Topic: Ledger Nano X - Review of the package. (Read 385 times)

Damn, 10% for each transaction is a deal-breaker for me. I was expecting 5% or so. While I won't use it every day, it stills doesn't sound good. I might as well wait for a better product and stick with my mobile wallet for now. Thanks for the review guys.

I think each transaction will consume about 10-15% of the battery, which actually matches what users write on Ledger Reddit. But obviously there are some issues with the battery, which, as I mentioned before, is of very low capacity and may not be of top quality.

Also, although Ledger initially marketed the Nano X as a device that can have up to 8 hours of battery life (in using), i think it still depends on what we actually do with the device when it's on the battery. Obviously, transactions consume battery faster, and it may also depend on the coin apps we use.

Unfortunately, I did not get any kind of information about that. The support only declared that both devices were faulty after seeing my recordings of the wallets and a watch alongside them.


If you don't keep your device turned on needlessly (meaning you turn it on after preparing your transaction) then it should last for quite a few transactions. I can't give you the exact number since both of my devices were faulty (the first one seemed to work fine at the beginning).


If also you don't want to carry around your laptop then it's a great choice. Their mobile app is fairly good.

How many times you guys can use the Nano X before the battery needs to be recharged? Is it that bad?

I'm thinking of getting one because I might travel a lot in the next few months and don't want to carry my Nano S around.

BitCryptex, sorry for the late reply

I'm sorry you're having problems, I have not noticed such problems so far, but I must admit that I have not used Nano X too much. I've checked for similar issues on Ledger Reddit, and I see there are those who complain about the same problem. I can only say that the battery is too weak (100 mAh), which is certainly a problem for those who want more autonomy with Bluetooth.

Did you get any official response from Ledger about what is causing such fast discharging of battery?

How is your experience with the Nano X so far? I have already returned my device twice due to faulty battery. Both devices were discharging at an incredibly high rate. Since the replacement is supposed to arrive today, I am thinking about selling it even though everything else seemed to be working fine.

This is the time of year when the biggest discounts can be expected, and of course, it should be used and saved as much money as possible. You made a small mistake because you overlooked Black Friday, but also the discounts that Ledger has for Christmas&New Year holidays. This year with the purchased Nano X, Ledger is giving away the Nano S for free. But the most important thing is that you have increased the security of your assets, it is certainly worth some extra money

Ledger Christmas Pack

It doesn't have to be the one that is sold by Ledger and yes it is overpriced, I agree. I was just trying to make a point that I prefer cable connections over wireless. Buying cheap and unknown cables made me think of the USBHarpoon > https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/usbharpoon-a-charging-cable-that-can-hack-your-computer-5186863
We now live in an age where something like this is not science-fiction but very possible to happen so we should be careful what we use.   

Feeling jealous, lol. So you grab the opportunity of Black Friday. I bought backup pack before few days back from Black Friday offer. Anyway good to see that you have saved 35%  . Actually I forgot about Black Friday before place order. Anyway just missed discount but I received my product on time.

My experience is good with Ledger X, and I am using it lately for store fund. Really nice design and especially I like bluetooth connection featured. Even it could be use through mobile phone without any cable connections. So your fund with you any where your are if device with you. No need to wait when you will sit on your computer.

The Ledger OTG Kit is hideously overpriced and pointless... ANY OTG adapter will do the job... like the $1 with free shipping one that I got from AliExpress

The only advantage that the Ledger one has is that it is just a single "male to male" cable, whereas most other OTG adapters are micro USB (or USB-C) male to standard USB female... but then they have the added advantage of being able to accept flash drives, mice, keyboards etc.

All depends what you want to achieve I guess... but personally, I wouldn't bother with the Ledger kit.

I guess I am a bit old-school but I still prefer connections via cable rather than wireless ones like via Bluetooth. The Ledger OTG Kit is still the way to go if you ask me. Bluetooth connections are not really my thing. I am not paranoid by nature but I don't really like it when it comes to my financials. It provides another window of opportunities.

I pre-ordered the dual package last year during a promotional run when the price was attractive.  I didn't own a model S at the time, so the extra cost seemed worth it.

The fact that the Ledger is not prone to physical attacks (none that we know of, anyway) like the competitors, and the X's bluetooth capability made it seem like a practical mobile wallet to carry around while traveling.  The difference in size between the X and S isn't a big deal, in my opinion.  The X is still fairly compact, no bigger than a cigarette lighter or many other items people often keep in their pockets.  I was really intrigued by the idea of a wireless connection to my phone, which I must admit I've yet to utilize. 

Would a Nano S have sufficed for me?  The answer is overwhelmingly yes.  I don't need to use my phone for crypto, as I almost always have a computer with me, even when I travel.  I don't own many altcoins, in fact the only reason I own ETH is to provide another popular coin for my lending service.  The difference in price can seem negligible for some of us, and if you just want the latest and greatest you won't be disappointed.

