Pages:
Author

Topic: KYC is it mandatory for security tokens ? (Read 585 times)

sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 251
December 07, 2019, 05:26:57 PM
#31
I tried to register in Blueshare.io and they re-routed me to another platform called Altcoinomy.

They state they are financial institution and compliant with Swiss laws ,etc.

Anyway is there always the need to pass KYC in order to invest in an STO?

 
Maybe you can miss KYC with your Blueshare exchange account if withdrawal under 2 btc in one day, many exchange account have submit KYC but you can miss it if your withdrawal not reach above 2 btc in one day, just for bittrex exchange account have pass KYC because there are not available withdrawing without pass KYC and look not available trading without have submit your data first.
full member
Activity: 344
Merit: 107
November 24, 2019, 10:41:35 AM
#30
Yes, KYC is of course required for the the security tokens. You have to must be pass KYC in STO. In many projects ICO,IEO both of asking KYC.
KYC isn't mandatory for all of the countries i mean it's depend on your country basis. But don't try to submit documents in everywhere without legitimate projects.
full member
Activity: 630
Merit: 103
October 30, 2019, 10:19:00 PM
#29
It is mandatory per regulation policy of the country that legalized Crypto currency but i wonder of some projects that they will not required KYC to their participants so i doubt if the project is legit or not so i decided not to join their projects to ensure the safety of my investments.
member
Activity: 560
Merit: 17
August 02, 2019, 08:34:26 AM
#28
Yes, it is!
Securities are strictly regulated in all countries.
This fact is why it makes me curious, how in the earth those projects who claim to be securities are giving out security tokens without kyc for bounty.
hero member
Activity: 2590
Merit: 644
For the token, KYC is absolutely mandatory, Strictly obey the laws of the host country and against money laundering criminals.
^ That was completely mandatory, and the companies like IEO, CEO or STO should obey to implement KYC/AML which KYC means Know Your Customer and AML means Anti-Money Laundering. AML is very strict even anywhere in the country they should implement that law to those companies related to an investment to avoid money laundering. KYC/AML implementation is becoming more and more common in the ICO space, and for good reason. Also, there's no way to avoid if you feel you are safe on that company then submit your personal data if not then, avoid and find another one.
full member
Activity: 658
Merit: 100
For the token, KYC is absolutely mandatory, Strictly obey the laws of the host country and against money laundering criminals.
full member
Activity: 2142
Merit: 183
It should be early to read the rules that have been made by them when launching a project. we can be sure that they will inform you that later they need a kyc at the end of the project. if we feel that we are not very profitable for us, because the personal data we provide without our knowledge will be for what to use. can it guarantee the security of the confidentiality of personal data in them. better to be avoided from the beginning so as not to harm later.

Of course, it is better to shy away from transmitting your identity. However, after the last FATF decision comes into force, no one has the right to demand to undergo a KYC check if the cryptocurrency transaction is less than one thousand dollars. These rules should also apply to exchanges. In my opinion, they are not so bad. It will be necessary to do more tranzaky, but they will not have to exceed thousands of dollars each and no KYC check will not have to pass.
sr. member
Activity: 2422
Merit: 267
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
It should be early to read the rules that have been made by them when launching a project. we can be sure that they will inform you that later they need a kyc at the end of the project. if we feel that we are not very profitable for us, because the personal data we provide without our knowledge will be for what to use. can it guarantee the security of the confidentiality of personal data in them. better to be avoided from the beginning so as not to harm later.
full member
Activity: 2268
Merit: 121
Enterapp Pre-Sale Live - bit.ly/3UrMCWI
Kyc is indeed needed for regerstrasi if the project that is being done is so brilliant.
but you have to be careful too much that is used for theft. try to learn more about the project
It is very wise what you say, that you must be careful with the theft of personal data from the requested KYC results. but we do not know who is asking for and whether it is accountable for the confidentiality that we have given. so far I have avoided KYC even though you may say a very diamond project can be given for registration.
full member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 122
KYC is for the security of the user and the company that holds the STO.
only sto's ? what about ico , exchange , gambling sites , etc... ?  kyc if for everyone or for every kind of business   .

Quote
KYC is actually a good thing for both parties.
it depends  . it depends on the site/company because not all are legit ,this is why some people are doubting to the a kyc  .

Quote
it is up to you if you will trust your private information to the investment firm you are choosing to.
if you found out that the company or the site that you will be using is legit then you should not hesitate to do a kyc  .

Quote
If the thing that is holding you back is the thing that your not comfortable for you to share your personal information then I would advise you not to join the firm.
yeah  . there are still many oppurtunites out there that can be done privately without the need of kyc .
member
Activity: 226
Merit: 14
Kyc is indeed needed for regerstrasi if the project that is being done is so brilliant.
but you have to be careful too much that is used for theft. try to learn more about the project
full member
Activity: 798
Merit: 109
https://bmy.guide
KYC is for the security of the user and the company that holds the STO. KYC is actually a good thing for both parties. However, it is up to you if you will trust your private information to the investment firm you are choosing to. If the thing that is holding you back is the thing that your not comfortable for you to share your personal information then I would advise you not to join the firm.
sr. member
Activity: 2422
Merit: 357
I tried to register in Blueshare.io and they re-routed me to another platform called Altcoinomy.

They state they are financial institution and compliant with Swiss laws ,etc.

Anyway is there always the need to pass KYC in order to invest in an STO?

 


If i had a doubt to a site and registered with a sub-platform or third party sites then i probably would not give all my personal informations or KYC in that most specially if they ask for more than your name and age. Emails, passwords, birthday will be such a solid tandem to hack or stole all your valuables in the internet. We should always be careful because even those legit sites have counterfeits.
full member
Activity: 854
Merit: 108
It will depend of the country you belong in which the certain project was facilitated. Every nation has their own draft of Crypto regulation so maybe some countries will not require KYC or some may require KYC but only to the project owners in which investors will do KYC depend of the amount they will going to invest.
legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1789
If the startup project conducts a IEO sale phase, they will not ask you for personal information. Especially if the exchange is decentralized. You should also pay attention to where the project plans to add its tokens before deciding whether to invest there.

You guys are making it off-topic now. We're clearly talking about STO from the beginning, so I doubt any legitimate STO would do the same like Binance IEO.

It's even more interesting to see that one of the (claimed) STOs that run their bounty campaign stated that the hunters don't have to undergo KYC to get their tokens while investors have to do that. If that's true, maybe there are different laws that apply to STO. I always assume that hunters would be considered as investors too.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
All the concerned parties in an ICO that has the KYC process have a better chance of receiving recognition from banks and other financial institutions. The ICOs are also more likely to follow the anti-money laundering regulations.
[/quote]If the startup project conducts a IEO sale phase, they will not ask you for personal information. Especially if the exchange is decentralized. You should also pay attention to where the project plans to add its tokens before deciding whether to invest there.
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
Fraudsters can also provide kyc verification for users, so I would not call it a clear indicator of the legitimacy of a startup. And for a long time I could not understand why it was necessary at all for them to submit my documents when it was not known where they would use them. But apparently it was just an attempt to deceive investors and show themselves as a real ICO project, and not a scam
All the concerned parties in an ICO that has the KYC process have a better chance of receiving recognition from banks and other financial institutions. The ICOs are also more likely to follow the anti-money laundering regulations.
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
Fraudsters can also provide kyc verification for users, so I would not call it a clear indicator of the legitimacy of a startup. And for a long time I could not understand why it was necessary at all for them to submit my documents when it was not known where they would use them. But apparently it was just an attempt to deceive investors and show themselves as a real ICO project, and not a scam
hero member
Activity: 1806
Merit: 672
KYC is absolutely mandatory and required by law for all sorts of securities around the world.

A company is required by law to always know all of its shareholders.

 This of course includes security tokens.

I second that, STO is very much different that ICO we can consider this as a safe way to invest because they are compliant and they are regulated check this article it has all the answer to all your question
https://hackernoon.com/know-your-customer-kyc-regulations-for-stos-43c55132f196

Even normal ICOs requires KYC, if they want to launch their token sale locally in a country that requires KYC they will be ordered to do so in order for them to make the ICO happen. STOs on the other hand are much more on a stricter level since they act mostly like shares of a company, it will be like a stock for the investors that is why regulations for STOs are much more heavily enforced.
legendary
Activity: 2450
Merit: 1047
KYC is absolutely mandatory and required by law for all sorts of securities around the world.

A company is required by law to always know all of its shareholders.

 This of course includes security tokens.

I second that, STO is very much different that ICO we can consider this as a safe way to invest because they are compliant and they are regulated check this article it has all the answer to all your question
https://hackernoon.com/know-your-customer-kyc-regulations-for-stos-43c55132f196
Pages:
Jump to: