KWH IS USING TRUST INCORRECTLY? GIVE YOUR OPINION! - page 2.

Lutpin

copper member

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1874

Goodbye, Z.

Quote from: poptok1 on May 10, 2016, 02:05:19 PM

IMO KWH's ratting is written with poor English

Read it again, understand the structure of the comment, while it's written shortly and compressed, there's nothing wrong with the language he uses.
Besides that, that shouldn't be the base upon valuing trust ratings.
(Your rating is written in bad english, it's invalid and what you say is wrong./That user has perfect, good english, he surely can't be lying about what he says.)

Quote from: poptok1 on May 10, 2016, 02:05:19 PM

it will be negligible very soon if you satay fair with others, of course

While the others (with which op 'stood fair') are not on DT, KWH is.
As a result, without OP getting a 'counter' or unrelated positive feedback from another person on DT or without KWH being kicked from DT (which I think is unlikely to happen),
OP will stay at -2: -1 / +0 (for default settings).

tl;dr: trust scores don't magically 'negligible' themselves.

Ofc, that's a problem when your signature campaign kicks all users with negative trust ratings (or at least doesn't pay them).

poptok1

hero member

Activity: 1638

Merit: 756

Bobby Fischer was right

I just scrolled through your trust rating history and I think that there is actually nothing to worry about.
You have good reviews from quite amount of users and just some meaningless reds from other reds.
Stay fair and I'm positive that You will rehabilitate your trust ratings soon.

IMO KWH's ratting is written with poor English, it will be negligible very soon if you satay fair
with others, of course

FruitsBasket

legendary

Activity: 1232

Merit: 1017

Quote from: alani123 on May 10, 2016, 01:57:15 PM

OP, when receiving a vouch copy you have no obligation to the seller, but rather to the forum members that read it. If the e-book you received a vouch copy of includes an illegal method you'd need to be impartial and out the one that posted it instead of trying to dodge the hard part in an attempt to post a positive review. Your review was irresponsible at best.

I'd say that KWH's negative rating was a bit harsh as you didn't scam anybody yourself. But you should really know better, cooperating with people openly advertising illegal methods to earn money would obviously make you look bad.

Thanks for your opinion, I never would scam anyone as tommorisonwebdesign said, he is one of the many people I dealt with. I really hope that KWH will change the feedback, also I learned that I eill never give a vouch again. When I get a vouch copy I feel a kind of doubt to the seller, so that makes me to. I am confused right now and hope it will be solved.

tommorisonwebdesign

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 251

Quote from: alani123 on May 10, 2016, 01:57:15 PM

OP, when receiving a vouch copy you have no obligation to the seller, but rather to the forum members that read it. If the e-book you received a vouch copy of includes an illegal method you'd need to be impartial and out the one that posted it instead of trying to dodge the hard part in an attempt to post a positive review. Your review was irresponsible at best.

I'd say that KWH's negative rating was a bit harsh as you didn't scam anybody yourself. But you should really know better, cooperating with people openly advertising illegal methods to earn money would obviously make you look bad.

fruitsbasket didn't scam anybody personally, or at all in that matter. If he was a scammer, he would not have paid me for the programming work I've done for him.

alani123

legendary

Activity: 2422

Merit: 1451

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

OP, when receiving a vouch copy you have no obligation to the seller, but rather to the forum members that read it. If the e-book you received a vouch copy of includes an illegal method you'd need to be impartial and out the one that posted it instead of trying to dodge the hard part in an attempt to post a positive review. Your review was irresponsible at best.

I'd say that KWH's negative rating was a bit harsh as you didn't scam anybody yourself. But you should really know better, cooperating with people openly advertising illegal methods to earn money would obviously make you look bad.

FruitsBasket

legendary

Activity: 1232

Merit: 1017

Quote from: tommorisonwebdesign on May 10, 2016, 01:40:09 PM

this user has been a cliemt of mine and has paid ne bitcoin in the past, i think what hqaooenbed was a simple misunderstanding on Fruit Baskets part. there should be no negertive trudty with fruit basket.

Thanks for your kind words!

Quote from: Lutpin on May 10, 2016, 01:43:19 PM

Maybe not vouching for every shit over and over again would be a solution for this problem?

That would be the solution for me, I believe people to much, and didn't think that there are soo many scams on the internet. I hope KWH can do anything instead of just ignoring me.

@KWH, In my vouch review I said that it is not very recommended to do. I think u mis understood me since I said that u won't do anything illegal by yourself, u made a comperassion that robbing a bank and only drive the get away car is also nothing illegal by yourself. It is different here, the site was fake, which I found out after u left me negative trust. I don't know if you are going to read this, but I hope you do.

Lutpin

copper member

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1874

Goodbye, Z.

Maybe not vouching for every shit over and over again would be a solution for this problem?

Quote from: alani123 on May 10, 2016, 01:57:15 PM

OP, when receiving a vouch copy you have no obligation to the seller, but rather to the forum members that read it. If the e-book you received a vouch copy of includes an illegal method you'd need to be impartial and out the one that posted it instead of trying to dodge the hard part in an attempt to post a positive review. Your review was irresponsible at best.

I highly agree with that.

tommorisonwebdesign

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 251

this user has been a cliemt of mine and has paid ne bitcoin in the past, i think what hqaooenbed was a simple misunderstanding on Fruit Baskets part. there should be no negertive trudty with fruit basket.

FruitsBasket

legendary

Activity: 1232

Merit: 1017

Hello forum!

I have taken a vouch copy of a very new member on this site, he said it was an kind of illegal method.
So I got the vouch copy and said that it was profitable but not very recommend to do. Then I get negative rating from user KWH for promoting illegal make money schemes. Now it turned out that the whole method was fake. If you read this you will know it:http://altenen-thieves.blogspot.nl/.

I think I do not deserve negative trust, I have done many trades, with many people. I never scammed anyone a single penny, but still I get negative trust fir something which is not true, and if u look at it afterwards, it is completely false. I don't know what I should do now.

Now I asked KWH if he wants to remove/change his feedback, but no reply. Please tell me what u think!

(Changed title, now hope he reply's)

Topic: KWH IS USING TRUST INCORRECTLY? GIVE YOUR OPINION! - page 2. (Read 1731 times)