Nothing special, you're talking nonsense IMO.
Nothing special, did you read the OP? I would really like you to point me to another coin that has working tech like XC and also the future plans of XC.
Topic: Let's learn about XC, And why it's the Future of Crypto "currencies" - page 7. (Read 5369 times)
August 11, 2014, 07:18:07 AM
Nothing special, did you read the OP? I would really like you to point me to another coin that has working tech like XC and also the future plans of XC.
August 11, 2014, 07:13:57 AM
Nothing special, you're talking nonsense IMO.
very special, your talking nonsense IMO.
August 11, 2014, 07:11:59 AM
Nothing special, you're talking nonsense IMO.
very special, your talking nonsense IMO. 
August 11, 2014, 07:09:58 AM
please stop the constant spamming of XC
Sell that shit and write it off as a loss instead of trying to get another pump going.. it's not going to happen
Sell that shit and write it off as a loss instead of trying to get another pump going.. it's not going to happen
Why? Why we should sell? Give us some reasons.
You know something that we don't?
No
You know it as well but you don't want to believe it.
I don't know what are you talking about!?
Plecase do explain...
August 11, 2014, 07:08:37 AM
Nothing special, you're talking nonsense IMO.
August 11, 2014, 07:01:36 AM
please stop the constant spamming of XC
Sell that shit and write it off as a loss instead of trying to get another pump going.. it's not going to happen
Sell that shit and write it off as a loss instead of trying to get another pump going.. it's not going to happen
Why? Why we should sell? Give us some reasons.
You know something that we don't?
No
You know it as well but you don't want to believe it.
August 11, 2014, 06:58:38 AM
please stop the constant spamming of XC
Sell that shit and write it off as a loss instead of trying to get another pump going.. it's not going to happen
Sell that shit and write it off as a loss instead of trying to get another pump going.. it's not going to happen
Why? Why we should sell? Give us some reasons.
You know something that we don't?
No
You know it as well but you don't want to believe it.
August 11, 2014, 06:56:55 AM
Must be hard to have missed the train and now just feed in uncertainty and shitcoins. XC has been, is and will be constantly delivering till we bypass the haters in the community altogether and get noticed in the open world.
August 11, 2014, 06:54:53 AM
please stop the constant spamming of XC
Sell that shit and write it off as a loss instead of trying to get another pump going.. it's not going to happen
no loss i put less then 5k into it when it first came out, and got 80k i hold 75k right now, all profit no need to pump and dump, has a bright future and i'm in profit since it's sitting around $1 mark, and not spamming i'm spreading awareness because half this forum seams to living under a rock. Sell that shit and write it off as a loss instead of trying to get another pump going.. it's not going to happen
August 11, 2014, 06:51:55 AM
please stop the constant spamming of XC
Sell that shit and write it off as a loss instead of trying to get another pump going.. it's not going to happen
Sell that shit and write it off as a loss instead of trying to get another pump going.. it's not going to happen
Why? Why we should sell? Give us some reasons.
You know something that we don't?
August 11, 2014, 06:48:09 AM
please stop the constant spamming of XC
Sell that shit and write it off as a loss instead of trying to get another pump going.. it's not going to happen
Sell that shit and write it off as a loss instead of trying to get another pump going.. it's not going to happen
August 11, 2014, 06:44:15 AM
Lol, I see no evidence of why it's the future. Just looks like another dime a dozen alt to me.
LOL, I see no evidence that you have a brain.
How can anyone that reads up on XC and who the main developer is come to the conclusion that XC is just another dime a dozen alt?
August 11, 2014, 06:07:38 AM
just name something better, should be easy since it's a dime a dozen..ohh that's what i thought it's not a dime a dozen, it's in a league of it's own, you all BTC fan boys, and your terrified, don't blame you really.
August 11, 2014, 05:38:32 AM
Lol, I see no evidence of why it's the future. Just looks like another dime a dozen alt to me.
thats because it is, plus its POS...
