If you want I've got a list here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.29034329
You can manually check them, and see if you want to add any of them to your list if you are going to be updating it regularly as I'm finding it difficult to keep regular updates due to the fact I'll only ever add users to that list with archive evidence which can be extremely tedious to do. Especially formatting it all. So feel free to use any of them on that list as I'm only going to be aiming to update every now, and then.
Here you go have a free legendary member to add to the list: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ilvbtc-357163
Topic: List of ShitPoster (Full Member++) [2 Legendary] [Updated- 10th June 2018] - page 2. (Read 1084 times)
May 25, 2018, 05:24:44 PM
May 25, 2018, 10:03:22 AM
You should maintain this list and make little improvements here and there. There would be a lot of utility in a community compiled list of high-ranking shitposters. At the very least we could attempt to reform the users that are not acting maliciously through gentle suggestion. The users that have gone unseen by DT members that are acting maliciously can get tagged, bagged and snagged. The first suggestion that pops into my head would be placing their usernames somewhere within your OP. Creating a table might be useful, but simply adding the usernames attached would be helpful. I want an easy way to read through the list, especially once it becomes filled with more users. I've placed this thread on my Watchlist, will definitely poke my head in here if I come across anyone to suggest and it'll be interesting to see how it develops.
I will update if I find any, of course. I always keep an eye on high ranked user in any thread.
On my phone now, it's little hard to form it as a good looking one. Will reform the list when I will be on my computer.
May 25, 2018, 08:46:46 AM
You should maintain this list and make little improvements here and there. There would be a lot of utility in a community compiled list of high-ranking shitposters. At the very least we could attempt to reform the users that are not acting maliciously through gentle suggestion. The users that have gone unseen by DT members that are acting maliciously can get tagged, bagged and snagged. The first suggestion that pops into my head would be placing their usernames somewhere within your OP. Creating a table might be useful, but simply adding the usernames attached would be helpful. I want an easy way to read through the list, especially once it becomes filled with more users. I've placed this thread on my Watchlist, will definitely poke my head in here if I come across anyone to suggest and it'll be interesting to see how it develops.
May 25, 2018, 08:40:44 AM
Here's a nomination for the list: Full Member hrz
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/hrz-1156301;sa=showPosts
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/hrz-1156301;sa=showPosts
right now it's time to buy bitcoin, bitcoin price again fall maybe one month ahead bitcoin price will skyrocket to moon. 
Like what I'm talking to it really stands out see? emoticon of laughing but there's nothing funny about the post if you read it comprehensively. I can barely understand what s/he means but I reckon it's generally about bitcoin and price volatity of it.
May 25, 2018, 03:05:05 AM
Here's a nomination for the list: Full Member hrz
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/hrz-1156301;sa=showPosts
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/hrz-1156301;sa=showPosts
May 25, 2018, 01:04:19 AM
I'm sure it has probably been mentioned on a Metal thread somewhere... But perhaps we need some rules (guidelines?) governing the running of campaigns... Especially ones that "pay to post".
Having said that, is there actually a way to make campaign managers more accountable for the output of their campaign participants? If there are viable solutions... should we make them (the managers) accountable? Or should we simply continue to name and shame the users who are shitposting?
Having said that, is there actually a way to make campaign managers more accountable for the output of their campaign participants? If there are viable solutions... should we make them (the managers) accountable? Or should we simply continue to name and shame the users who are shitposting?
There's really only two ways to prevent the current abuse. Either, we tackle the issue by imposing guidelines/rules that are enforced by the staff members or we take things into our own hands, and tag campaign managers.
I feel like the first suggestion would be the best, and the second suggestion wouldn't likely affect them as the people who hire them don't really care about the quality of the campaign, and only getting their name out there.
I'm not sure what theymos thinks about tackling the abuse via moderation, but I imagine he will treat it the same as spam. Although, I would argue that they are offering an incentive for bad quality posts, and therefore are the same as threads offering an incentive just on a much wider scale.
May 25, 2018, 12:54:17 AM
He's wearing eterbank signature. Gee, I wonder if their signature campaign rules have anything to do with his posting behaviour:
[quote]At least 10 post per week are required in bitcointalk forum, only constructive posts count (but we won’t be rigorous in our evaluation).
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-eterbankcom-square-for-crypto-retail-pos-presale-live-3249010
[quote]At least 10 post per week are required in bitcointalk forum, only constructive posts count (but we won’t be rigorous in our evaluation).
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-eterbankcom-square-for-crypto-retail-pos-presale-live-3249010
I can't imagine I just read that as a requirement for a campaign and to imagine that a manager would pay for such a participant is what is even more disgusting. Reading through is posts, just show some people are not willing to learn or change to add value. I don't see anything stopping him from just contributing but I guess its going to be a bought account. I have known about shit posters but Hero Member is way out of it and should be discouraged not only him but the manager of the campaign.
The problem I see here is not the minimum amount to post at all, I have seen someone made over 80 posts in a week and not one was spam. Short, concise, straight to the point and meaningful at that.
May 24, 2018, 10:29:04 PM
This is one of the very few reason why merit is not pleasing to the eyes of the newbies, and/or members that are about to rank up. Pretty sure if merit was implemented from the very start, one wouldn't really post like this. At least if you want a merit that is.
Is merit the only thing for which we are trying to post quality contents?
Of course, no. It's a matter of the standard of our community.
May 24, 2018, 09:55:08 PM
I'm sure it has probably been mentioned on a Meta thread somewhere... But perhaps we need some rules (guidelines?) governing the running of campaigns... Especially ones that "pay to post".
Having said that, is there actually a way to make campaign managers more accountable for the output of their campaign participants? If there are viable solutions... should we make them (the managers) accountable? Or should we simply continue to name and shame the users who are shitposting?
Having said that, is there actually a way to make campaign managers more accountable for the output of their campaign participants? If there are viable solutions... should we make them (the managers) accountable? Or should we simply continue to name and shame the users who are shitposting?
May 23, 2018, 05:42:53 AM
This is one of the very few reason why merit is not pleasing to the eyes of the newbies, and/or members that are about to rank up. Pretty sure if merit was implemented from the very start, one wouldn't really post like this. At least if you want a merit that is.
May 22, 2018, 08:32:59 AM
He's wearing eterbank signature. Gee, I wonder if their signature campaign rules have anything to do with his posting behaviour:
They will not be rigorous?Quote
At least 10 post per week are required in bitcointalk forum, only constructive posts count (but we won’t be rigorous in our evaluation).
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-eterbankcom-square-for-crypto-retail-pos-presale-live-3249010So, they are encouraging shit poster. This is ridiculous.
May 22, 2018, 07:02:34 AM
He's wearing eterbank signature. Gee, I wonder if their signature campaign rules have anything to do with his posting behaviour:
Quote
At least 10 post per week are required in bitcointalk forum, only constructive posts count (but we won’t be rigorous in our evaluation).
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-eterbankcom-square-for-crypto-retail-pos-presale-live-3249010 
May 22, 2018, 06:36:52 AM
These posts add absolutely nothing to the forum, even worse, they have to be stored in a database, consuming resources ..
When all shit posts adds up, I bet this gives crazy numbers.
I have left a feedback.
When all shit posts adds up, I bet this gives crazy numbers.
I have left a feedback.
May 22, 2018, 05:12:03 AM
Should be banned. Useless oneliner posts that are made within minutes of one another add nothing to the forum. And someone that posts only those kinds of replies is not someone that is good for the forum.
Its a shame for that user to have a high rank and yet, he is posting one liner shit posts. Maybe he can be negged or banned for shitposting. I saw some users who have negative trust here because of shitposting. They don't contribute to the forum 
May 22, 2018, 01:01:44 AM
Should be banned. Useless oneliner posts that are made within minutes of one another add nothing to the forum. And someone that posts only those kinds of replies is not someone that is good for the forum.
May 22, 2018, 01:00:03 AM
Have a look on this guy- https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/szafa-903739
All most every of his/her post is limited within a few characters and he/she doesn't know how to write english correctly.
I don't know whether there is any thread dedicated to Shit Poster
Would appreciate to have the link of that thread."
Planning to create a childthread for this list in which I will list only Full Member as you can see a lot of full members have been included in the list. What's your thoughts on it?
Last Added - 10th June 2018- Full Member - Dazedconfused11
Total Findings= 22
2 Legendary
3 Hero Member
2 Sr Member
15 Full Member
Spammers, Shitposters List by Welsh- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.29034329
Newbies can never get high rank with shitposting.
This thread is for those who got higher rank (Full Member or Above) before the merit system.
I strongly believe that this thread will help all the people who want a spam free forum. Bounty managers can also utilize this thread for preventing low quality applicants.
You can suggest below if you find any shitposter. I will merit (depend on availability
) your post if you can suggest a shitposter here.Current Spendable merit- 4
| Username---------- | Link of posts-------------- | Rank--------------- | Abusing Merit? |
| ilvbtc | Posts of ilvbtc | Legendary | No |
| killerjoegreece | Posts of killerjoegreece | Legendary | No |
| szafa | Posts of szafa | Hero Member | No |
| alamin99 | Posts of alamin99 | Hero Member | No |
| m4xp0w3r7 | Posts of m4xp0w3r7 | Hero Member | No |
| Chibongvdg | Posts of Chibongvdg | Sr Member | No |
| Koloulinger | Posts of Koloulinger | Sr Member | No |
| velosepur | Posts of velosepur | Full Member | No |
| hrz | Posts of hrz | Full Member | No |
| mohiulbd | Posts of mohiulbd | Full Member | Yes |
| blueberry7 | Posts of blueberry7 | Full Member | No |
| Good_Boy | Posts of Good_Boy | Full Member | No |
| Rosa Paula | Posts of Rosa Paula | Full Member | No |
| androidpobeditel | Posts of androidpobeditel | Full Member | No |
| mhrwyhhgd | Posts of mhrwyhhgd | Full Member | No |
| Ayamj | Posts of Ayamj | Full Member | No |
| cryptjh | Posts of cryptjh | Full Member | suspicious |
| gliridian | Posts of gliridian | Full Member | No |
| Hanif2020 | Posts of Hanif2020 | Full Member | No |
| Dazedconfused11 | Posts of Dazedconfused11 | Full Member | No |
| asma555 | Posts of asma555 | Full Member | No |
| Dazedconfused11 | Posts of Dazedconfused11 | Full Member | No |
Jump to: