Pages:
Author

Topic: Lauda using red trust as a weapon to silence those differ from her politically (Read 664 times)

legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1117

But the case is different with the extreme-leftist cabal led by Lauda. If they notice that someone is on the opposite side of the political divide, then they'll use the silliest reasons to nuke that account.


lauda is everything or nothing. but 100% not on the left wing.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Living proof here. I have bought 3 other accounts in 2016 and accepted it, now and even then, never did any abuse, never put two accounts in a signature campaign, yet here I am with Lauda and his army tagging the hell out of me , but I don't care, just wanted to point out that there are people who have accepted to have more than 1 account, and I already abandoned all of them since long time.

Your trust ratings seem to disagree with that narrative. One of your reds is for self-vouching for example.

It is still in the same time I bought the accounts.I don't do it from ages.Just wanted to show that 90% of DT do wrong here intentionally.Cheers.

But you're claiming that you "never did any abuse" in response to EcuaMobi asking if anybody has been red-trusted merely for having alts. You've been red-trusted for what can be considered abuse, not just for having alts.
copper member
Activity: 1442
Merit: 529
Living proof here. I have bought 3 other accounts in 2016 and accepted it, now and even then, never did any abuse, never put two accounts in a signature campaign, yet here I am with Lauda and his army tagging the hell out of me , but I don't care, just wanted to point out that there are people who have accepted to have more than 1 account, and I already abandoned all of them since long time.

Your trust ratings seem to disagree with that narrative. One of your reds is for self-vouching for example.

It is still in the same time I bought the accounts.I don't do it from ages.Just wanted to show that 90% of DT do wrong here intentionally.Cheers.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Living proof here. I have bought 3 other accounts in 2016 and accepted it, now and even then, never did any abuse, never put two accounts in a signature campaign, yet here I am with Lauda and his army tagging the hell out of me , but I don't care, just wanted to point out that there are people who have accepted to have more than 1 account, and I already abandoned all of them since long time.

Your trust ratings seem to disagree with that narrative. One of your reds is for self-vouching for example.
copper member
Activity: 1442
Merit: 529
Are you people serious or crazy ?  Every connected account is tagged in this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/known-alts-of-any-one-a-user-generated-list-mk-iii-2021-q2-2544574 ( Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List )  and not all alts accounts are on same campaign, yet tagged.   Cheesy
That should not be the case. Of course having multiple accounts doesn't deserve negative trust. However abuse does.
Do provide an example of accounts being tagged just for belonging to the same person, without any abuse.

Living proof here. I have bought 3 other accounts in 2016 and accepted it, now and even then, never did any abuse, never put two accounts in a signature campaign, yet here I am with Lauda and his army tagging the hell out of me , but I don't care, just wanted to point out that there are people who have accepted to have more than 1 account, and I already abandoned all of them since long time.
legendary
Activity: 2800
Merit: 2736
Farewell LEO: o_e_l_e_o

Are you people serious or crazy ?  Every connected account is tagged in this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/known-alts-of-any-one-a-user-generated-list-mk-iii-2021-q2-2544574 ( Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List )  and not all alts accounts are on same campaign, yet tagged.   Cheesy

I will repeat EcuaMobi

And additionally, I would suggest to create a new topic about it. Bring on the accounts those were tagged but did not abuse the system. Everyone will be treated the same.
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1475
Are you people serious or crazy ?  Every connected account is tagged in this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/known-alts-of-any-one-a-user-generated-list-mk-iii-2021-q2-2544574 ( Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List )  and not all alts accounts are on same campaign, yet tagged.   Cheesy
That should not be the case. Of course having multiple accounts doesn't deserve negative trust. However abuse does.
Do provide an example of accounts being tagged just for belonging to the same person, without any abuse.
sr. member
Activity: 1002
Merit: 254
Tontogether | Save Smart & Win Big
I don't remember why the ratings on those two users are removed nor who you are.

-snip-

You can have multiple account in the forum however you can not be in the same signature campaign with your alts. Also you can not send merit to your alts.

-snip-
Are you people serious or crazy ?  Every connected account is tagged in this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/known-alts-of-any-one-a-user-generated-list-mk-iii-2021-q2-2544574 ( Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List )  and not all alts accounts are on same campaign, yet tagged.   Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2800
Merit: 2736
Farewell LEO: o_e_l_e_o
Trying?  I believe you just did bring it here.  Smiley
Come on brother 🤔
I did not bring it, I pointed my finger in it; in your first post on this topic.
to improve the forum situation than OG is...
🙂
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
Lauda has removed the red trust.  I sincerely believe Lauda is doing more to improve the forum situation than OG is...
Vod, this is childish. You are trying to bring your personal issue with OG here. As far as I know there is already a separate topic for it and you both are going well with it.
[/quote]

Trying?  I believe you just did bring it here.  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2800
Merit: 2736
Farewell LEO: o_e_l_e_o
I don't remember why the ratings on those two users are removed nor who you are.
@ bryant.coleman, has an active alt 2 legendary account.
Who is currently in the sig campaign.

Connected account:

1. bryant. coleman
2. Netnox

Archive: http://archive.is/zCnkI#selection-7877.4-7877.82

Profile bryant.coleman: http://archive.is/zr73Z
Profile Netnox: http://archive.is/6n5yc


You can have multiple account in the forum however you can not be in the same signature campaign with your alts. Also you can not send merit to your alts.

Do you have any evidences of this kind of abuses?


Lauda has removed the red trust.  I sincerely believe Lauda is doing more to improve the forum situation than OG is...
Vod, this is childish. You are trying to bring your personal issue with OG here. As far as I know there is already a separate topic for it and you both are going well with it.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
Seven months back, I was red trusted by Lauda

Lauda has removed the red trust.  I sincerely believe Lauda is doing more to improve the forum situation than OG is...
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
I don't remember why the ratings on those two users are removed nor who you are.
@ bryant.coleman, has an active alt 2 legendary account.
Who is currently in the sig campaign.
Links, proof?
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1775
I don't remember why the ratings on those two users are removed nor who you are.
@ bryant.coleman, has an active alt 2 legendary account.
Who is currently in the sig campaign.

Links, proof?
Connected account:

1. bryant. coleman
2. Netnox

Bitcointalk username:  bryant.coleman
Forum rank: Legendary
Posts count:  17,858
ETH address: 0xe51DA78489683Baf87F043dCB8b86B6f29cEF326

http://archive.is/UnAjL

Twitter username: @Axwrhy
Twitter URL: https://twitter.com/Axwrhy

http://archive.is/HNLHo

A link to your Twitter account: https://twitter.com/Axwrhy

http://archive.is/NJALX
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
But the case is different with the extreme-leftist cabal led by Lauda.
There aren't enough facepalms on the interwebs to respond to this.



I don't remember why the ratings on those two users are removed nor who you are.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
I have seen the reference and the fact 2 other accounts received negative trust and then got it removed. My first guess was they recognized their offence and promised not to do it again.
I get you're frustrated but you can't accuse her of abusing the trust system for political views if you don't have any proof whatsoever. At least you didn't leave a fake retaliation negative as a lot of users do.
You should try calmly explaining your case instead of attacking and making false accusations. That would be a much better approach.

That being said, I will leave a counter positive trust on your profile unless I get more information from Lauda or somebody else that makes me change my mind.

Immediately after realizing that I had violated the forum policies against bumping / spamming, I had apologized. Yeah... accusing of political vendetta may backfire on me. People may ignore the merit of my complaint and concentrate on that part. But it is frustrating, to be part of the forum for so long (back in 2015-16, I was among the top-10 users with the maximum post count) and then the account getting destroyed for one mistake.
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1989
฿uy ฿itcoin
As per the forum policies, red trust is a punishment given to those who try to scam others. Most of the admins here are unbiased, and use red trust only when there is sufficient proof that an user is trying to scam someone.