I don't expect the Nano S to lose support from Ledger anytime soon, so for my needs it doesn't seem like it'll become obsolete in the foreseeable future.

I would say the Nano X is worth the extra cost if you own a lot of altcoins and interact with them regularly, or you use your phone as your primary device to access your assets.

Who can tell how technology will evolve in the future, we can only speculate on it. But without a doubt, the Nano X is something Ledger will build on all the new features, and I think for the S model it will not be possible due to limitations of storage. At this point, it doesn't seem too important, but investing in new technology always pays off.

Nano X is a good investment for people who want to have many coin apps at the same time, and for those who like idea of wireless connectivity. Some will also buy it because they like the design, or just because it's something new.

What kind of features could that be? I never thought about this, and certainly this can be an interesting perspective. However, I can't think of anything other than more coins support, which doesn't interests me.

Maybe some better integration with some crazy smartcontract in ethereum in the future.. However for now my nano integrates perfectly with metamask, electrum, mycrypto, mew, TRON, etc etc...

In ledgerI miss an integration with Steem. But that~s ok, i can live with it lol

I know how you feel, there was something similar in my case, and by the last moment I was thinking of buying it or not, but on the last day Ledger offered an additional 5% discount and with a total of 35% off it was an irresistible offer. As I say in my previous posts, I just want to have extra HW in case my Nano S breaks down.

I know that that I could buy 2 Nano S for the price of one X, but I consider this purchase an investment in the future. The Nano S is a good HW, but unfortunately, it has limited storage that will prevent Ledger to add some new features in the future. It is possible that Ledger will offer another promotional sale like last year, and that the discounts will be even greater.

---

Sorry, I completely forgot to answer you. Regarding the metal part (it is not plastic 100%) that covers the device, it is definitely noticeable that it is more massive and thicker on X then on S model. Also, the finish is not glossy/polished on X as it is on S, it may even be some new material. I hope we both think on the same part here.

If you think on seals on the box, there is no such thing - it is just Ledger box wrapped in a plastic transparent wrap. I buy new phone few months ago, one of the top models (Huawei), but I got it the same as Nano X, no extra protection so you can see has anyone opened the package before you.

---

But I have something for you and others, how about free Nano X and Nano S? In total 100 hardware wallets + XTZ in new Ledger contest

https://www.ledger.com/contest-tezos

Grrr....OP, you're making me jealous.  I would love to get my grubby little paws on a Nano X, but I just can't justify the expense right now.  Every time I see a thread about it, my mouth starts to water.  I won't call it drooling, but it's close.

Good review and I'm glad you included pics of everything.

Yeah, I'm in the same boat.  I love my Ledger Nano S to death and don't need to upgrade but I would in a heartbeat if I got the X.  Even though Ledger had the black Friday sale, I really wanted the To The Moon edition and that wasn't part of the sale.  I think I might have gone against my better judgement and bought it if it was at a discount.

I knew that Nano X have bigger screen, but I didn't thought that whole device is bigger. And it's nice to see that Ledger improved package content. Translations is very important thing. Snd now I see that they give 3 recovery sheets. When I bought Nano S, I got just one sheet.
From these languages I only understand Russian, though I'm not native speaker. But for me translation looks normal. As Lucius said, these few sentences is very basic and probably even Google Translate don't fail to translate it.
Idea for business - make rugged versions of Hardware wallets. Waterproof also would be good

@Lucius

The part that covers the device, (I don't know if it's aluminum or plastic. lol) does it seem more solid to you than the Nano S or it's the same thickness?
This part is fragile like an egg. One of my devices fell, surely for the first time, and the part is distorted and ready to go to the bin.

And secondly, do they still use the shining seals? (sorry I don't know how it's called in English, nor in my language xd, Like when you buy a new phone unboxed

I will mention again that this is a review of the contents of the package, and the size/weight/thickness of the Nano X compared with the Nano S. As for the cost-effectiveness and advantages of the new model over the old model, all is said before. I simply wanted to try a new device, and in case my old Nano S breaks down I will have the second device.

Which translation do you find problematic/inaccurate? This is a very simple instruction that can not be much different in translation even if you use Google Translate. I cannot comment on Japanese, Chinese, or Korean accuracy of the translation, but the translations of all the other languages seem fairly accurate. What I certainly think is positive is that the company changed its approach, two years ago the contents of the package were quite poor, with only three papers, only in English.

I would like to comment on this part. It seems that the company is negligently in dealing with this aspect.
Depending on the local language translation of this image --> https://i.imgur.com/nLJmWKk.jpg, I think they are using Google Translate without validating it.
Can anyone confirm the quality of translation for the rest of the languages?

Instead of 11 languages, the user can request the device with a choice of three languages, English in addition to two languages that he chooses.