Hi guys - thank you for your activity a clearly an interest in our brand. Since you are going trough Terms and Conditions.
We appreciate it.
Welcome to bitcointalk platform. It is nice having you here. I have gone through your website and I must say you have a good UI and graphics. At first i noticed you already registered a copper membership which shows you are a good listener and this further tells you are as well a good communicator and manager and i would like to call your attention to your posts here that you do not spam your own thread but rather you quote reply all in one thread so as not to occupy it all alone with single reply one for one. Quote replying on one post would help make your thread coordinated and well presentable.
Thanks for the suggestion - will do this right now
BTCThis policy is in place to discourage players from being inactive or ignoring important messages from our platform.
But, as long you give the information/make updates to the public.
IMO, If they do not make the update by themself you are not wrong at all. As always they should be aware of what platform they're using, I read the fees are deducted from the account customer.
That's mean, If the account already inactive but doesn't have any balance left on the account you cannot deduct the fee right? due there is no balance to be deducted from the account. Maybe make another note, only for accounts that still have a balance left in the platform.
As per our written policy - we do not make an account to go below zero. Neither there is and hidden accumulation of the fee.
If any player decides to deposit after a year or more of inactivity, we consider this an account reactivation and he/she has again a year without any deduction.
Additionally any player is entitled to explain his case to our support and we can evaluate exceptions on one-to-one basis. So reversal is possible.BTCwelcome to the forum, your casino has a very nice design. but he has a very dangerous TOS. I will speak of the parts where I see that they are a great danger for all people who use your casino.
KYC Policy of PWN Technologies N.V.
When a user makes an aggregate lifetime total of deposits exceeding EUR 2000 or requests a withdrawal of any amount inside leetbit.io Platform, then it is compulsory for them to perform a full KYC process.
source:
https://www.leetbit.io/en/pages/kycthat means people can put money in your casino they have no problem with that, they will only have problem if they deposit more than 2000$ and when they want to make any money withdrawal, but if they deposit 1000$ and they play and lose money in your casino, so it's ok, if they deposit 100 euros and win in some game and with that they have 300 euros, they need to keep playing until they lose or they need to provide documents to make the withdrawal, because the only problem is at the time of the withdrawal, in the time they deposit 100 euros there is no problem
this is because it was the license provider who said that you should do things this way, but I would like to ask the following:
Can you show license documents where the license provider says they should let people deposit money, but when withdrawing they should force them to do kyc? I confess that I am very curious to see this, and that in recent months new casinos and some with 2 years of existence have used this argument that it was the license provider who said that they should let people make deposits and at the time of withdrawal ask for kyc . now in case it wasn't the license provider that forced your casino to allow people to make deposits but then prevents people from making withdrawals because they must comply with kyc, then I ask you: why don't they force people to make kyc before making any deposit?
by doing this all the people who used your casino would first go through kyc and only after that they could make a deposit and with that they would not run any risk of depositing money and at the time of withdrawal they ask for kyc and when they do kyc they disapprove the documents and freeze funds, claiming that the person provided fake documents.
Totally laughable and useless on asking out KYC on 2k deposit overall or total and its true that why not really that asking on the time that people registers? With those numbers then it would really be just considered out to be that still on that way since its really that very minimal and just as mentioned that it is really that a threshold that anyone could easily achieve which means that they can easily be asked out some KYC even if they have played out minimal games or certain deposits which it is really that something that we dont really like. So i do agree into those words that better ask it out on the beginning rather than on setting numbers which it is really just as good as none or having nothing at all because it is really pointless or having no use at all.
Somewhat, you cant really blame out if people would really be turning out to be that skeptical on dealing with the site because KYC in the beginning is really that highly frowned upon on which it would really be just that
bringing out that kind of common reaction that people would really be avoiding it out instead on playing this one. There's so much platforms that do offer huge deposit threshold before they would be asking out
some KYC and not this one. I do see that this is a problem with this casino.
Both questions hit on the same topic. Our obligations towards our license. The short answer is that we need to apply the AML rules of Curacao.
You guys are asking for proof - check the law in Curacao.
We paid a pretty penny for consultancy and legal companies to help us craft our policy co they impact our players the minim amount possible.
To make our point more solid - I noticed that you guys promote Stake and Rollbit - I am more than sure that they have the same or ever more strict Terms. Since they run under the same license as us. And if they dont, they are risking their license to get revoked.
BTC