But the case is different with the extreme-leftist cabal led by Lauda. If they notice that someone is on the opposite side of the political divide, then they'll use the silliest reasons to nuke that account.

Seven months back, I was red trusted by Lauda, for bumping the ANN thread. I wasn't trying to scam, and explained it to her. But no use. As per the forum rules, thread bumping and spamming are not liable for red trust. At the most, they can be banned for 7 days or 14 days. But Lauda makes her own rules and used this as an excuse to destroy my account. And my case is very unique. Others who did the same escaped without any punishment, and I was the only one who received red trust.

I joined this forum way back in 2012 and no matter how insignificant it was, I also played my part in popularizing this forum. Back then, the admins respected freedom of speech and were unbiased. I had no black mark here until this admin gave me red trust.

I am not begging anyone to remove my red trust, because I know that it was given to me in an unfair manner. I am making this post, to make others aware of what is going on here. For the past 2-3 years, this forum has become a place to bully and blackmail, thanks to certain high ranking users.

Bringing politics into this is straight up nonsense. When was the last time you contacted Lauda about this?
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1475
If you check the reference link, then it can be seen that me, as well as two junior members were accused of the same "crime". In the end I was red-tagged, while the other two were let-off. I couldn't find any other possible explanation other than my political views.

I don't have an issue if she is red-tagging everyone who is bumping the ANN threads. That's not happening. Only a few people are getting tagged for this. If there is such a rule, then it should be applicable for everyone irrespective of their rank or reputation. Either she should tag everyone who bumps the threads, or she should not tag anyone who does that.

I am not making this post in order to get my red trust removed. I don't think that I'll ever receive fair treatment here. I am making this post so that Lauda will think twice before nuking the accounts of other people.
I have seen the reference and the fact 2 other accounts received negative trust and then got it removed. My first guess was they recognized their offence and promised not to do it again.
I get you're frustrated but you can't accuse her of abusing the trust system for political views if you don't have any proof whatsoever. At least you didn't leave a fake retaliation negative as a lot of users do.
You should try calmly explaining your case instead of attacking and making false accusations. That would be a much better approach.

That being said, I will leave a counter positive trust on your profile unless I get more information from Lauda or somebody else that makes me change my mind.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
OP, why are you accusing Lauda of "silence those differ from her politically" instead of just being too harsh? What political difference do you think you have? What hidden motivations are you accusing her of having?

If you check the reference link, then it can be seen that me, as well as two junior members were accused of the same "crime". In the end I was red-tagged, while the other two were let-off. I couldn't find any other possible explanation other than my political views.

I don't have an issue if she is red-tagging everyone who is bumping the ANN threads. That's not happening. Only a few people are getting tagged for this. If there is such a rule, then it should be applicable for everyone irrespective of their rank or reputation. Either she should tag everyone who bumps the threads, or she should not tag anyone who does that.

I am not making this post in order to get my red trust removed. I don't think that I'll ever receive fair treatment here. I am making this post so that Lauda will think twice before nuking the accounts of other people.

legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 2223
Signature space for rent
I have remembered your case clearly. Don't always give reference of forum rules, its limited use. Where is limit if rules there is apply of trust.

However, I think your feedback's is excusable and you should follow this thread , this isn't subject discuss on meta, so please move it on reputation. Your greedy behaviour turn your account in red. As a legendary you should know the rules bumping service is against forum rules. Why that time you forgot about rules and now you are using rules reference once you got tag.

You don't need to begging, you just need to provide valid reason why are you think your feedback's is unfair. That's it.

Conclusion: Lauda should reconsider that negative feedback of OP since I believe this is excusable mistake and OP got lesson from it.
Pages:
Jump to: