Unless the court interprets the intent...
https://www.dailydot.com/debug/child-porn-blockchain/
Topic: Lauda breaking forum rules ? (Read 1014 times)
I guess most of us are criminals in quite a few jurisdictions...
Unless the court interprets the intent...
https://www.dailydot.com/debug/child-porn-blockchain/
Unless the court interprets the intent...
https://www.dailydot.com/debug/child-porn-blockchain/
Quote
A Curacao license is valid in any jurisdiction where online gambling is legal
What have you smoked?
Its about gambling in general on this forum.
Its the double standard of the high ranked members claiming to protect forums member by tagging everyone for the lowest shit but when it comes to gambling they close their eyes and promote it themself because they get money for it.
See:Its the double standard of the high ranked members claiming to protect forums member by tagging everyone for the lowest shit but when it comes to gambling they close their eyes and promote it themself because they get money for it.
Betcoin.ag
BetKing.io
MoneyPot
JackpotRacer
and then the reply goes "DT members only tagged them because they didn't get paid"
First of all there is no false blame.These gambling websites have no licenses for major jurisdiction thats a fact nobody can deny.Its also a fact that people living in these jurisdictions are not allowed to advertise these gambling websites thats also a fact.
You trying to defame me that its about Lauda is just a poor try to slow down that thread.
Its about gambling in general on this forum.
Its the double standard of the high ranked members claiming to protect forums member by tagging everyone for the lowest shit but when it comes to gambling they close their eyes and promote it themself because they get money for it.
Thats a thread showing the pathetic behavior of these so called police member who are hunting abusers and protecting the community and at the same time advertise gambling to non licensed websites where you don't even know if these games are not staged.
You trying to defame me that its about Lauda is just a poor try to slow down that thread.
Its about gambling in general on this forum.
Its the double standard of the high ranked members claiming to protect forums member by tagging everyone for the lowest shit but when it comes to gambling they close their eyes and promote it themself because they get money for it.
Thats a thread showing the pathetic behavior of these so called police member who are hunting abusers and protecting the community and at the same time advertise gambling to non licensed websites where you don't even know if these games are not staged.
Do you even bother to read the T&C of gambling websites? A Curacao license is valid in any jurisdiction where online gambling is legal. Each online casino has list of jurisdictions where online gambling is illegal. By accepting the T&C you acknowledge that you are outside any of those jurisdictions.
You trying to defame me that its about Lauda is just a poor try to slow down that thread.
Its about gambling in general on this forum.
Your topic title is "Lauda breaking forum rules ?". ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
First of all there is no false blame.These gambling websites have no licenses for major jurisdiction thats a fact nobody can deny.Its also a fact that people living in these jurisdictions are not allowed to advertise these gambling websites thats also a fact.
You trying to defame me that its about Lauda is just a poor try to slow down that thread.
Its about gambling in general on this forum.
Its the double standard of the high ranked members claiming to protect forums member by tagging everyone for the lowest shit but when it comes to gambling they close their eyes and promote it themself because they get money for it.
Thats a thread showing the pathetic behavior of these so called police member who are hunting abusers and protecting the community and at the same time advertise gambling to non licensed websites where you don't even know if these games are not staged.
You trying to defame me that its about Lauda is just a poor try to slow down that thread.
Its about gambling in general on this forum.
Its the double standard of the high ranked members claiming to protect forums member by tagging everyone for the lowest shit but when it comes to gambling they close their eyes and promote it themself because they get money for it.
Thats a thread showing the pathetic behavior of these so called police member who are hunting abusers and protecting the community and at the same time advertise gambling to non licensed websites where you don't even know if these games are not staged.
OP can always contact iTech Labs and ask them about RNG certificates of certain sites. Actually, I am not sure what OP is trying to do here. Ban Lauda, ban advertisers, ban gambling sites...ban everyone?
Thats a good suggestion for OP i think. He isn't going to get any good result by doing this kind of meaningless thread. Everytime he put false blame on others and targetting same person. In real its not going to make any difference.
IMO he should stop now before new users starting to use their "Ignore" button specially for him.
OP can always contact iTech Labs and ask them about RNG certificates of certain sites. Actually, I am not sure what OP is trying to do here. Ban Lauda, ban advertisers, ban gambling sites...ban everyone?
The primary purpose was to get Lauda banned, or at least removed from DT. When it was pointed out to Thule that even Bitcointalk.org has a banner add for a gambling site, it switched to a campaign to ban gambling advertising. However, even if theymos implemented a ban, (which he won't,) I'm sure that he would give people plenty of warning so they could remove their sig advertisement. I'm sure Theymos doesn't want to ban a substantial amount of users on this forum.
OP can always contact iTech Labs and ask them about RNG certificates of certain sites. Actually, I am not sure what OP is trying to do here. Ban Lauda, ban advertisers, ban gambling sites...ban everyone?
In a licensed and governmental controled gambling websites these settings are defined by law to protect customers.
From what I've read, you think people can't become gambling addicts if they play in regulated casinos, even worst, you think people can't lose everything they have if they play in such casinos. Well that is just one big crazy assumption and it is completely wrong.I saw first hand, every single day I was at work... that none of this regulation made any difference whatsoever.
There were still people who couldn't afford the $10 carpark fee... others who were walking around approaching other patrons offering to sell handbags, phones, necklaces, rings so they could have $20 to gamble... others who would wander the casino for hours looking for 2c worth of credit left on a machine so they could either play it or try collecting it so they could make it up to $1 to cash out etc.
While I applaud your cry for consumer protection... attempting to use it as a "weapon" in your ongoing battle against certain forum members is just pure folly.
Maybe you can tell me what kind of probability setting have your advertised gambling website so people won't become addicts and won't lose their last underpants ?
In a licensed and governmental controled gambling websites these settings are defined by law to protect customers.
What about your gambling website ?What are their probability settings ?
From what I've read, you think people can't become gambling addicts if they play in regulated casinos, even worst, you think people can't lose everything they have if they play in such casinos. Well that is just one big crazy assumption and it is completely wrong.In a licensed and governmental controled gambling websites these settings are defined by law to protect customers.
What about your gambling website ?What are their probability settings ?
But keep going, it is funny to read your nonsense.
On my way home from work today I heard an ad on the radio for a betting site! Minors can't gamble! When I got home, I immediately called the government to complain, and request that all radio broadcasts be immediately banned. Then I turned on my TV and saw an advert for Bud Light! Minors can't drink! I phoned the government back to request all TV broadcasts be banned. I quickly checked Facebook and saw an advert for a BMW! Minors can't drive! I called the government. I decided to read the newspaper instead, and saw adverts for a local wedding shop, estate agent, and tattoo parlor! Minors can't get married, buy property, or get a tattoo! Tried phoning the government again, but turns out they've blocked my number. I've emailed them instead.
That very nicely points out the absurdity of OP's argument. Not that I think for one minute that he's being sincere or thinking about anything aside from his hatred of Lauda, but if he was, this is how silly his requests becomes. Well done. 
It's biggest nonsense that I read today. Why do you want to ban Lauda only? Lauda is the only person on this forum who promote gambling website? Following your logic half of forum should be banned. BTW, things like Bitcoin or ICO's is also illegal in some countries. So, users who promote ICO's also should be banned if it's illegal in their country?
And are you sure that gambling is illegal in Lauda's country?
Anyway, your accussation is useless because this rule is about marketplace - it's not allowed to sell illegal things on Bitcointalk like drugs and similar stuff. Signature advertisements ≠ marketplace
And are you sure that gambling is illegal in Lauda's country?
Anyway, your accussation is useless because this rule is about marketplace - it's not allowed to sell illegal things on Bitcointalk like drugs and similar stuff. Signature advertisements ≠ marketplace
Don't worry, Thule is now asking to ban all gambling advertising (sorry, I can't be bothered to post a link but you'll find it in Meta).
If only he could channel all this energy into something productive. Or at least get laid and stop fucking around the forum.
@Flying Hellfish
and claim to protect bitcointalk members.....
and claim to protect bitcointalk members.....
@ Stupid Twat
It is not my job to protect anyone, it's not my job to hold your hand or be nice to anyone, it's your job to protect yourself, don't like it too fucking bad, call the cops, go away or keep crying like you have sand in your pussy, it all leads to the same place for you, no where!
BTW I am in Canada and online gambling is NOT illegal in my country, but hey as I mentioned feel free to call the cops, I will even give you the phone number for the RCMP if you can't find it!
It's biggest nonsense that I read today. Why do you want to ban Lauda only? Lauda is the only person on this forum who promote gambling website? Following your logic half of forum should be banned. BTW, things like Bitcoin or ICO's is also illegal in some countries. So, users who promote ICO's also should be banned if it's illegal in their country?
And are you sure that gambling is illegal in Lauda's country?
Anyway, your accussation is useless because this rule is about marketplace - it's not allowed to sell illegal things on Bitcointalk like drugs and similar stuff. Signature advertisements ≠ marketplace
And are you sure that gambling is illegal in Lauda's country?
Anyway, your accussation is useless because this rule is about marketplace - it's not allowed to sell illegal things on Bitcointalk like drugs and similar stuff. Signature advertisements ≠ marketplace
[How can I be a pedophile when I'm only 15? 
i didnt call you pedophile i just quoted thats person's mean
i called you stupid asshole and it's true
that not strange when you calling troll someone that show you your mistakes and your stupid troubles
its not necessary for me to learn english better when i speak in 8 languages without translator
you see my grammar mistakes but you so stupid coz you not see mechanical mistakes
anyway) all of this shit is your own problem
may be you mean this?
there is too much feeds to show how you stupid asshole
How can I be a pedophile when I'm only 15? Quote
THIS PERSON IS A PEDOPHILE ! HE WAS ALREADY REPORTED TO RELATED FACEBOOK PAGE. PLEASE REPORT THIS PERSON TO POLICE AND FBI. SEE THE REFERRAL LINK FOR DETAILS. THANK YOU!
there is too much feeds to show how you stupid asshole
Those are mighty strong words you're using. If only you spent as much time learning English as you did trolling, perhaps you would be able to formulate a proper sentence.
I think he means house edge but let him rant on, this is quite funny.
Interestingly enough, I did have a thread discussing the effects of higher house edge: that it was inversely proportional to the number of problem gamblers created. ~
I think he means house edge but let him rant on, this is quite funny.
Not sure why you want to show off how your trust list affects their profile.
I can easily adjust my trust settings to show any user as severely negative. In fact, if a user isn't negative enough in one's perspective, it's simple enough to create alt accounts to flame them with negative feedback and add them to one's trust list. Not that this has any real effect if the feedback is without substance.
I can easily adjust my trust settings to show any user as severely negative. In fact, if a user isn't negative enough in one's perspective, it's simple enough to create alt accounts to flame them with negative feedback and add them to one's trust list. Not that this has any real effect if the feedback is without substance.
may be you mean this?
Quote
THIS PERSON IS A PEDOPHILE ! HE WAS ALREADY REPORTED TO RELATED FACEBOOK PAGE. PLEASE REPORT THIS PERSON TO POLICE AND FBI. SEE THE REFERRAL LINK FOR DETAILS. THANK YOU!
or this ?
Quote
Send negative feedback to a user for sending merits to people without even understanding the content of the posts or the context of why the user did send merits to these users.
Don't trust his feedbacks or verify them.
Don't trust his feedbacks or verify them.
there is too much feeds to show how you stupid asshole
@Flying Hellfish
Since you as staff are activly promoting gambling without license on this forum and claim to protect bitcointalk members.....
Maybe you can tell me what kind of probability setting have your advertised gambling website so people won't become addicts and won't lose their last underpants ?
In a licensed and governmental controled gambling websites these settings are defined by law to protect customers.
What about your gambling website ?What are their probability settings ?
I highly doubt you know them.
Since you as staff are activly promoting gambling without license on this forum and claim to protect bitcointalk members.....
Maybe you can tell me what kind of probability setting have your advertised gambling website so people won't become addicts and won't lose their last underpants ?
In a licensed and governmental controled gambling websites these settings are defined by law to protect customers.
What about your gambling website ?What are their probability settings ?
I highly doubt you know them.
@Flying Hellfish
Since you as staff are activly promoting gambling without license on this forum and claim to protect bitcointalk members.....
Maybe you can tell me what kind of probability setting have your advertised gambling website so people won't become addicts and won't lose their last underpants ?
In a licensed and governmental controled gambling websites these settings are defined by law to protect customers.
What about your gambling website ?What are their probability settings ?
I highly doubt you know them.
Since you as staff are activly promoting gambling without license on this forum and claim to protect bitcointalk members.....
Maybe you can tell me what kind of probability setting have your advertised gambling website so people won't become addicts and won't lose their last underpants ?
In a licensed and governmental controled gambling websites these settings are defined by law to protect customers.
What about your gambling website ?What are their probability settings ?
I highly doubt you know them.
Jump to: