Pages:

Author

Topic: List of all Bitcoin addresses with a balance - page 9. (Read 9201 times)

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: LoyceV on May 20, 2021, 06:37:20 AM

From the past few days, I've identified 101 different IP addresses that downloaded the same file in the same way 169 times. The IPs I checked are owned by Microsoft. Maybe a proxy server or VPN? Either way, I'll DROP their connections now. I expect to add more IPs to the list later. I don't like the way someone burns through 50 GB bandwidth per day.

Well, it got worse:
Image loading...

What's wrong with people? Tongue

The same 1 GB file got downloaded approximately 200 times in an hour, this time using Google servers. And since incoming bandwidth is free, they can just burn through my bandwidth with virtually no cost. But why? Just spam my feedback like normal people if you don't like me Tongue

I've increased the IP-bans, I now DROP entire IP ranges.

This still applies:

Quote from: LoyceV on May 20, 2021, 06:37:20 AM

Although unlikely: If I added your IP by mistake: please PM me.
If you don't want me to know which forum account belongs to which IP: setup a throw away email to contact me:

Quote from: LoyceV on March 05, 2021, 04:50:14 AM

Code:

[email protected]

bitmover

legendary

Activity: 2352

Merit: 6089

bitcoindata.science

I have been monitoring the total number of funded addresses here , with the data provided by LoyceV here

Segwit adoption keeps growing, look at this chart:

https://bitcoindata.science/bitcoin-funded-addresses.html

Since Sep 2020, the total number of Bech32 addresses had more than 100% increase!
There were 1,552,770 total funded addresses (5%), and now we have 4,046,320 (10,8%).

The number of P2SH addresses had a small increase as well, from 19,4% to 22%.

And the total number of Legacy addresses is basically the same, 23 to 25 millions addresses.

We can conclude that most of the new created addresses are Bech32 and P2Sh addresses, while the total number of Legacy grows at a much slower rate

Just added this text to the website:

Quote

Since September 2020, the total number of addresses has changed from 31,115,394 to 37,551,189 (20.68%)

Legacy addresses change: 7.43%
P2SH addresses change: 36.25%
Bech32 addresses change: 161.17%

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: Sogolev on May 24, 2021, 09:01:20 AM

I ask experienced users to tell me what tools I can use to collect a file containing all the bitcoin addresses that have ever had a positive balance.

Maybe there is ready-made software that can do this.

See my other topic: List of all Bitcoin addresses ever used.
However: I've been struggling to find an affordable host that can handle the data processing, so I haven't updated it in months. And since a few days, my temporary server is offline (and hasn't responded yet).
I don't really want to spin up a paid-by-the-hour VPS just for this.

Sogolev

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 1

Greetings to the audience!

I ask experienced users to tell me what tools I can use to collect a file containing all the bitcoin addresses that have ever had a positive balance.

Maybe there is ready-made software that can do this.

Thank you in advance

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

This is new:
Image loading...

Since a few days, it looks like someone is downloading the latest version multiple times per hour, while I only update it once a day. I don't like having to look at logfiles, but it seems to be coming from different IP-addresses.
If someone made a mistake in a cronjob: please set it to download once a day! If this doesn't stop I'll have to ban some IPs Sad

Update: From the past few days, I've identified 101 different IP addresses that downloaded the same file in the same way 169 times. The IPs I checked are owned by Microsoft. Maybe a proxy server or VPN? Either way, I'll DROP their connections now. I expect to add more IPs to the list later. I don't like the way someone burns through 50 GB bandwidth per day.

Although unlikely: If I added your IP by mistake: please PM me.
If you don't want me to know which forum account belongs to which IP: setup a throw away email to contact me:

Quote from: LoyceV on March 05, 2021, 04:50:14 AM

Code:

[email protected]

As expected: 2 new downloads with 2 new IP addresses. I'll now try to DROP their connection within a few seconds, so their download won't complete. I'm still curious who's doing this, and why. It's especially annoying that it's a new IP-address all the time, now I risk banning real users. But at the rate this is going, my 2 TB bandwidth won't make it to the end of the month.

I'd love to have a more professional way to handle this

willi9974

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 3003

Enjoy 500% bonus + 70 FS

maybe another idea than bruteforce.
Generating billions of new BTC addresses and checking for one generated would be included in the list --> illegal gambling

supika

newbie

Activity: 43

Merit: 0

Quote from: LoyceV on April 28, 2021, 02:11:51 AM

Out of curiosity: why do you need dormant addressess? If you're trying to brute-force private keys, does it really matter if they're long-term hodlers (or forgotten)?

Thanks for your answer. It was a curiosity of how many addresses are untouched for more than 10 years.
From my point of view brute forcing of sha256 encrypted private keys is a waste of time.

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: supika on April 28, 2021, 01:49:16 AM

It's possible to add a column with the date of last spending tx?
Would be nice to identify the dormant addresses.

Someone asked a similar question by PM a couple weeks ago. This was my response:

Quote from: LoyceV on January 07, 2021, 11:33:04 AM

The data
See blockdata.loyce.club
blockdata.loyce.club/inputs/ (386 GB)
blockdata.loyce.club/outputs/ (121 GB)
blockdata.loyce.club/transactions/ (44 GB)

But it's a bit more work than I currently want to do for this, especially because "inputs" doesn't show input addresses, so it takes some additional steps.
If you do get the data out of this, please post it on Bitcointalk

I could offer this as a (paid) service if you really want it, in that case make me an offer.

Out of curiosity: why do you need dormant addressess? If you're trying to brute-force private keys, does it really matter if they're long-term hodlers (or forgotten)?

supika

newbie

Activity: 43

Merit: 0

Hi,

It's possible to add a column with the date of last spending tx?
Would be nice to identify the dormant addresses.
Thanks!

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: Sanka555 on April 23, 2021, 03:14:48 AM

I thought you create a base by decrypting files from Core wallet)

Nope. See:

Quote from: LoyceV on June 11, 2020, 10:30:34 AM

Credits
Blockchair Database Dumps has a staggering amount of data, easily accessible (at 10 kB/s) with daily updates. All data presented in this topic comes from Blockchair.

Sanka555

member

Activity: 96

Merit: 36

Quote from: LoyceV on April 23, 2021, 03:09:57 AM

Quote from: Sanka555 on April 23, 2021, 02:08:41 AM

Maybe you just need to publish the script ***.bat for windows for example, or on JAVA code (the best variant). which will simply take the Bitcoin Core wallet and make of it

This data comes from Blockchair.com, I'm not sure what you're asking.

I thought you create a base by decrypting files from Core wallet)

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: Sanka555 on April 23, 2021, 02:08:41 AM

Maybe you just need to publish the script ***.bat for windows for example, or on JAVA code (the best variant). which will simply take the Bitcoin Core wallet and make of it

This data comes from Blockchair.com, I'm not sure what you're asking.

Sanka555

member

Activity: 96

Merit: 36

Quote from: LoyceV on April 04, 2021, 04:13:38 AM

You guys have burned through roughly 1400 GB last month. Just a FYI: 2000 GB per month is the limit for my current hosting.

Maybe you just need to publish the script ***.bat for windows for example, or on JAVA code (the best variant). which will simply take the Bitcoin Core wallet and make of it

blockchair_bitcoin_addresses_and_balance_*****.txt

I would be very grateful to you for that

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

You guys have burned through roughly 1400 GB last month. Just a FYI: 2000 GB per month is the limit for my current hosting.

BrewMaster

legendary

Activity: 2128

Merit: 1293

There is trouble abrewing

Quote from: bitmover on January 06, 2021, 04:28:16 PM

Nodes shouldn't validate transactions to invalid addresses..

nodes don't relay non-standard transactions already but they must never not-validate any non-standard transaction (when they are confirmed) because that would break the backward compatibility of bitcoin and we no longer would be able to have soft forks.
SegWit addresses are non-standard by old client standards and yet they are valid.

however, this is a double edge sword. we can't prevent people from experimenting. that means they can pay to witness addresses with a version higher than what it is defined. it has been happening from early days too. for example the block 170060 contains P2SH transaction while P2SH soft fork had never happened by then. now every full node treats this particular block as an "exception".

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: willi9974 on March 04, 2021, 07:51:43 AM

what is the list

Read.

Quote from: LoyceV on June 11, 2020, 10:30:34 AM

Data retention and updates
I'll provide daily updates. I keep the latest 3 daily snapshots, and the latest 5 monthly snapshots. One a day (or once a month) I delete the oldest files.

The server ran out of disk space during the last download. Now it should be good for a while again.

willi9974

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 3003

Enjoy 500% bonus + 70 FS

i know (read) the list is from blockchair, but

what is the list
what is the point of the list
why blockchair created this list

Best regards,
Willi

DougM

full member

Activity: 173

Merit: 120

Quote from: LoyceV on February 15, 2021, 10:37:31 AM

Quote from: DougM on February 15, 2021, 10:22:17 AM

so your theory is these are small amount accounts are a result of dust attacks? Could some be 'left over change' during a transaction that is lost/forgotten about?

Dust attacks typically use the minimum amount (546 sat), so that's quite likely. From this data, I can't count the addresses that hold a dust input and also a larger amount.
..
I only checked the last one, and it's an Omli Layer transaction. Great, this crap spams the blockchain too Sad

As for dust attacks: I'm now kinda curious how much was paid in fees (and how much data got added to the blockchain) because of people who included the dust in their transactions. It's a lot of data so I can't quickly get a number for this.

If wallets could start ignoring dust inputs by default, that would be great!

completely agree!

Quote

2,821,479 addresses hold 1000 sat or less. Total value: 1,403,085,278 satoshi (~14 BTC).

So do you think the dust attackers got their money worth? based on your calculations for < 1000 addresses amounts to 14 BTC or ~679K at present value for just the dust. What exactly is their motive to justify this large outlay? I suspect this represents a number of different 'dust attackers' over time so maybe hard to generalize, but I am curious what people think.

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: DougM on February 15, 2021, 10:22:17 AM

so your theory is these are small amount accounts are a result of dust attacks? Could some be 'left over change' during a transaction that is lost/forgotten about?

Dust attacks typically use the minimum amount (546 sat), so that's quite likely. From this data, I can't count the addresses that hold a dust input and also a larger amount.

Feel free to check a few:

Code:

1EM72MRxX5teiLDZDkp6vpB7Fs4gVcsBWF 546
197uWhobsZ4boSR8LjZTCpKkHuCQL15y4N 546
1DcjMsvCj1AATH6kQubsikK3pUeyFhSngp 546
1P2o8eACQFFDHHq4zZHSwPaTr347raGNNM 546
1ECYdDEmzRKm53i7H4PhCEar2SdtTemfgC 546
1J9xAa2fFabDZmPmapiczcRoeeSqtXLSC9 546
12wj7j4RSduvEt6TqoKTgH6W92Zdh1MUmL 546
1F1qvANdwZkSFosjxVY9VHD7phnZyhnXhH 546
1FN4QEPDT6K2QT6SNETmgPJdL4Qajx5x2K 546
1JzAdzFR89jT8rTCi8LzV6kj57NeXaBXd1 546
1Mik1tJvn6aunTgSbN2UzitzdZBoxeqV5E 546
3LGrNL6toFoeJb9DGYRKvvaheyVg9jCJq6 546
19gXeh5v5T2UTLJrPPWok424EuyTAtr3vK 546
3Pimkc1JiSiMVvMF4fATmWW1Z76TzVQQex 546
1EB6PXMKDE8fkN9DZPPuzH1qoN6nzuqjN6 546
1DVzTh1zA8azcjWvcHnwKvKc8ACYhSLRwd 546
3BSK1KX3WzdXcQDSoXL39g3X7HH1CKsUqy 546
17c6ii1kBTBDhEhB5DVjY5DLFe9pyYtf4y 546
1AKSbLMPjwErAsijTPUrNF87XfjMzEF7Jt 546
1C7tsDp4SGGsWzySycobW5SKZNDtGdzYd6 546
3BPMryLEyp6eCSgdbayrSroF1abU52H5Ti 546
3JbUHH3ZdfjMar6PDEFVxZVJcL4g3wxFZ1 546
1Km9HaKxEntE8NPaBp1ataTMVKeaMiZe4x 546
3Be4gfZBe2zfWNAR3zjqXpr2aCSwgJ9CkH 546
18kgQniviHyMxTEmhojASfvB39cuwayv19 546
1Nzzx5jFFv8NWoNSAMVxKK5EuVEnr91x2r 546
13CHpohNridm8L6VMSsZ4NqvVdbwqdsCwN 546
1N99f4eC6TbzF7iHCDzMhhaC2HW9qZGc1R 546
18ESDDtFFqFSbHfpe1VfNWg7A2Ym17QCFr 546
14aPgqsQAxrHktVDe4yHwHdmzNAb5pFiBB 546
39ZjTnjbFbXBHmPPm3SxHw8eBV34ggDzL7 546
19AhE5cFabYu1k7EZf1rCNMWz2nmZ4agx1 546
16owPsPAATsEz8mMC2SJEZkcnRC5n9Djb9 546

I only checked the last one, and it's an Omli Layer transaction. Great, this crap spams the blockchain too Sad

DougM

full member

Activity: 173

Merit: 120

Quote from: LoyceV on December 26, 2020, 06:37:46 AM

I've counted some dust addresses:
573,966 addresses hold 546 satoshi.
168,663 addresses hold 547 satoshi.
74,835 addresses hold 548 satoshi.
2212 addresses hold 549 satoshi.
12,745 addresses hold 550 satoshi.
1,301 addresses hold 500 satoshi.
310,361 addresses hold 1000 satoshi.
6,010 addresses hold 9 satoshi.
4,209 addresses hold 1001 satoshi.

2,821,479 addresses hold 1000 sat or less. Total value: 1,403,085,278 satoshi (~14 BTC).

fascinating...so your theory is these are small amount accounts are a result of dust attacks? Could some be 'left over change' during a transaction that is lost/forgotten about? Thanks for sharing!