Sign a message with:
12wDRLTdLcjxWRBm4pXT1G3sXb5aoqfaVa,cripperz,https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=30185
Topic: Lauda gave negative feedback for no valid reason - page 2. (Read 1167 times)
I got negative feedback from Lauda without breaking any rules. This is just wrong as I helped many people here since 2011 and knew about Bitcoin before even she did. Who does she think she is to act like she can ban old members like me just for updating security info?
She claimed my account is "likely hacked" because I updated my email and password recently. Where is the scam accusation if this is not my account?
Edit: Lauda only joined this forum in 2013. I have been here since 2011 and helping people with mining. When a mod reads my post tell her she needs to delete this fake negative trust.
She claimed my account is "likely hacked" because I updated my email and password recently. Where is the scam accusation if this is not my account?
Edit: Lauda only joined this forum in 2013. I have been here since 2011 and helping people with mining. When a mod reads my post tell her she needs to delete this fake negative trust.
I Think what Lauda is doing is putting a pre cautionary feedback on your account. on the feedback that he gave reasons where clearly stated and I believe it is disputable you just need to prove that his assumption is not true.
What he is doing kinda help to avoid scamming in the forum.
Pre cautionary feedback is neutral, not negative. If you want to put neutral I could understand, but negative when I didn't scam is just plain wrong.
Edit: Well I got no address anyway, looks my account is forever lost.
Almost no one looks at Neutrals nor will the user likely respond to accusations. If you had been here as long as you say, you should know that. Lauda did the right thing here.
Find an addy and sign a message and the Negative will be removed.
I got negative feedback from Lauda without breaking any rules. This is just wrong as I helped many people here since 2011 and knew about Bitcoin before even she did. Who does she think she is to act like she can ban old members like me just for updating security info?
She claimed my account is "likely hacked" because I updated my email and password recently. Where is the scam accusation if this is not my account?
Edit: Lauda only joined this forum in 2013. I have been here since 2011 and helping people with mining. When a mod reads my post tell her she needs to delete this fake negative trust.
She claimed my account is "likely hacked" because I updated my email and password recently. Where is the scam accusation if this is not my account?
Edit: Lauda only joined this forum in 2013. I have been here since 2011 and helping people with mining. When a mod reads my post tell her she needs to delete this fake negative trust.
I Think what Lauda is doing is putting a pre cautionary feedback on your account. on the feedback that he gave reasons where clearly stated and I believe it is disputable you just need to prove that his assumption is not true.
What he is doing kinda help to avoid scamming in the forum.
Pre cautionary feedback is neutral, not negative. If you want to put neutral I could understand, but negative when I didn't scam is just plain wrong.
Edit: Well I got no address anyway, looks my account is forever lost.
I got negative feedback from Lauda without breaking any rules. This is just wrong as I helped many people here since 2011 and knew about Bitcoin before even she did. Who does she think she is to act like she can ban old members like me just for updating security info?
She claimed my account is "likely hacked" because I updated my email and password recently. Where is the scam accusation if this is not my account?
Edit: Lauda only joined this forum in 2013. I have been here since 2011 and helping people with mining. When a mod reads my post tell her she needs to delete this fake negative trust.
She claimed my account is "likely hacked" because I updated my email and password recently. Where is the scam accusation if this is not my account?
Edit: Lauda only joined this forum in 2013. I have been here since 2011 and helping people with mining. When a mod reads my post tell her she needs to delete this fake negative trust.
I Think what Lauda is doing is putting a pre cautionary feedback on your account. on the feedback that he gave reasons where clearly stated and I believe it is disputable you just need to prove that his assumption is not true.
What he is doing kinda help to avoid scamming in the forum.
Pre cautionary feedback is neutral, not negative. If you want to put neutral I could understand, but negative when I didn't scam is just plain wrong.
Edit: Well I got no address anyway, looks my account is forever lost.
I got negative feedback from Lauda without breaking any rules. This is just wrong as I helped many people here since 2011 and knew about Bitcoin before even she did. Who does she think she is to act like she can ban old members like me just for updating security info?
She claimed my account is "likely hacked" because I updated my email and password recently. Where is the scam accusation if this is not my account?
Edit: Lauda only joined this forum in 2013. I have been here since 2011 and helping people with mining. When a mod reads my post tell her she needs to delete this fake negative trust.
She claimed my account is "likely hacked" because I updated my email and password recently. Where is the scam accusation if this is not my account?
Edit: Lauda only joined this forum in 2013. I have been here since 2011 and helping people with mining. When a mod reads my post tell her she needs to delete this fake negative trust.
I Think what Lauda is doing is putting a pre cautionary feedback on your account. on the feedback that he gave reasons where clearly stated and I believe it is disputable you just need to prove that his assumption is not true.
What he is doing kinda help to avoid scamming in the forum.
I got negative feedback from Lauda without breaking any rules. This is just wrong as I helped many people here since 2011 and knew about Bitcoin before even she did. Who does she think she is to act like she can ban old members like me just for updating security info?
She claimed my account is "likely hacked" because I updated my email and password recently. Where is the scam accusation if this is not my account?
Edit: Lauda only joined this forum in 2013. I have been here since 2011 and helping people with mining. When a mod reads my post tell her she needs to delete this fake negative trust.
She claimed my account is "likely hacked" because I updated my email and password recently. Where is the scam accusation if this is not my account?
Edit: Lauda only joined this forum in 2013. I have been here since 2011 and helping people with mining. When a mod reads my post tell her she needs to delete this fake negative trust.
The date you signed up is irrelevant really, so don't try to use that as some kind of points scoring. There have been dozens of hacked accounts recently, most of them are from early accounts where the real owners have long forgotten about them. Lots of accounts have also been sold with the rise in bitcoin price. All that being said, while it is suspicious to change the email and password at the same time, I'm not sure people should be penalized for it without extra proof.
Throwing tamper tantrums is not going to help you gain any credibility.
this should be on reputation board (maybe).
Because a lot hacked account always change email and password. I think you can contact lauda and give proof if you still own your account. Ex: sign message from your old address.
Because a lot hacked account always change email and password. I think you can contact lauda and give proof if you still own your account. Ex: sign message from your old address.
I got negative feedback from Lauda without breaking any rules. This is just wrong as I helped many people here since 2011 and knew about Bitcoin before even she did. Who does she think she is to act like she can ban old members like me just for updating security info?
She claimed my account is "likely hacked" because I updated my email and password recently. Where is the scam accusation if this is not my account?
Edit: Lauda only joined this forum in 2013. I have been here since 2011 and helping people with mining. When a mod reads my post tell her she needs to delete this fake negative trust.
She claimed my account is "likely hacked" because I updated my email and password recently. Where is the scam accusation if this is not my account?
Edit: Lauda only joined this forum in 2013. I have been here since 2011 and helping people with mining. When a mod reads my post tell her she needs to delete this fake negative trust.
Jump to: