Topic: List of Participant in the promotion of scam site. - page 3. (Read 1584 times)

Hello guys,

we don't want users to be tagged for wearing our signature, especially when we believe that this would be unfair in regard to them.

Thus, we have launched a review campaign to show that 1xBit pays, and the complaints received do not reflect the real situation.
This campaign already have quite a lot of positive reactions confirming that the payments were proceeded.

Also, since the beginning there were no straight proof of 1xBit scamming activities on this forum. Yet there were proofs of payouts - check out our signature post.

Sincerely,
1xBit team

Well i knew 1xbit since a while and since i'm a member at their platform, i didn't face any problem with them that's why i agreed to promote them. I don't have any sources to know whether they scammed people or not since as i stated before i never had any problem with them, after seeing and reading the issues on the posts i saw that they have some problems and then i saw this subject and opted out.
This happened in the past with Yobit too, everyone was promoting yobit then everyone said that yobit is a scam. After that when yobit arranged a campaign with a manager, everyone was joining and they never said that yobit is a scam, why won't you tag that manager ?
Also, there is a huge problem with the managers whom are earning alot of funds from the other projects they agree with and they are selecting only the biggest merit earners which is unfair for us.
That's why suchmoon tagged my account last time, go back and checky posts, they are quality posts and not shitposting. His/Her main issue is my participation in Yobit's campaign, i might have been doing burst posting but what i insist on is that bitcoin talk is no longer fair, at least for me. I am not selling this forum for pennies but i didn't have any clue that these projects are scam/pyramid bla bla... once i knew i opted out and unfortunately it was late each time. I am not going to say that i was right, i think i did wrong moves but i didn't have any clue.

You never do...some people just don't deserve second chance...or third.


I believe that is purpose of warning flag. Accounts shilling for scams no matter what? If you ask me, that is damn good reason to flag them.

Where is suchmoon? Usually she shows up and tells us how it is inappropriate to flag the accounts that didn't scam anybody and "technically" she is right. Suchmoon, honey somebody is not using the trust system as intended. Come here and say something please.

Finally, the spreadsheet is out, makes the work easier. Those who decided to advertise scam are some greedy chaps who should not be trusted, because they will choose scam for just a few bucks. The purpose of trust system is to identify scammers and those willing to promote scam here and should be tagged as members who should not be trusted, so I am tagging and flagging all accounts that are promoting the 1xbit scam.

Until 1xbit resolve all the issues and payback the people they scammed, I may not change my mind. This is my personal decision. You can't scam innocent people out there and bring the stolen money here to lure members into trying to paint a beautiful picture about your bloody scam site.


01. protech77 - Tagged
02. Tumanggor - Tagged
03. erdogan - Tagged
04. ebede - Tagged
05. alisha-k - Tagged
06. yayayo - Tagged
07. wildan88 - Tagged
08. gadado - Tagged
09. blackfor3st - Tagged
10. sempak - Tagged
11. neficopa - Tagged
12. jinxing - Tagged

If there are any new advertisers I missed, please alert me.

Hey guys especially the Pharmacist, i removed the signature i didn't have any clue on the status of 1xbit. Really sorry for such bad behaviour i am not commited to scams and didn't take a close look.

You're just imagining. DS wouldn't try to get merit from OgNasty in a merit giveaway thread.

I recognize many of the member names from this list because they participated in adkinscambet shitshow that was happening here for months, and they have been inactive for some time until now.

And as OP already pointed out, they're greedy--and obviously they don't care about their reputation on the forum.  I haven't checked the ranks of the members in question, but I'm assuming most of these accounts are alts or throwaways.  The only username I recognize is FaucetKING; the rest I don't think I've ever seen (they probably post mostly in Altcoin Discussion).

_BlackStar....DarkStar_

Any connection there, or am I imagining things?

Edit:  I just took a look at the applicants for that campaign, and there were an alarmingly high number of Hero and Legendary members willing to tarnish their accounts for the sake of $140/week max.  Those still could be throwaway accounts, but given their ranks they shouldn't be.  Those accounts are worth money with a clean trust history and will probably be useless for campaigns in the future with negative trust on them (and I'm not promoting account sales, BTW).  Crazy.

It was quite ridiculous when I visit 1xbit signature campaign participants. Because I found only one participant who does not have red tags, but he has neutral feedback from other DT members as a spammer. I don't know who accepted or not, I just follow who has worn 1xbit signature. So I left only one neutral feedback to users since that profile wasn't tagged. I don't think it's necessary to tag who already have a red tag for a various reason since I do not accept red-tagged user usually in my campaigns.

Whether they don't care about negative feedback or not. I am personally going to red tag and flag all the accounts wearing the signature and advertising 1xbit which has been long known to be a scam site. This kind of thing should not be accepted in the community.

It makes no sense tagging adkinsbet shills but then leaving out those advertising 1xbit which we all know is scam and have lots of unresolved issues. I have never seen a casino with that many scam accusations like 1xbit.

Who care about them? Take a look at the participant profile the manager accept because you will definitely know who they really are. The funny thing is, no one from participant has been accepted into a campaign voiced oppose the flag posted on a manager's profile and it is a sign that these people are only concerned with money regardless of the current situation.




Flag (or maybe not suitable) won't stop these participant either, so negative tag for them or neutral and then ignoring them is a solution that other manager like you might find useful.

Do you think they care about negative feedback that applies to the 1xbit campaign? I don't think so and most of the user who has applied there are red tagged. I don't think a flag against participants is appropriate. The best solution is to add neutral feedback for future reference, so other managers would notice them before accepting. Most probably I will take a look at applicants to leave neutral feedback because I have to mark them since I am a campaign manager. By the way, most participants are just spammer there. I am not sure how effective will this campaign at all.

An "archived" version would be better

Because they're just a bunch of spammers/shitposters.

I don't think creating a flag for each one of them would stop them either; I consider them as throwaway accounts but it might come in handy ^[flag] for warning the newbies/quests.

I quote everyone who wants to advertise scam site because they purposely signed up, using their signature, avatar and personal text on their profile. Most of them have received negative tag from member of DT and some have not. I don't understand why this person is willing to advertise scam on this forum simply out of greed. They ignored the warning and they also ignored the trust system so none of them would stop this stupid act.

The people on this list have the potential to increase the number of users who were tricked by the site because of the advertisement they distribute. Negative trust will not stop them and is activating the flag a viable option for all account involved?
Oh Lord, give me the strength to tag them more .......