Lets settle this, AMD or intel | Bitcointalksearch.org

300

member

Activity: 77

Merit: 10

Quote from: jsmit332 on July 08, 2014, 12:22:24 PM

This question has been asked for ages. It seems AMD have more cores and clock speed but intel has more effieient cores and hyper threading (not sure though). So what do you prefer or have. Who wins, you decide.

Interestingly, things were the exact opposite back in the early 2000's. Intel had high clock speeds but an inefficient architecture. AMD had lower clock speeds but were more efficient. Gamers back then tended to prefer AMD too.

azguard

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1001

Crypto-News.net: News from Crypto World

AMD and INTEL are good. Choice is on user to pick one.

I use home AMD kids are on PC most of the time playing games listening music ect.

In office i have INTEL and for work sure is better for what I do off course.

Yet it is on user to determine what is best for him/her in any means necessary and for what is will be used mining, gaming, working ....

DrG

legendary

Activity: 2086

Merit: 1035

Quote from: Malin Keshar on July 08, 2014, 11:22:25 PM

AMD because they have far better cost vs benefit

cost vs benefit? The only benefit I can see form a CPU is computer power, and Intel is currently leading in raw crunching performance per $ and performance per watt.

I still have some old Athlons and can still see the place where I did the pencil trick. Ahh the good old days. Much better than when my Cryix rig and my AMD k5 blew up.

Malin Keshar

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

AMD because they have far better cost vs benefit

ALToids

hero member

Activity: 519

Merit: 500

Quote from: Snorek on July 08, 2014, 05:49:00 PM

Quote from: ALToids on July 08, 2014, 04:51:10 PM

Cyrix FTW! Whoops, had a flashback to 1996 lol. Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue.

I had AMD machines back in the Athlon XP and Duron days, even an Opteron 144. Been Intel more or less before and after.

Lol Cyrix, thanks for the memories Cheesy

It was so long time ago...I feel old Sad

Check this out:
http://www.cpushack.com/CyrixShirtsandstuff.html

I remember getting a 486-DX2 66 in 1993 because I couldn't afford the extra $500 for the entry Pentium for college. They used to have those Microsource catalogs around the country and I found some good deals through those.

Intel today has the energy efficiency in their corner, but AMD was better on a per watt basis for a short period of time.

BitcoinAddicts

hero member

Activity: 502

Merit: 500

Intel because its more energy efficient if I understand right.

BawsyBoss

sr. member

Activity: 389

Merit: 250

I use Intel for the higher performance and stability, but many of you will probably disagree with me.

jrs99

newbie

Activity: 20

Merit: 0

I prefer Intel as they offer high end performance

btcton

legendary

Activity: 1288

Merit: 1007

Intel all the way. For non-gaming purposes I would probably consider AMD as well.

squall1066

copper member

Activity: 2310

Merit: 1032

Quote from: jsmit332 on July 08, 2014, 06:07:30 PM

Good points. Also there is nothing official to settle this was just for fun

I know, Just wanted to get one of these in. Shocked

jsmit332

hero member

Activity: 792

Merit: 1001

Video editing • Animated GIFs • Graphic Design

Quote from: squall1066 on July 08, 2014, 06:05:26 PM

To solve this you have to go a little back in time, Intel had more math co-processors, Making it the daddy of calculations (MIPS-MOPS) thus winning any office database compiling, meaning businesses preferred Intel, Now AMD was classed faster at bus I/O making it more responsive to the voodoo 3000 GPU making it a winner with gamers.

Showing my age a little here, THERE IS NOTHING TO SETTLE NOW. The difference between any same generation chip is minuscule, It is much more relying on other components for the full experience of the machine than the chip alone.

In short, I have spend far too much money on the latest best chip, Only to spend too much time on minesweeper/retro games (EMU's) and flash games.

Nuff said Roll Eyes

Good points. Also there is nothing official to settle this was just for fun

squall1066

copper member

Activity: 2310

Merit: 1032

To solve this you have to go a little back in time, Intel had more math co-processors, Making it the daddy of calculations (MIPS-MOPS) thus winning any office database compiling, meaning businesses preferred Intel, Now AMD was classed faster at bus I/O making it more responsive to the voodoo 3000 GPU making it a winner with gamers.

Showing my age a little here, THERE IS NOTHING TO SETTLE NOW. The difference between any same generation chip is minuscule, It is much more relying on other components for the full experience of the machine than the chip alone.

In short, I have spend far too much money on the latest best chip, Only to spend too much time on minesweeper/retro games (EMU's) and flash games.

Nuff said Roll Eyes

jsmit332

hero member

Activity: 792

Merit: 1001

Video editing • Animated GIFs • Graphic Design

I think an nvidia vs Radeon is in order.

Snorek

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1001

Quote from: ALToids on July 08, 2014, 04:51:10 PM

Cyrix FTW! Whoops, had a flashback to 1996 lol. Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue.

I had AMD machines back in the Athlon XP and Duron days, even an Opteron 144. Been Intel more or less before and after.

Lol Cyrix, thanks for the memories Cheesy

It was so long time ago...I feel old Sad

Brewins

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1000

From my experiences, I prefer AMD. I have a computer build in 2009 with AMD and it still can run modern games launched this year, and I don't have off board graph card. Also one AMD laptop lasted more than two years with 8+ daily hour of usage and lots of falls and impacts.

But I never experienced really high performance gamming(that is: running the last crysis, launched one month ago, using the maximum graphics). Intel has fame of having the best graphic cards for games, and being the best for parallel computing. Also its said that Intel CPU are less power-comsuming.

In the other hand, AMDs usually are cheaper, and are far best for GPU mining and stuff.

ALToids

hero member

Activity: 519

Merit: 500

Quote from: dropt on July 08, 2014, 05:05:24 PM

Quote from: ALToids on July 08, 2014, 04:51:10 PM

Cyrix FTW! Whoops, had a flashback to 1996 lol. Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue.

I had AMD machines back in the Athlon XP and Duron days, even an Opteron 144. Been Intel more or less before and after.

Holy hell were Cyrix chips ever garbage.

Yeah I know. I bought one Cyrix chip and board and it couldn't even install Win 95 without blue screening several times. I swapped the board twice and the CPU once and continued to have problems. Went to an AMD setup and had the machine running in 2 hours.

Sometimes competition for the sake of competition is not so good Cheesy

dropt

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ALToids on July 08, 2014, 04:51:10 PM

Cyrix FTW! Whoops, had a flashback to 1996 lol. Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue.

I had AMD machines back in the Athlon XP and Duron days, even an Opteron 144. Been Intel more or less before and after.

Holy hell were Cyrix chips ever garbage.

ALToids

hero member

Activity: 519

Merit: 500

Cyrix FTW! Whoops, had a flashback to 1996 lol. Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue.

I had AMD machines back in the Athlon XP and Duron days, even an Opteron 144. Been Intel more or less before and after.

jsmit332

hero member

Activity: 792

Merit: 1001

Video editing • Animated GIFs • Graphic Design

In honesty i think you get what you pay for if you want very good performance on a realistic budget AMD is the best but if you want all out performance intel is the best.

Dr. Pepper

full member

Activity: 172

Merit: 100

Is there really that much difference between them? I bet most couldn't notice the difference between comparable chips.

Topic: Lets settle this, AMD or intel (Read 1409 times)