Okay, I thought that there's only one basis for those ratings and it's the website itself. I guess this is a good idea that you're allowing users to rate those bounties but if there will be desperate bounty supporters, they could abuse it and give ratings in favor of them.
Well, this is the loop hole that I see but I know that there's a way for you to moderate it if things like that comes.
Yes, I think the method is not to be abused as much as possible. The scoring is only a reference. The main purpose is to facilitate the retrieval of more good projects.
That's great, I guess you're already prepared and also see that it's possible to come.
Just my suggestion that it would be better if you do list out projects according to your own criteria and research.
This would be more worth to look on for those people who are serious on finding good project and you might have
higher chances on getting out some good donation from successful hunters.What you think? lol
I've asked this too but he said that everyone is free to list and give the rating base on what the people think. So, it's actually open for everyone who wants to gets listed and give ratings base on their thoughts, experience or personal opinion. But I like that idea that having the authors own thought as the basis and the rest will just be added by the users.
