I agree with you that, kyc should be meant for the big investors those that have the larger percentage shares or token of a particular project and leaving the small of few shares hodler without kyc.
However, a system or regulation must be fair, because there is no comparison between large or small investors, they are all investors. If treated like that, it will only cause cause and endless problems. They like it or not, it must be treated like that. 
Topic: KYC should be for big whales - page 8. (Read 25305 times)
Honestly, KYC should be mandated for everyone especially bounty hunters. KYC should solely be for the larger holders of such coin. I think the main reason why hunters ate involved in KYC is mainly to discourage multiple accounts which is greed. Apart from that it should be for the market determinants - the whales.
I'm here today to drop my own point about how KYC should be use
- KYC requirement for bounties and airdrops is so unreasonable ,KYC implementation is no doubt a good idea but it should be forced only on big investors that wants to buy large amount of a token either From Exchanges
- there should be limit for KYC requirements e.g like if an investor wants to buy 10,000$ worths of tokens upward then he or she must go through KYC ,just saying
- KYC requirement for bounties and airdrops is so unreasonable ,KYC implementation is no doubt a good idea but it should be forced only on big investors that wants to buy large amount of a token either From Exchanges
- there should be limit for KYC requirements e.g like if an investor wants to buy 10,000$ worths of tokens upward then he or she must go through KYC ,just saying
That is to ensure the reliability and the nationality of the investors. They need to follow up some country regulation if they can invest or not in an ICO whether they are big or small.
Maybe it made sense if everyone did not try to disguise their large sums in smaller amounts! So with a KYC requirement at large amounts, the person or group of people could fractionate those amounts! Regarding KYC and bounties, I definitely stay away from projects like this! It's not avoiding exposure, simply the reason is that most of these projects are behind your information, even when it's not ICOs and ask for 'email'! It's a sophisticated way to get your information.
I agree with you that, kyc should be meant for the big investors those that have the larger percentage shares or token of a particular project and leaving the small of few shares hodler without kyc.
Many bounty hunters earn a large number of coins, which is equivalent to significant amounts in dollars. So I think the introduction of KYC is a justified step. In addition, it protects bounty hunters from scammers who use multiple accounts to participate.
Actually, I believe KYC should be for investors of a particular project due to compliance. What I really don't understand or get is KYC being demanded for Airdroppers and bounty hunters. It actually makes no sense since these set of people aren't investors. Sometimes, I see KYC for bounty hunters and Airdroppers as a means of denying them what they have worked for. It shouldn't be required!
some options provide KYC does not make sense, because it is contrary to the very nature of the decentralization of cryptocurrency. But how then all the talk about anonymity is not controllability? It seems to me that the entire PR of cryptocurrency in 2016 was possible precisely because of such opportunities.
Actually, I believe KYC should be for investors of a particular project due to compliance. What I really don't understand or get is KYC being demanded for Airdroppers and bounty hunters. It actually makes no sense since these set of people aren't investors. Sometimes, I see KYC for bounty hunters and Airdroppers as a means of denying them what they have worked for. It shouldn't be required!
KYC for big customer is already going. For large amount i think KYC must to protect fraud. But bounty and airdrop KYC i am not support because i am not your customer. I am just promote your project.
I fully agree with your opinion and I would also like the Headhunters to be relieved of the provision of personal data. In any case, in the cryptocurrency market there are certain aspects regarding the investor and traders, but the requirements for the Bounty companies are nowhere Where are not officially spelled out. I'm here today to drop my own point about how KYC should be use
- KYC requirement for bounties and airdrops is so unreasonable ,KYC implementation is no doubt a good idea but it should be forced only on big investors that wants to buy large amount of a token either From Exchanges
- there should be limit for KYC requirements e.g like if an investor wants to buy 10,000$ worths of tokens upward then he or she must go through KYC ,just saying
- KYC requirement for bounties and airdrops is so unreasonable ,KYC implementation is no doubt a good idea but it should be forced only on big investors that wants to buy large amount of a token either From Exchanges
- there should be limit for KYC requirements e.g like if an investor wants to buy 10,000$ worths of tokens upward then he or she must go through KYC ,just saying
I keep saying this too. KYC should be for those who are investing very large sums. If someone just has $100 to invest in a project what is the use for KYC? If KYC becomes fully necessary in the crypto space I think the level of scam will increase instead of decrease because scammers with the intention to obtain users data can do so through a token launch
KYC for big customer is already going. For large amount i think KYC must to protect fraud. But bounty and airdrop KYC i am not support because i am not your customer. I am just promote your project.
Of course, it would be correct - KYC for big whales, but it will not. And no matter how much we want, this procedure will soon be implemented everywhere.
I think KYC is required for every aspect (Investors, Developers and also Bounty Hunters). If you didn't feel confidence with KYC then you should invest on "Real-Life" Investment 
Lol. Real life invesents would require kyc more than crypto investments. Having big whales undergo kyc should in a way, regulate pump and dump manipulations by these people.
I think KYC is required for every aspect (Investors, Developers and also Bounty Hunters). If you didn't feel confidence with KYC then you should invest on "Real-Life" Investment
I agree that major players must undergo a serious KYC, but I also don’t mind if the team members of this or that project also went through KYC, so that we would know who we work with!
Why is everyone looking at their side and believe that they are at risk more than the developers of the project. True and in no other way, no one will agree to work on a bare trust, especially when most of the projects brought losses. 
Of course, it would be correct - KYC for big whales, but it will not. And no matter how much we want, this procedure will soon be implemented everywhere.
While some are against of the KYC, it should be for everyone if the project will require, but it's still better
if there is no KYC because it will bring more attention from investors, but whales wants to be safe so they will look on a trusted project
probably with KYC.
Non KYC attract more investors, while KYC will gain big investors.
KYC is a new way to be applied. It is for all investors that will buy the tokens or coins in the ICOs or IEOs, and other token offering. If you want to buy the coins or tokens projects, you need to require KYC, it will be app;lied for all, not and if the big whales are also going to involve, they will also do such things.
Most whales these days do not invest in ICOs. Most of them wait for the coin to list on exchange before buying. Sometimes, they intention cause dump in the price of the coin on exchange.
Most times, retail investors are the ones that buy ICOs, except in private sales, where some whales might be interested to throwing some money into, because coins are cheap at that stage.
Most times, retail investors are the ones that buy ICOs, except in private sales, where some whales might be interested to throwing some money into, because coins are cheap at that stage.
I'm here today to drop my own point about how KYC should be use
- KYC requirement for bounties and airdrops is so unreasonable ,KYC implementation is no doubt a good idea but it should be forced only on big investors that wants to buy large amount of a token either From Exchanges
- there should be limit for KYC requirements e.g like if an investor wants to buy 10,000$ worths of tokens upward then he or she must go through KYC ,just saying
- KYC requirement for bounties and airdrops is so unreasonable ,KYC implementation is no doubt a good idea but it should be forced only on big investors that wants to buy large amount of a token either From Exchanges
- there should be limit for KYC requirements e.g like if an investor wants to buy 10,000$ worths of tokens upward then he or she must go through KYC ,just saying
KYC requirements for everyone has have a good intentions but it can be abuse of some bad elements wants to use our credentials for any purpose so that's the point of others , but we can have alternative ways instead of submitting our credentials just to claim our tokens.
Of course, it would be correct - KYC for big whales, but it will not. And no matter how much we want, this procedure will soon be implemented everywhere.
Jump to: