It is a normal thing when a big team performs with a very good performance but has to lose because there may be an incident that is not clearly visible to the referee so that the kick which should get an additional point is not authorized by the referee. If Laporta wants to have a rematch then this debate will be interesting, there is a possibility that Barcelona will win if the results of this case give Barcelona the opportunity to have a rematch.
If I look at the ball created by Lamine Yamal, it seems that it is true that the ball was right in the middle of the line and seemed to have crossed it a little, but it could also be said that it had not crossed the line so this is still a matter of debate between Barcelona and the referee who disallowed the goal that was scored Lamine Yamal. Barcelona can accept defeat if they feel they can't, but the goal scored by Lamine Yamal is like crossing the line, so it's only natural that Barcelona doesn't accept defeat and wants to take it to legal action. I think this problem might last a long time if Barcelona really brings it to a standstill. The law is because we don't know what will happen even though Real Madrid are very happy that they can win over Barcelona again.However, it needs to be evaluated that the La Liga president does not apply goal line technology, so maybe that is the reason the referee did not approve the goal scored by Lamine Yamal. Hopefully this debate will soon come to a conclusion. I also want to see what the results of this El Clasico match are. want it to be restarted or does Barcelona have to accept defeat because Laliga does not apply goal line technology unlike the English League which might be legal if it crosses the line.
Because Xavi was looking very determined to leave. Like you said the chairman was doing everything he could to convince him to stay but first Xavi didn't seem likely to be convinced. Maybe Xavi wanted to give it another shot after starting to get positive results for quite long.
