, 2019, 11:17:40 PM

I thought the koshgel account was wrecked a long time ago Huh

Yep, this is really a non issue any way you slice it: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/account-koshgel-is-probably-compromised-2772387

Quote from: nutildah on July 11, 2019, 12:17:07 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on July 10, 2019, 06:26:58 PM

This person decided that the trust system is a tool to punish people for disagreeing with them. Why should I give them a courtesy they don't give me? I didn't go looking for him, he found me. You are the last person who should be commenting on this. Furthermore, if this was something I did exclusively for retaliation you would have been flagged a long time ago hypocrite. Thanks for proving my point salty boy.

Because you shouldn't let it bother you, but you let everything bother you. You missed my point entirely about retaliatory feedback. This is why you are unfit for DT.

You did try to get me tagged already and you failed spectacularly. What happened instead was you were kicked off DT1 again and racked up even more exclusions thereafter. Now its your turn to cry about this being a "politburo" system, and that's why nobody likes you. Historically speaking this is your next go-to trick that you pull out of your bag of about 2 or 3 tricks.

You give yourself too much credit. I don't care what twisted semantics you intended. My intent is transparent while yours is clearly and transparently butthurt. You think those exclusions were over you? That is cute. Also if I wanted you tagged I would just do it and all your "pals" would say nothing because they tag people for the same thing all the time, and defending you would make them look like huge hypocrites.

"Now its your turn to cry about this being a "politburo" system" what in the fuck are you even rambling about? This statement makes zero sense. I suggest you focus on your own affairs, because this thing you think you are doing to me is only making you look the ass. I assure you at worst you are low level entertainment for me.

nutildah

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 8114

Quote from: TECSHARE on July 10, 2019, 06:26:58 PM

This person decided that the trust system is a tool to punish people for disagreeing with them. Why should I give them a courtesy they don't give me? I didn't go looking for him, he found me. You are the last person who should be commenting on this. Furthermore, if this was something I did exclusively for retaliation you would have been flagged a long time ago hypocrite. Thanks for proving my point salty boy.

Because you shouldn't let it bother you, but you let everything bother you. You missed my point entirely about retaliatory feedback. This is why you are unfit for DT.

You did try to get me tagged already and you failed spectacularly. What happened instead was you were kicked off DT1 again and racked up even more exclusions thereafter. Now its your turn to cry about this being a "politburo" system, and that's why nobody likes you. Historically speaking this is your next go-to trick that you pull out of your bag of about 2 or 3 tricks.

eddie13

legendary

Activity: 2296

Merit: 2262

BTC or BUST

I thought the koshgel account was wrecked a long time ago Huh

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 2008

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: nutildah on July 10, 2019, 08:40:38 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on July 07, 2019, 03:14:57 PM

I see, so I oppose tagging people based on suspicions, and tag one person for admittedly selling their account that is hypocrisy. You advocate tagging people based on suspicions shotgun style, but not your pal Nutilduhh for publicly posting their account for sale, and I am the hypocrite? MMmkay.

The point is you don't give a shit about account sales unless if you can use it as a weapon against somebody who you feel slighted you. You dredged up a 3 year old incident 15 minutes after I caused you some sort of grief on P&S, and then you expect people to believe the two events are unrelated. You obviously wouldn't give a shit about this person's account sales if they hadn't red trusted you.

I've received plenty of unjust red feedbacks but I don't feel the need to investigate each account and post about it in Reputation, nor do I feel the need to leave them a retaliatory feedback.

I don't like account sales, but I also don't think it is my business to police the forum for things I don't like or are not against the rules. So because I don't run around acting like a wanna be mall cop I don't get to use the trust system to engage with people who directly engage with me? Nice logic nutilduhhh.

This person decided that the trust system is a tool to punish people for disagreeing with them. Why should I give them a courtesy they don't give me? I didn't go looking for him, he found me. You are the last person who should be commenting on this. Furthermore, if this was something I did exclusively for retaliation you would have been flagged a long time ago hypocrite. Thanks for proving my point salty boy.

nutildah

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 8114

Quote from: TECSHARE on July 07, 2019, 03:14:57 PM

I see, so I oppose tagging people based on suspicions, and tag one person for admittedly selling their account that is hypocrisy. You advocate tagging people based on suspicions shotgun style, but not your pal Nutilduhh for publicly posting their account for sale, and I am the hypocrite? MMmkay.