August 11, 2014, 05:34:47 AM
Lol, I see no evidence of why it's the future. Just looks like another dime a dozen alt to me.
thats because it is, plus its POS...
August 11, 2014, 05:22:49 AM
Lol, I see no evidence of why it's the future. Just looks like another dime a dozen alt to me.
Does it lol..wow..fell free to name something better..and not just promises i want to see working tech..or fell free to link the sender and receiver addresses and claim the 2 BTC bounty that's been out for over a month. August 11, 2014, 05:19:48 AM
Lol, I see no evidence of why it's the future. Just looks like another dime a dozen alt to me.
August 11, 2014, 05:16:04 AM
no one..
August 10, 2014, 08:54:53 PM
XC introduction video.
http://youtu.be/00WyuTm5jvQ
http://youtu.be/00WyuTm5jvQ
August 10, 2014, 05:58:36 PM
Some more info provided by one of XCs team members
Let's sketch a scenario here:
- I want to pay someone
- I don't want to publicly reveal my address
- I don't want to publicly reveal the amount paid
- I will need to prove to the recipient that the amount has been paid
- If the product/service I'm paying for is not delivered I want the option of using this proof of payment to demand a refund or otherwise seek redress.
- The recipient does not want to disclose his/her address
- The recipient does not want to disclose the amount received
- The recipient needs proof of payment before providing the product/service
Solution:
- Sender uses multipath to conceal the amount paid
- Sender uses trustless mixing to conceal the address paid from
- Sender sends to a single-use address that (s)he is in control of
- Recipient provides a publicised address but will receive payment on a stealth address, thus concealing the address received on
- Sender then makes a public payment to the recipient's publicised address that is recorded on the blockchain as successfully sent
- In the event of a dispute, the sender can sign a message proving to be the owner of the public key associated with that address. This involves disclosing - at least to the recipient and possibly also publicly or to a mediator - the address and the amount. As such, users will be discouraged from engaging in illicit transactions due to inability to dispute publicly should products or services not be delivered.
So that'll work pretty well - and I haven't even need to use XChat, which would come in handy for other scenarios.
Secondly, when XC starts on smart contracts there'll be an additional tool at our disposal: escrow service nodes (which earn fees for forwarding/arbitrating multisig transactions). Now that'll be powerful. There'll be no conceivable situation we can't engineer optimally.
LINKS TO XC RELATED
*https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.0
*http://xctalk.com/
*http://www.reddit.com/r/XCofficialreddit/
*http://xc-official.com/
Let's sketch a scenario here:
- I want to pay someone
- I don't want to publicly reveal my address
- I don't want to publicly reveal the amount paid
- I will need to prove to the recipient that the amount has been paid
- If the product/service I'm paying for is not delivered I want the option of using this proof of payment to demand a refund or otherwise seek redress.
- The recipient does not want to disclose his/her address
- The recipient does not want to disclose the amount received
- The recipient needs proof of payment before providing the product/service
Solution:
- Sender uses multipath to conceal the amount paid
- Sender uses trustless mixing to conceal the address paid from
- Sender sends to a single-use address that (s)he is in control of
- Recipient provides a publicised address but will receive payment on a stealth address, thus concealing the address received on
- Sender then makes a public payment to the recipient's publicised address that is recorded on the blockchain as successfully sent
- In the event of a dispute, the sender can sign a message proving to be the owner of the public key associated with that address. This involves disclosing - at least to the recipient and possibly also publicly or to a mediator - the address and the amount. As such, users will be discouraged from engaging in illicit transactions due to inability to dispute publicly should products or services not be delivered.
So that'll work pretty well - and I haven't even need to use XChat, which would come in handy for other scenarios.
Secondly, when XC starts on smart contracts there'll be an additional tool at our disposal: escrow service nodes (which earn fees for forwarding/arbitrating multisig transactions). Now that'll be powerful. There'll be no conceivable situation we can't engineer optimally.
LINKS TO XC RELATED
*https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.0
*http://xctalk.com/
*http://www.reddit.com/r/XCofficialreddit/
*http://xc-official.com/
Jump to: