Indeed, unless it's against their religion to gamble.
Gambling is a big industry, it opens opportunity to improve the economy through taxes, but it's not a perfect business especially to those who are losing money against the casino, but we need to educate people that gambling sites have an edge and we will likely to lose, so treating it an entertainment is the best way to do.
Why liquor are not ban? because it's helping the economy and they just say drink moderately, the same thing could also be applied in gambling.
Is there any way that gambling activity could be moderated? It seems like a good idea to moderate gambling as we all know that many are addicted to gamble and somehow destroys the life of a gambler. Gambling is a big industry, it opens opportunity to improve the economy through taxes, but it's not a perfect business especially to those who are losing money against the casino, but we need to educate people that gambling sites have an edge and we will likely to lose, so treating it an entertainment is the best way to do.
Why liquor are not ban? because it's helping the economy and they just say drink moderately, the same thing could also be applied in gambling.
Just like smoking here in our place. It has been somehow moderated by increasing its tax for the smokers. The impact of high tax is that the price of the ciggarete become expensive and some smokers minimize their buying capacity. The label itself discourage every smoker knowingly the effect of its health.
If gambling could be moderated hoe could it be done? Could it be possible to create a law like this?
We can only control by ourselves, that's the way to have a moderation when it comes to gambling. The government will only act when there's a serious negative effect on gambling as they need to balance the risk and reward. Yes, they are still rewarded as they will get an income tax from gambling operation but if that would risk a lot of people to get addicted, I think it's not wise anymore to not act on it to address the problem.
Thus far, the only law I read in one of the threads in the forum IIRC is to limit gamblers at $100 per month.
When it comes to benefits then its no doubt since gambling business is one of the biggest contributor so most likely government would really consider it out on making it legal and i agree that
moderation doesnt only limit out to themselves but rather on the players or citizens itself.We are the ones who do make out spending and controlling our money into gambling activity is just
our responsibility not by other people.If you do let yourself fall into the pit of addiction or messed out yourself because of it then you just got overboard.