The point is you don't give a shit about account sales unless if you can use it as a weapon against somebody who you feel slighted you. You dredged up a 3 year old incident 15 minutes after I caused you some sort of grief on P&S, and then you expect people to believe the two events are unrelated. You obviously wouldn't give a shit about this person's account sales if they hadn't red trusted you.

I've received plenty of unjust red feedbacks but I don't feel the need to investigate each account and post about it in Reputation, nor do I feel the need to leave them a retaliatory feedback.

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 2008

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: suchmoon on July 07, 2019, 03:39:41 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on July 07, 2019, 03:14:57 PM

Doxing now huh?

That's Quicksy's MO. If you weren't busy making shit up you would have noticed that the post you're replying to was addressed to him.

Oh, I see, it was my fault you were off topic and conflating his actions with mine. My mistake.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: TECSHARE on July 07, 2019, 03:14:57 PM

Doxing now huh?

That's Quicksy's MO. If you weren't busy making shit up you would have noticed that the post you're replying to was addressed to him.

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 2008

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: suchmoon on July 07, 2019, 02:50:46 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on July 07, 2019, 01:58:49 PM

So in other words

Uhm... nope.

If you insist on whataboutism and hypocrisy then we shall also look at your (and TECSHARE's) opposition to tagging for account sales, except when it suits you (or him). I don't know many other users who would resort to doxing and trust system abuse due to disagreements in P&S so you two dipshits really stand out from the crowd here.

I see, so I oppose tagging people based on suspicions, and tag one person for admittedly selling their account that is hypocrisy. You advocate tagging people based on suspicions shotgun style, but not your pal Nutilduhh for publicly posting their account for sale, and I am the hypocrite? MMmkay.

Doxing now huh? The list of horse shit grows by the minute. Are you sure you aren't a horse instead of a baboon?

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: Quickseller on July 07, 2019, 01:58:49 PM

So in other words

Uhm... nope.

If you insist on whataboutism and hypocrisy then we shall also look at your (and TECSHARE's) opposition to tagging for account sales, except when it suits you (or him). I don't know many other users who would resort to doxing and trust system abuse due to disagreements in P&S so you two dipshits really stand out from the crowd here.

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 2008

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: suchmoon on July 07, 2019, 01:34:27 PM

I'm totally not sorry that my pointing out of your petty retaliatory use of the trust system seems like punishment to you. If the shoe fits...

I don't tag anyone on a regular basis, because I don't think this forum needs wanna be internet mall cops. I also don't tag people for disagreeing with me. He left me a negative rating because he was upset with my disagreement with him, at which point I discovered his thread openly advertising his account for sale, then I tagged him for it, including a reference from his own mouth. I never would have bothered looking if he had not abused the trust system to begin with, however that is not the same as tagging him for disagreeing with me. Your endless act of "accuse your opponents of the crimes you yourself are guilty of" never ceases to be entertaining Suchbaboon. Keep it up.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2371

Quote from: suchmoon on July 07, 2019, 08:43:20 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on July 07, 2019, 02:45:04 AM

Quote from: suchmoon on July 06, 2019, 07:18:55 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on July 06, 2019, 06:29:32 PM

Perhaps you could explain exactly how he is abusing the trust system?

Perhaps I could but TECSHARE will delete it again so I'm not gonna bother. Hopefully this retaliatory feedback will cement his exclusion from DT1.

I saw the post he deleted and it is exactly the same as this post.

I don't think you can explain how TECSHARE is abusing the trust system because his rating is very similar to those of many people on your direct trust list, and of those whom you support on a regular basis.

I don't think whataboutism and lying is helping TECSHARE here, but it's possible that logic works differently for thin-skinned narcissists such as him and yourself.

So in other words, your argument boils down to:
"Rules for thee but not for me"

The proof Koshgel is sold is in the OP. The OP is unedited, so it was there when you first posted.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: TECSHARE on July 07, 2019, 01:21:30 PM

So what is your argument, that you don't support tagging account sellers on a regular basis? "whataboutism" in this case can also be described as hypocrisy.

Do you tag account sellers on a regular basis and with proper proof? Or do you just dig something up in retaliation when someone disagrees with out in P&S, like e.g. with nutildah and now koshgel?

To be fair, for all I know koshgel is a sold account (proof would be nice tho) but it's quite clear to me that your red tag is retaliatory and your judgement can't be trusted.

Quote from: TECSHARE on July 06, 2019, 08:03:07 PM

Normally I would just delete it because this is just another pathetic attempt at retribution for calling out you and your brown nose clan, but I think I am going to leave it up because it is a great example of your hypocritical double standards and desperate compulsion to punish anyone who is critical of you and yours. You keep flailing, it is a good look for you.

I'm totally not sorry that my pointing out of your petty retaliatory use of the trust system seems like punishment to you. If the shoe fits...

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 2008

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: suchmoon on July 07, 2019, 08:43:20 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on July 07, 2019, 02:45:04 AM

Quote from: suchmoon on July 06, 2019, 07:18:55 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on July 06, 2019, 06:29:32 PM

Perhaps you could explain exactly how he is abusing the trust system?

Perhaps I could but TECSHARE will delete it again so I'm not gonna bother. Hopefully this retaliatory feedback will cement his exclusion from DT1.

I saw the post he deleted and it is exactly the same as this post.

I don't think you can explain how TECSHARE is abusing the trust system because his rating is very similar to those of many people on your direct trust list, and of those whom you support on a regular basis.

I don't think whataboutism and lying is helping TECSHARE here, but it's possible that logic works differently for thin-skinned narcissists such as him and yourself.

So what is your argument, that you don't support tagging account sellers on a regular basis? "whataboutism" in this case can also be described as hypocrisy.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: Quickseller on July 07, 2019, 02:45:04 AM

Quote from: suchmoon on July 06, 2019, 07:18:55 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on July 06, 2019, 06:29:32 PM

Perhaps you could explain exactly how he is abusing the trust system?

Perhaps I could but TECSHARE will delete it again so I'm not gonna bother. Hopefully this retaliatory feedback will cement his exclusion from DT1.

I saw the post he deleted and it is exactly the same as this post.

I don't think you can explain how TECSHARE is abusing the trust system because his rating is very similar to those of many people on your direct trust list, and of those whom you support on a regular basis.

I don't think whataboutism and lying is helping TECSHARE here, but it's possible that logic works differently for thin-skinned narcissists such as him and yourself.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2371

Quote from: suchmoon on July 06, 2019, 07:18:55 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on July 06, 2019, 06:29:32 PM

Perhaps you could explain exactly how he is abusing the trust system?

Perhaps I could but TECSHARE will delete it again so I'm not gonna bother. Hopefully this retaliatory feedback will cement his exclusion from DT1.

I saw the post he deleted and it is exactly the same as this post.

I don't think you can explain how TECSHARE is abusing the trust system because his rating is very similar to those of many people on your direct trust list, and of those whom you support on a regular basis.

xolxol

member

Activity: 241

Merit: 98

Quote from: suchmoon on July 06, 2019, 05:53:25 PM

So your solution to trust system abuse is to abuse the trust system? Roll Eyes

do you mean your group's solution?pathetic douche twat.

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 2008

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: suchmoon on July 06, 2019, 07:18:55 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on July 06, 2019, 06:29:32 PM

Perhaps you could explain exactly how he is abusing the trust system?

Perhaps I could but TECSHARE will delete it again so I'm not gonna bother. Hopefully this retaliatory feedback will cement his exclusion from DT1.

Normally I would just delete it because this is just another pathetic attempt at retribution for calling out you and your brown nose clan, but I think I am going to leave it up because it is a great example of your hypocritical double standards and desperate compulsion to punish anyone who is critical of you and yours. You keep flailing, it is a good look for you.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: Quickseller on July 06, 2019, 06:29:32 PM

Perhaps you could explain exactly how he is abusing the trust system?

Perhaps I could but TECSHARE will delete it again so I'm not gonna bother. Hopefully this retaliatory feedback will cement his exclusion from DT1.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2371

Quote from: suchmoon on July 06, 2019, 05:53:25 PM

So your solution to trust system abuse is to abuse the trust system? Roll Eyes

The rating that TECSHARE left says:

Quote

Sold account. Most likely an alt of a more well known member. Abusing trust system.

I see a number of people on your trust list who have left trust for very similar reasons, in masse.

Perhaps you could explain exactly how he is abusing the trust system?

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

So your solution to trust system abuse is to abuse the trust system? Roll Eyes

Topic: Koshgel Sold Account - Abusing Trust System (Read 611 times)