Topic: Lažov Lucija - page 2. (Read 672 times)
Ma stvarno nema smisla otvarati topice zbog takvih pizdarija. Ja sam nekako mislio da je to standardna zajebancija na koju nitko više ne reagira, ono kurenje da se samo odrađuje sig kampanja.
Pamtite li Luciusa koji je brisao svoje postove vezane za Regulus ban, i kako je naprasno nestao iz lokal foruma.
Sad taj isti Lucius optužuje mene kako sam rekao da je on spammer.
Aj kako smo nisko pali.
Nemam nameru dalje diskutovati sa njim.
Mnogo mu je dosadno, pa je otvorio i topic samo za mene i zabranio mi pristup:
https://archive.vn/y8rRH
Sad taj isti Lucius optužuje mene kako sam rekao da je on spammer.
Aj kako smo nisko pali.
Nemam nameru dalje diskutovati sa njim.
Mnogo mu je dosadno, pa je otvorio i topic samo za mene i zabranio mi pristup:
I avoid this part of the forum as much as possible because I am not a person who enjoys endless discussions about someone’s reputation or similar things. I try to follow the rules of the forum and be as correct as possible towards other users, which I do not always succeed in, but I think that most people perceive me as a positive person on the forum (exceptions, of course, always exist).
What particularly bothers me is that someone calls me a signature spammer, because I have never been one and I have zero tolerance for such people. Although I do not pay much attention to such things, I have been in a similar situation many times as today, so I think I should react and point out the somewhat strange behavior of a user who indirectly called me a signature spammer. He of course shares the opinion of some other members of my local community who also used the same terminology when I was concerned.
I would ask members to visit this topic : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5265233.20 (https://archive.vn/lehNQ) and to tell me what they think of the member dkbit98 and his opinion that I am a signature spammer or his attitude in general when we speak of some solid facts?
Interestingly, the person in question shares an identical opinion with his colleague from the local board :
Translated : "Glad it helps you in your CM weekly quota"
I know that there is great envy and contempt for those who are members of the CM campaign, and dkbit98 is applied in same campaign few times (unsuccessful) just like his pal btcltcdigger - but that does not give them the right to call other signatures spammers.
Question I want to ask the members of this forum: In your opinion, is Lucius a person who only meets his signature quota, which would mean that he is a signature spammer, or are user comments like dkbit98 completely unfounded and inappropriate?
Local rule : dkbit98&btcltcdigger are not allowed to post here - their opinion is already quite familiar to me.
What particularly bothers me is that someone calls me a signature spammer, because I have never been one and I have zero tolerance for such people. Although I do not pay much attention to such things, I have been in a similar situation many times as today, so I think I should react and point out the somewhat strange behavior of a user who indirectly called me a signature spammer. He of course shares the opinion of some other members of my local community who also used the same terminology when I was concerned.
I would ask members to visit this topic : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5265233.20 (https://archive.vn/lehNQ) and to tell me what they think of the member dkbit98 and his opinion that I am a signature spammer or his attitude in general when we speak of some solid facts?
Interestingly, the person in question shares an identical opinion with his colleague from the local board :
Atleast you filled your signature quote mr.Right
Drago mi je da ti pomaze u tvojoj CM tjednoj kvoti
Translated : "Glad it helps you in your CM weekly quota"
I know that there is great envy and contempt for those who are members of the CM campaign, and dkbit98 is applied in same campaign few times (unsuccessful) just like his pal btcltcdigger - but that does not give them the right to call other signatures spammers.
Question I want to ask the members of this forum: In your opinion, is Lucius a person who only meets his signature quota, which would mean that he is a signature spammer, or are user comments like dkbit98 completely unfounded and inappropriate?
Local rule : dkbit98&btcltcdigger are not allowed to post here - their opinion is already quite familiar to me.
https://archive.vn/y8rRH
Jump to: