Pages:
Author

Topic: KYC for bounty hunters Yes or No - page 6. (Read 664 times)

jr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 2
October 03, 2018, 01:01:06 PM
#26
It's depend on you. Do you believe in the project you joined?. If it's YES, If you decided join any bounty campaign, you think that it's good, then you will are ready to do KYC. If Answer is NO, You don't need to join it, because you think it's not good, then KYC is not necessary.
member
Activity: 322
Merit: 20
Donating 10% to charity
October 03, 2018, 12:55:57 PM
#25
Quote
Definitely a big NO-NO for me.

Why? My reasons are the ff:
  • Bounty hunters aren't even paid that much. Whats the point?
  • Bounty hunters can't always be considered investors if they aren't even paid in token form
  • It's simply too much hassle for too small amount

I partially agree with this. There is a lot of people who use alt accounts/bots in bounty campaigns of any kind for the extra pay and that is no secret. However, even when certain small measurements could be taken it's not that big deal due to the cost-benefit of the whole thing.

It also depends on how much is each one getting paid. The biggest ranks inside bounties could have a bit more watch over them since they are the ones who should deliver the best quality due to the highest pay.

It's normally too much hassle. However, it could be useful in some cases.
member
Activity: 364
Merit: 19
www.codex.one
October 03, 2018, 12:48:26 PM
#24
KYC for bounty hunters can be very dangerous . Most bounty hunters participate in 20 , 30 , 50 or even more campaigns at the same time , so they have to submitt their id documents to 50 different projects ! Who will/can guarantee the integrity of these companies and the privacy of your data? I can assure you that no one will ! You just give your documents in the wrong hands and then you will be surprised where did you get loans that you did not apply for  Undecided
jr. member
Activity: 168
Merit: 1
October 03, 2018, 12:48:21 PM
#23
hy all,

please i m sorry asking this or...

i know that someone else might posted this earlier but i want to confirm why is KYC necessary for bounty hunter?
or do you think KYC is for Investors alone or for both.

but to me i found out that kyc is just for investor because bounty hunters are just to promote the project and make the ico successful so i don't see any reason why kyc should be for bounty hunters.

to me proof of authentication is enough to cover the kyc because most times some people tries to cheat in the bounty campaign by submitting multiple account in a particular project, but the aids of the proof of authentication will help reduce the cheating and the rest.

so now tell me what do you think and what are you ideas?
KYC for hunters isn't important but I think it's necessary, in cases where managers find suspicious activities of hunters, because some hunters go about creating multiple twitter, Facebook, and even Bitcoin talk account just to get more token from bounty campaign, and that could have a negative effect on price, so for such reason some mangers will tend to conduct KYC just to remove cheats.
member
Activity: 532
Merit: 10
October 03, 2018, 12:46:30 PM
#22
KYC is actually for investors, but there are some projects that require social media campaign participants such as Facebook and Twitter to also have to graduate from KYC. possible to reduce multiple accounts. and fraudsters, but sometimes some participants retreated for the sake of self-data security.
member
Activity: 238
Merit: 10
October 03, 2018, 12:44:43 PM
#21
Hi. I think that KYC should be for bounty hunters.
in order to prevent a lot of accounts in one person.
full member
Activity: 252
Merit: 100
October 03, 2018, 12:43:45 PM
#20
KYC for bounty hunters should not be necessary and it is not required by most projects however, it helps in minimizing fake accounts and bots so for me I want it to be imposed on suspicious accounts.
jr. member
Activity: 115
Merit: 1
October 03, 2018, 12:43:01 PM
#19
i think if using KYC it will help to clarify access to prizes obtained from bounty participants, maybe those who feel burdened are people who take part in the campaign more than one account.
member
Activity: 243
Merit: 10
October 03, 2018, 12:42:08 PM
#18
in my opinion, fill KYC if the reason is to prevent cheaters in the bounty I agree. many scammers and cheaters in the bounty campaign to prevent that one way is by filling in kyc.
member
Activity: 546
Merit: 21
October 03, 2018, 12:39:46 PM
#17
KYC is good ,its the only way to control cheaters using multiple accounts and at the same time its against the law too but either way I prefer KYC ,breaking the rules to tackle cheaters is not that bad
sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 256
October 03, 2018, 12:37:37 PM
#16
hy all,

please i m sorry asking this or...

i know that someone else might posted this earlier but i want to confirm why is KYC necessary for bounty hunter?
or do you think KYC is for Investors alone or for both.

but to me i found out that kyc is just for investor because bounty hunters are just to promote the project and make the ico successful so i don't see any reason why kyc should be for bounty hunters.

to me proof of authentication is enough to cover the kyc because most times some people tries to cheat in the bounty campaign by submitting multiple account in a particular project, but the aids of the proof of authentication will help reduce the cheating and the rest.

so now tell me what do you think and what are you ideas?

It depends on how good the project is i think.
If the projects start with an already big company, and the rewards is really high for bounty.
I think it's okay to use KYC
full member
Activity: 262
Merit: 100
October 03, 2018, 12:36:46 PM
#15
hy all,

please i m sorry asking this or...

i know that someone else might posted this earlier but i want to confirm why is KYC necessary for bounty hunter?
or do you think KYC is for Investors alone or for both.

but to me i found out that kyc is just for investor because bounty hunters are just to promote the project and make the ico successful so i don't see any reason why kyc should be for bounty hunters.

to me proof of authentication is enough to cover the kyc because most times some people tries to cheat in the bounty campaign by submitting multiple account in a particular project, but the aids of the proof of authentication will help reduce the cheating and the rest.

so now tell me what do you think and what are you ideas?

Definitely a big NO-NO for me.

Why? My reasons are the ff:
  • Bounty hunters aren't even paid that much. Whats the point?
  • Bounty hunters can't always be considered investors if they aren't even paid in token form
  • It's simply too much hassle for too small amount

I'll understand on what you're point but of course there some reasons why we need to do KYC. As a bounty hunter I saw a lot of cheater like join with multiple accounts, steal the name of other member that cheater can have a stakes and gain rewards. If the bounty project need KYC, we need to follow it as long as we want to get our rewards from it.
full member
Activity: 402
Merit: 101
October 03, 2018, 12:33:06 PM
#14
Let's think about it. How is KYC stands for? I think everyone understands that this is knowing your customer. But bounty hunters are not exactly a customer, so what does bounty hunter have to do with this? No, and in general, I think it is against the law.
KYC for bounty is required for limit the movement for cheater and scammers Bounty but i see few bounty campaign not required KYC for their participant
full member
Activity: 822
Merit: 100
October 03, 2018, 12:29:28 PM
#13
hy all,

please i m sorry asking this or...

i know that someone else might posted this earlier but i want to confirm why is KYC necessary for bounty hunter?
or do you think KYC is for Investors alone or for both.

but to me i found out that kyc is just for investor because bounty hunters are just to promote the project and make the ico successful so i don't see any reason why kyc should be for bounty hunters.

to me proof of authentication is enough to cover the kyc because most times some people tries to cheat in the bounty campaign by submitting multiple account in a particular project, but the aids of the proof of authentication will help reduce the cheating and the rest.

so now tell me what do you think and what are you ideas?
unfortunately a lot of project are mandating it for hunters to receive reward, to make things worst it is being asked for after hunters have finished working for the project probably to screen participants out
member
Activity: 364
Merit: 34
Fast, Smart, Trustworthy
October 03, 2018, 12:28:32 PM
#12
There are thousands of potential cheaters in bounty campaigns

 Grin You make me laugh with these words.

By the way, we can not imagine that they can cheat with how many accounts. Such as Buddy bounty campaign, I just took a look the spreadsheet and found out hundreds of accounts that own by one person. There are over 11k participants in twitter campaign sheet but only have 3k participants in telegram bounty group. And now just over 1.1k participants submit KYC. So what do you think?
member
Activity: 238
Merit: 10
Open and Transparent Science Powered By Blockchain
October 03, 2018, 12:25:16 PM
#11
Of course"! Because it is the only effective method of dealing with bot. An honest person, an honest hunter must have one account and must be able to confirm it with a passport. This is the norm!
sr. member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 322
October 03, 2018, 12:21:57 PM
#10
As a bounty hunter, I never support KYC for bounty hunters but whenever you consider from the ICO owner's perspective, it should be done for all. First of all, there are thousands of people who are cheating in the bounty. Secondly, there are some rules and regulations in the different country. So, as an ICO owner, people need to ensure real documents where KYC is also required, IMO.
full member
Activity: 406
Merit: 110
October 03, 2018, 12:17:41 PM
#9
hy all,

please i m sorry asking this or...

i know that someone else might posted this earlier but i want to confirm why is KYC necessary for bounty hunter?
or do you think KYC is for Investors alone or for both.

but to me i found out that kyc is just for investor because bounty hunters are just to promote the project and make the ico successful so i don't see any reason why kyc should be for bounty hunters.

to me proof of authentication is enough to cover the kyc because most times some people tries to cheat in the bounty campaign by submitting multiple account in a particular project, but the aids of the proof of authentication will help reduce the cheating and the rest.

so now tell me what do you think and what are you ideas?

Definitely a big NO-NO for me.

Why? My reasons are the ff:
  • Bounty hunters aren't even paid that much. Whats the point?
  • Bounty hunters can't always be considered investors if they aren't even paid in token form
  • It's simply too much hassle for too small amount
member
Activity: 336
Merit: 12
October 03, 2018, 12:15:33 PM
#8
I think KYC does have a very useful function and maybe it works very well, besides that I think that KYC really avoids duplicate accounts or people who want to take advantage of our account where it often happens sometimes I really like KYC but sometimes I don't like it with some KYC where KYC is usually very detailed with other meanings including the passport electricity bill, and I am sometimes very confused whether all bounty hunters have that data because I think bounty hunter age is also very random not only 24 years. so I think that KYC is positive or good for bounty hunters and also bad for bounty hunters who sometimes do not have identification items above.
full member
Activity: 912
Merit: 100
October 03, 2018, 11:43:27 AM
#7
Probably the same reason as for investors. I see no other reason. And in general, recently noticed that bounty and enter KYC. Want to make money - go through KYC.
Pages:
Jump to: