Thanks, is the post below that states "Elliott Waves can be drawn as such that the price will never ever go higher" wrong too? I never heard any of the chart guys say that before.
It's a valid count, nothing more nothing less. That means it can happen that way, it also means that in hindsight it could turn out differently, and that after wave C where price is around 1.62 times of wave 1 (32*1.62=$51.82) it can lead to another, larger cycle which means another ATH beyond $1200. Mind you can happen, not must happen, it's also in the realm of possibility that this was it and Bitcoin is a FAD, in which case many analysts will say they have predicted it all along. (Which they will probably do in either case)
There can also be another valid count in which 266 was actually a sub-wave and 1200 was wave 3, but it doesn't invalidate my count, as of now. The thing is bulltards
always say we're at wave 3 since it means we will be going
up, uP, UP for the longest time. The tardiest of all bulltards even think wave 3 still hasn't ended.