It’d be good if you could define the word untrustworthy, The-One-Above-All.
I’ve been here since September 2014. In that time I have befome DT1 & a Merit Source. I’ve escrowed money here for people gambling against each other in the gambling section.
If I was untrustworthy would I have successfully held escrow? Somebody untrustworthy would use their DT position to scam.
Just so you know I’d be willing to bet that I hold more bitcoin’s than at least 90% of the people who post here.
I’m about as trustworthy as it gets.
Your problem is you don’t like the DT set up because lots of us gave you negative trust.
I'm glad you asked. Let me use this opportunity to answer your valid question and tear you a new asshole at the same time. Take time to reply and then ANSWER the ACTUAL points made.
What is NOT trustworthy.
1. Lauda lying for clear financial gain. That is scamming.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.506280032. Using red trust to silence the presentation of observable instances of wrong doing by DT's. This is scammers and their ass lickers like you using red trust (WHICH IS MEANT TO BE FOR SCAMMERS ONLY) to protect scammers and facilitate scamming. It is not a difficult concept to grasp. So if anyone presents an observable instance of wrong doing by a DT they roll out the red trust on them. This is scam facilitating and untrustworthy.
3. Thanks for admitting you gave lots of red trust and can not demonstrate ANY SCAMMING on our part at all. This was mostly given due to us starting an INVESTIGATIVE thread on hhampuz's hiring of scammers, liars, probable extortionists, shady escrows THE VERY SAME PEOPLE YOU TAKE YOUR ORDERS FROM AND ARE SHIT SCARED OF.
4. We love the red trust you all gave to this account because it demonstrates clearly that even when you bring observable instances of wrong doing about certain DT members they will
a/ say it is defamation and lies but can not deny the evidence? what a bunch of retarded losers.
b/ say you are threatening them if you say to others they should investigate for themselves certain DT past's here
c/ vod there giving red trust for us deleting his 3rd SAME accusation about OG and still refusing to present evidence of his claims....LOL that is defamation but no we are trustworthy for stopping him repeating accusations with no evidence. But we present clear evidence of these issues we bring up and that is defamation Lol. What a bunch of untrustworthy scum.
5. The observable double standards and gaming of the trust system
account sellers that claim don't mind if they facilitate scamming or will do it anyway for 0.3 btc like nutildah are made DTs whilst other accounts buyers and sellers are given red trust and excluded.
screaming posting PM's is untrustworthy and disgusting then such moon is found to have posted peoples PM's
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14161146MANY scammers and indeed the very best scammers will of course need to look trustworthy for a period of time. Quoting you're on DT because the same people that the PM demonstrates forces you to do what they say just makes it look more of a colluding untrustworthy scheme. Stop digging your own hole. I wonder if we look who you give and get the most merit from matches from the colluding gang on DT1 ??
You've been busted as another bitch of Laudas however you want to try and spin it and a trust abuser trying to use red marks to invalidate observable instances that anyone can investigate for themselves. DT is broken and people like you broke it scumbag.
2014 who cares noob... you were late to the party. That cuts no ice with us. About the time your master lauda was lying and scamming people actually as clearly demonstrated .