Bill Gates is indeed the most interesting example of today's businessmen. I agree with all of the above, but there is one more thing.
I don't remember which article of his I read, it was quite a while ago, but there was a good emphasis on the next thought. And he is not the first, but he applied it very qualitatively in modern business. The essence of this thought is extremely simple - correctly assess the situation, identify real problems, draw the right conclusions. Sounds simple, even primitive. To clarify this slogan, I will cite one historical fact so that you understand its value. I do not answer for the accuracy of the nuances, I retell from memory, please take into account
The Second World War. Britain is fighting in the air of Europe with the German Luftwaffe. Of course, a problem arises - the survivability of combat aircraft. The designers are focusing on determining the damage to aircraft, very carefully studying the damaged aircraft that have flown to the airfields, in which the hull, engine, and control systems are damaged. The goal is to determine the thinnest places in order to correct and increase the survival rate of both equipment and crews. A lot of work is being done, constructive changes are being made to the design of aircraft. But what is surprising - it does not give a noticeable result ...
And only one young designer asks to give him the floor, promising to explain what the venerable designers are wrong about. Absolutely expected, he is "sent away", young, inexperienced, what can he say useful?! But some time passes and the designers understand that their great efforts do not give a noticeable change in the situation. And then they remember the young engineer and invite him to speak. He comes and says simple words, but which turned the minds of all venerable and experienced designers and engineers. He said the following:
- You have chosen the wrong point for defining problems. You are examining the planes that FLYED to the airfield, and we need to investigate those planes that DID NOT FLY and crashed, because. they were fatally injured! The planes that have flown in do not have such, there are damages that created big problems, but did not "kill the apparatus and pilots." After that, British engineers began to collect downed aircraft, and began to study OTHER damage that actually led to the destruction of aircraft. After that, completely different changes were made to the design of the aircraft, and the survivability of British aircraft instantly increased!
This is what I mean - we very often look for a problem not where it really exists, and based on incorrect conclusions, we make incorrect decisions.
Sorry if it's long, but very revealing.ling.