How are we going to determine worse projects?
* no used-case
* questionable developers
* not back-up with a reputable exchanges
* no market volume
If one of them had fallen into such a category of mine, don't dare to invest and even have the plan too as for sure you will just lose your money. Choosing coins for investment really matter as this will affect the results of it.
Good point, we can't speculate which project is worst out of 5 coins list for future, project list is better hidden as speculating based on above points for next few years, we can't decide for worst project but you can do your research and analysis to sort the list of 5 coins, I excluded Matic and AAVE coins for the worst coin list above.
Everyone must have their own choices for the worst projects, because not everyone's research and analysis results are the same. Therefore,
there is no need for other people's opinions to determine which projects are bad, because it is not necessarily a project that other people think is
bad, for us is considered bad too. Unless we all have the same method of determining bad projects, although sometimes everyone has their own
method of determining a bad project.
As an example for me Shiba Inu project is bad and not worth buying, but there are some people who think Shiba Inu has a great future and is
the best meme coins after Dogecoin. So please decide for yourself the worst projects in our opinion, it will be much better to do. But for me
instead of looking for the worst projects, why don't we focus on finding the best projects, so our time is used more effectively. But if I had to
choose between 5 altcoins in the pool, I would choose Moonbeam the worst. My answer is simple, because I am not very familiar with Moonbeam
and Moonbeam is not included in the top 100 crypto.