Topic: L - page 2. (Read 3728 times)
DONT HASSLE OR SPAM OR BRING BAD COMMENTS TO MY POST, I AM DOING IT THE BEST I CAN, I KNOW I AM NOT A GOLD COIN TO BE FRIENDS OF ANYONE, BUT I DO MY BEST, SEND MESSAGE WITH RESPECT AND I WILL RESPECT YOU THE SAME WAY, THANKS FOR YOUR TRUST AND SUPPORT!!
the first thing I requested on my post and it is the first thing you do put a Neg on my trust!!
the first thing I requested on my post and it is the first thing you do put a Neg on my trust!!
It's a warning to others. If you proven him wrong without the suspicious loan with your alt he would of removed it. But, you have just made it worse for yourself and provided us with enough information that your initial intentions were to take that money and not return it.
DONT HASSLE OR SPAM OR BRING BAD COMMENTS TO MY POST, I AM DOING IT THE BEST I CAN, I KNOW I AM NOT A GOLD COIN TO BE FRIENDS OF ANYONE, BUT I DO MY BEST, SEND MESSAGE WITH RESPECT AND I WILL RESPECT YOU THE SAME WAY, THANKS FOR YOUR TRUST AND SUPPORT!!
the first thing I requested on my post and it is the first thing you do put a Neg on my trust!!
the first thing I requested on my post and it is the first thing you do put a Neg on my trust!!
I am not backing, like I am telling you I just want my name clean, and if it takes a lawsuit I will do it, because you are nobody to difame anyone anywhere. Respect others intent to grow their reputation, dont drop it because you felt like. why you didnt first send me a private message telling me that having to open loan in other website, that has nothing to do with this one will earn me a negative trust. It is the way you guys do it that fu..ck up this website.
Nope - I can guarantee you will never file a lawsuit on me.
lol now who is pathetic lol, accept it and pick on someone else because I am not backing, at least do what tomatocage offered me. and by the way why did you block private messages from me, you couldnt handle it and thought that I will just let this pass?
Yep - one profane message in all caps told me you would have nothing important to say, and I blocked you.
You are backing down. I can guarantee you I will never see any lawsuit papers. You are just a small time scammer and liar.
When you see the papers in your hand what are you going to do, ask me for a truce? or cancel your travel to mexico?
Will Santa Claus be delivering it?
ok, I must assume you are able to pay punitive damages?
Shut up with your garbage.
Until I see papers in my hand, you are just a pathetic liar.
I offered you a truce VOD and you are not accepting it, what do you want me to do?
What good is a truce? I'm not at war with you. All I did was show people you are a potential scammer when you took out two simultaneous loans with unsustainable interest rates.
You then made it personal by calling me a bunch of names. So funny how you forget that and threaten to "sue" me for calling you a name. lol
Bring on your lawsuit because I'm calling you a pathetic liar.
thank you for your observations and when its your first investment, one never thinks anything you do could be picky and creepy for others, assuming that you guys will see when my second loan gets repaid, and get all your words in the deepest part of your body!!!
what bluff VOD, I just want my name and my integrity to be respected, you cant call anyone a scammer just because you want to, even though we are posting in the internet, anything you do have its consequences and you will feel them, because you didnt want to be humble and eat your words, you think you are smart and know it all, but guess what you dont.
I am not in a political charge, but I am close friend of the senator and the congressman, I bet you already noticed. If you want me to take it to the next level, I will.
what bluff VOD, I just want my name and my integrity to be respected, you cant call anyone a scammer just because you want to, even though we are posting in the internet, anything you do have its consequences and you will feel them, because you didnt want to be humble and eat your words, you think you are smart and know it all, but guess what you dont.
I am not in a political charge, but I am close friend of the senator and the congressman, I bet you already noticed. If you want me to take it to the next level, I will.
If you can prove it to me/us that you are not a scammer, and we believe you. then I'm sure Vod, tomatocage and I will remove the neg trust. We are not calling anyone a scammer because we want to, we are suspecting you, and I will remove the neg trust if you can show me that you are a scammer (repeating myself).
I am not in a political charge, but I am close friend of the senator and the congressman, I bet you already noticed. If you want me to take it to the next level, I will.
Don't wait - take it to the next level tomorrow.
ok, good to know !! I offered you a settlement obviously you are not thinking clearly, you have until Monday 10 am to accept it, otherwise I will talk with my lawyer.
Dude, I've already called your bluff. I don't believe you are stupid enough to sue for defamation when you have done the exact same thing, but you may be.
Don't wait until Monday - go see him/her tomorrow.
Look at what martinver left trust to ffrogman and what ffrogman left for him:
Martinver to ffrogman:
ffrogman to Martinver:
Let's not say they have the same sentence: He was trustworthy and paid back on time at a higher interest rate than we agreed to.
ffrogman's tx id is the same as martinver's tx id.
Logically, ffrogman should use this
ffrogman = martinver = scam
Martinver to ffrogman:
Quote
I RECEIVED A LOAN FROM HIM, NICE GUY!!
I sent him .05 BTC in this transaction:
https://blockchain.info/tx/d0ee7e0f6bed95906b20ba605cbc8e7f0b08f62552c984e16eb5deec8e9c12a7
He paid back to my requested address here:
https://blockchain.info/tx/d00fce0a9d769bba1072992e32c09d99cb36010536388243a9c1646b7c870ec1
He was trustworthy and paid back on time at a higher interest rate than we agreed to.
I sent him .05 BTC in this transaction:
https://blockchain.info/tx/d0ee7e0f6bed95906b20ba605cbc8e7f0b08f62552c984e16eb5deec8e9c12a7
He paid back to my requested address here:
https://blockchain.info/tx/d00fce0a9d769bba1072992e32c09d99cb36010536388243a9c1646b7c870ec1
He was trustworthy and paid back on time at a higher interest rate than we agreed to.
ffrogman to Martinver:
Quote
I sent him .05 BTC in this transaction:
https://blockchain.info/tx/d0ee7e0f6bed95906b20ba605cbc8e7f0b08f62552c984e16eb5deec8e9c12a7
He paid back to my requested address here:
https://blockchain.info/tx/d00fce0a9d769bba1072992e32c09d99cb36010536388243a9c1646b7c870ec1
He was trustworthy and paid back on time at a higher interest rate than we agreed to.
https://blockchain.info/tx/d0ee7e0f6bed95906b20ba605cbc8e7f0b08f62552c984e16eb5deec8e9c12a7
He paid back to my requested address here:
https://blockchain.info/tx/d00fce0a9d769bba1072992e32c09d99cb36010536388243a9c1646b7c870ec1
He was trustworthy and paid back on time at a higher interest rate than we agreed to.
Let's not say they have the same sentence: He was trustworthy and paid back on time at a higher interest rate than we agreed to.
ffrogman's tx id is the same as martinver's tx id.
Logically, ffrogman should use this
Quote
link on the "I sent him 0.5 BTC in this transaction", but not the one martinver sent btc back to him after the loan,assuming that martinver's comment is correct.ffrogman = martinver = scam
I was quoting him if you see I put "I RECEIVED A LOAN FROM HIM, NICE GUY!!" and then quoted him
ok, good to know !! I offered you a settlement obviously you are not thinking clearly, you have until Monday 10 am to accept it, otherwise I will talk with my lawyer.
Sure... You can say whatever you want. I'm just trying to protect this community from scammers... I read everything and VOD and others does have their point and are valid. I'm just listing any suspicions...
Look at what martinver left trust to ffrogman and what ffrogman left for him:
Martinver to ffrogman:
ffrogman to Martinver:
Let's not say they have the same sentence: He was trustworthy and paid back on time at a higher interest rate than we agreed to.
ffrogman's tx id is the same as martinver's tx id.
Logically, ffrogman should use this
ffrogman = martinver = scam
Martinver to ffrogman:
Quote
I RECEIVED A LOAN FROM HIM, NICE GUY!!
I sent him .05 BTC in this transaction:
https://blockchain.info/tx/d0ee7e0f6bed95906b20ba605cbc8e7f0b08f62552c984e16eb5deec8e9c12a7
He paid back to my requested address here:
https://blockchain.info/tx/d00fce0a9d769bba1072992e32c09d99cb36010536388243a9c1646b7c870ec1
He was trustworthy and paid back on time at a higher interest rate than we agreed to.
I sent him .05 BTC in this transaction:
https://blockchain.info/tx/d0ee7e0f6bed95906b20ba605cbc8e7f0b08f62552c984e16eb5deec8e9c12a7
He paid back to my requested address here:
https://blockchain.info/tx/d00fce0a9d769bba1072992e32c09d99cb36010536388243a9c1646b7c870ec1
He was trustworthy and paid back on time at a higher interest rate than we agreed to.
ffrogman to Martinver:
Quote
I sent him .05 BTC in this transaction:
https://blockchain.info/tx/d0ee7e0f6bed95906b20ba605cbc8e7f0b08f62552c984e16eb5deec8e9c12a7
He paid back to my requested address here:
https://blockchain.info/tx/d00fce0a9d769bba1072992e32c09d99cb36010536388243a9c1646b7c870ec1
He was trustworthy and paid back on time at a higher interest rate than we agreed to.
https://blockchain.info/tx/d0ee7e0f6bed95906b20ba605cbc8e7f0b08f62552c984e16eb5deec8e9c12a7
He paid back to my requested address here:
https://blockchain.info/tx/d00fce0a9d769bba1072992e32c09d99cb36010536388243a9c1646b7c870ec1
He was trustworthy and paid back on time at a higher interest rate than we agreed to.
Let's not say they have the same sentence: He was trustworthy and paid back on time at a higher interest rate than we agreed to.
ffrogman's tx id is the same as martinver's tx id.
Logically, ffrogman should use this
Quote
link on the "I sent him 0.5 BTC in this transaction", but not the one martinver sent btc back to him after the loan,assuming that martinver's comment is correct.ffrogman = martinver = scam
ok just let me know when you remove the negative trust and I will remove all the comments and threads where i discuss with you,
Why would you do that? Were all your comments pure bullshit?
Ok, I just erased one of the loans VOD or Martin Lawerence, and your reason for the negative trust was that and I quote "User is taking out two simultaneous "reputation loans" with unsustainable interest rates. Will remove this when he stops this practice" now that I just have should you "logically" remove the negative trust and I also request to stop harrasing and difaming my name or I will sue you for that and in your next vacation to Mexico you will receive a nice full paid penitenciary room for two years according to Mexican Law, so please stop this activity or I will sue you, thank you!!
I accept your conditions.
I will be visiting Mexico this February. I assume you hold a political position of power in Mexico, and didn't really need the 0.25btc loan you just took out?
That led me to this thread because I looked at martinver's post history after I saw the comment on btcjam. I invested in his loan because I invested in him 2 weeks or so ago and told him I would consider investing again. He messaged me after I was done being busy for the holidays and I agreed to invest in him on btcjam.
I'm active because I got an email alert that Vodd posted on martinver's btcjam investment page.
How did that lead you to this thread?
In fact, what led you to invest in his loan on BTCJam anyway?
Coincidence?
Jump to: