Topic: Kryptosino.com - The #1 Shiba Casino - page 6. (Read 2003 times)

They maybe relaunch their marketing with a new team or new member as a contact point for marketing. From some give information in previous posts, their business started in 2021 and your initial review on them is in 2022. It's up to 2 or 3 years and now they're back with a signature campaign as I saw several days ago.

Do they have an announcement thread in bitcointalk in 2021 or 2022?

It is always nice to have a new competitor in the crypto casino arena,this is only beneficial to all of us gamblers that we will make sure we get the best deal,the more offering from different casinos will even make those who think we are already at the top to think again or they will lose customers to the newly established casinos which I am sure will offer quite some goodies at their beginning,I think Kryptosino will be one of them,offering great deals and the first one without wagering requirements is a huge one as to speak of for a beginning.

So, here`s a quick update: I looked into why we stopped promoting Kryptosino and also had a chat with our "new" contact person.

We terminated them mainly because not only did we have to chase them for payments (never a good sign when even affiliates need to chase), but they also became unresponsive at some point. No matter what, we wouldn`t hear back from them.

After my chat with them earlier today, I decided to revisit them and update our review accordingly - for what it`s worth, we liked Kryptosino even when we first checked them out.

I just successfully registered on the site as a test, and I am logged in right now. Can you try clearing your cache and trying again? I know they have some country restrictions but the warning message on that should show the exact error.

- Jay -

I don’t know if it’s just me but the signup option is not working - I visited before to check the ui and also their TOS and today I wanted to register an account and try it out but I can’t get past the home page.

If I click on “login” it takes me to the correct page but on clicking “sign up” it takes me back to the homepage - I’d like someone to check if it’s just me or a general issue so that I can know what to do next (if I should change my device/ISP or just wait for it to be fixed).

Welcome to the forum, i hope you'll stay active on this thread and respond to questions from users, it will help you build a better and stronger brand in the community. Checking your website, i can see you offer sports betting, which is cool as there is quite a lot of demand for it in online casinos. Prolly you should add images to your OP, at least for some aesthetics, welcome once again.

Welcome to the Bitcoin forum.
About your casino site, I just saw it today and haven't tried to access it. But I'm interested in the topic title because it mentions shiba casino.
Since you are already a copper member, it would be great if you create a unique service design to display here.
If you want your casino to get a wide response, contact @Hhampuz to work together to promote your casino.
Visit his profile, see how professional he is in working.

From what I understand this could be the case, but it seems that €100 is very small to require casinos to have mandatory KYC.

But I guess this is the new thing now for casinos, however, I just say that there are still some casinos that doesn't require KYC for at least that €100 withdrawal.

We will see that there is a signature campaign being launch so welcome and best of luck to this new casinos.

Welcome to the forum.
Just had a short first look over the site.
The casino still looks a bit rough (guess it's still very early in the life of the site) but the sports book section looks very solid already with odds that are similar to the other bigger crypto casino brands.

A few tweaks here and there and I think this will work.

1 question, any plan to bring some sort of "VIP transfer program" for players that have a high level somewhere else?
It's always rough to start at a new site from the total bottom, that's why some other casino offer that to bring in higher wagering people that have a good history somewhere else.

In the first place, welcome to the forum anyway. I actually took a look at your website, and in fairness, the graphics you have on your gambling platform are good, but the games you have on your casino platform are a bit passé for my taste.

Maybe I'll try to play there later so I can see and learn about the other games you have that your gamblers will enjoy there. So I hope you can improve your platform even more in the future.

Thank you, that was definitely not intentional. I was initially telling them to get a copper membership, so I must have made a mistake with the link and that of the service thread.

It's fixed now.

Hi was it intentional? but this link doesn't lead to your service thread. I hope it's an error, when clicked it goes to the page where copper membership is purchased. You can adjust it for future purposes. Thanks.

Of course - since the signature campaign has been launched, I am sure there will be a lot of interest in increasing the traffic of this casino including the increase in the number of customers. The sportsbook is a great option to continue to develop considering that most football has just started a new season - so this is the best time to attract the attention of many new customers.

One of the most interesting bonuses is - users are not required to reach a certain betting limit to get the bonus which is then mentioned like this:

The amount is  really that small for regular KYCing for a withdrawal of just about $100. Normally if KYC wasn't mandatory very a few people would be willing to pass it, how much more having to pass KYC regularly for every time you want to make a withdraw as low as $100.. This policy can deter interested gamblers with deep pocket from testing the casino.
Since they have launched a signature campaign in the forum it means they are ready to engage with the community but their  first start of engagement should be by revisiting some of their policies that the forum members are not finding interesting and make a few considerable readjustments.

Welcome to the forum, mate. I can already see that you guys have already launched a signature campaign to promote your brand. This definitely will help you to build your trust among all the forum members here. The ANN thread is well equipped with all the major information, but the design can surely be improved, according to me. The welcome bonus looks promising, and that’s what all the members want from a gambling casino. It will definitely drive more attention towards your casino. I checked the site from the mobile device, and it works fine. I will update the feedback/review by checking the site through the desktop version.

If I am not mistaken, this is a new casino right, there was never a time it was advisable to deposit a large sum of money in to a supposedly new casino, regardless of their policies, whether it be favorable for gamblers or not, it's best to start playing on a new casino with small amount of money first, and then increase a little on monthly basis depending on how well the you as a gambler enjoy the casino's services.
This is an efficient and effective way to safeguard one's funds from being stuck in the casino as we seen on several cases there a gambler deposits a huge sum of money to a casino, only to later discover that to withdraw back all of those money, the gambler will have to request for withdrawal monthly for over six months.

So, it is actually a bad gambling habit to go depositing s huge sum of money into a new casino whose terms and conditions aren't clear yet.

There are times when they allow the withdrawal of that amount without KYC - some accounts in bcgame and stake can withdraw up to $5000+ without triggering any alert on their system - most times it’s due to suspicious activity that were detected in that account.

In casino like this it will become very hard for them to see any high roller because of this type of restriction ranging from the daily/weekly limit to the kyc policy - they should probably do something about this or people will start to look at them as a very small casino not worthy of large deposits.

This means that the KYC policy of the casino is strict. €100 is not big enough to require KYC imo.

[/quote]
That is another red spot right there because €100 is still too small and amount to require kyc, it should have been better if the team just demands for kyc outrightly on registration point because there is nothing different between having to to kyc before you deposits and making a minimum amount to kyc in the benchmark of €100, this is likely going to wey a lot of gamblers down from registering in this casinos, although as a casino making their presence here on Bitcointalk will force them to have a lot of changes on their operation and a few things have already being pointed out for the team and let see how their work to retify a few things that will set things straight for the ops as time goes on.
So I can say they are welcome to the forum hoping that the kyc limit get increased to the standard accepted for kyc such as $5000 from many reputable casinos like stake and BC. Game Duelbit and the rest of the other known casinos that we have around the Forum and fine to say that we are excited to have them since the cryptocurrency casinos scene is getting expanded at daily levels and seeing platform coming to Bitcointalk show's that we are recognizing crypto casinos and let see how the go about building a reputation for themselves.

Can you disclose here what issue you encounter to this casino to temporarily warn user that will try this casino. I’m sure there’s always some gullible players that will check out new casino just to try its feature.

I always trust your judgement when it comes to casino review since most of the time its correct. Just give us a hint on the intensity of your findings.

We stopped promoting them quite a while ago because of several issues - usually, our gut feeling is right.

They reached out to me a day ago and I will have a chat with them soon - it looks like they kind of "rebranded" but the question is if I feel they can be recommended (again).