Topic: [List] Suspected users that are abusing merit 3.0 - page 14. (Read 28003 times)

I'd like to suggest this guy and the guy who gave him most of his merits:  https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/denlv-1325560. 

There's no way in hell he should have that many, given the extremely poor quality of his posts.  It's users like this who don't deserve to rank up or to be compensated for shitposting. 

I tagged him but wanted to make this thread aware of this idiot.

Interestingly enough the author of this thread "killyou72" received 6 Merit from his alt account "killyou73".. :thinking_face:

These two gave each them merit as well as each other:
 
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/martin1221-1170003 martin1221 September 26, 2017
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/chrismarie1221-1244492 chrismarie1221 October 24, 2017,

Obviously both the same.

as I say killyou is a special kind of retard.. in the UK its called care in the community - people take individuals like killyou under supervision and take them on daytrips and the like. thats all that his sig campaign is doing - just helping out the local retard.

You should also see this then if you haven't yet:
 

---

It's up to the community now to decide.

I only just noticed myself - as killyou has been all high and mighty recently, I thought I would check it out - and the total dumbo has sent Merit to his own publicly known alt.. I mean how retarded can one person be?

I dont see why people are reacting now? The OP sent his alt merits at the very beginning, I think of it to be suspicious but I didn't say anything because I also had noticed that both killyou72 and killyou73 are there in the same campaign (?) too by seeing here :spreadsheet. Admission of killyou72 and killyou73 to be Alts :

---

Thinking of this to be an exception , I probably let go of it. Also I don't see why lutpin hasn't mentioned any rule of alts enrolling in that campaign is not allowed.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=408367

OP  - giving merit to himself from his alt.. this is blatant merit abuse - this user should be banned and burnt at the stake.

or kicked in the gonads by a donkey.

They've sent merit to each other. So what? I don't care if they are friends or not.
I like to read their posts.
Finally something refreshing in this forum. I have only 1 merit left and I will send it to alia_armelle because I want her to...errr...receive that merit 

My exact words regarding cheating were "I don't condone cheating". The act of cheating is usually physical romance or sexual activities between one person within and one person outside of a relationship. Watching a girl on a screen is akin to porn, and to me, is thus not cheating. If your girlfriend thinks watching porn is cheating, then you have a very abusive, and frankly, shitty relationship.

Do you want to have sex right now?

no

thats why men cheat.

women cheat for your reason

---

Well, I can’t stop the argument; so I myself will make somewhere else to take it:

poGium argues with nullius

This is not a high-priority argument to me; I’ve already spent too much time on it, so please be advised that I don’t intend to spend much more.  At least it will not be dropping the S/N ratio in this thread.

You are a chronic word-twister.


My exact words regarding cheating were "I don't condone cheating". The act of cheating is usually physical romance or sexual activities between one person within and one person outside of a relationship. Watching a girl on a screen is akin to porn, and to me, is thus not cheating. If your girlfriend thinks watching porn is cheating, then you have a very abusive, and frankly, shitty relationship.


Another lie. theymos's exact words are "I encourage people to give merit to posts that are objectively high-quality". Don't bullshit us when the facts are right there in front of us.


He probably merited me for reiterating something so glaringly obvious, that a seemingly smart individual like you doesn't seem to understand. Can you prove that God does not exist? Can you prove that unicorns aren't hiding in my underwear? Jesus.

I don't merit nullius because he is my friend, which he is. I merit him because his posts can be hilarious, informative, sexy and high-quality. I'm not the only one who feels this way (he's already one of the top-ranked merit receivers on the forum). Our very first communication ever was a post he made on my thread, and if you read it, you'll understand why I see him as so merit-worthy. There's no need to make up conspiracy theories - I suggest you get out there and make some friends yourself.

Can you tell me exactly where I wrote that you are nullius alt account? That's the problem with this thread. It's not just about alt accounts that abuse the Merit system, but also accounts that abuse the Merit system, which are not alt accounts (between friends). And in my opinion, this is clearly happening. Friends who give other friends sMerits.

---

And again. Where do I write something about alt account?


I have no grudge against her or you. She has shown me in her thread what morality she has in terms of girlfriend and boyfriend. I can not respect people who cheat on their partners! In her thread she has written that cheating is only bad when the other person finds out.

---

But let's get back to the merit system.

In this thread, the OP asks if it's okay to give a friend sMerits. The answers are clear, because it is said that you can give sMerits to a friend as long as the posts are high quality.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/merits-from-your-friends-2835874


In addition, theymos writes that you should give sMerits to posts that have an objectively high quality and not on posts you agree with. So as I understand it, you should not see the merit system as a "Like" button, but distribute sMerits to posts that have a high quality.


And now we look at this post. Did you give a sMerit here because it shows a high quality or because you (as always, it is ONLY nullius) agree?

---

What bothers me about the whole thing additionally is the double standard of some DTs. As I mentioned earlier, such a behavior is tolleriert, but on the other hand, other people are given a negative tag, because they get sMerits, which could have the same cause, as in this case.

---

I never said that I find it reprehensible that she takes drugs. It's her decision, why should I care? I only mentioned it because she opened a thread to it.

*sigh*

There is no way to prove a negative.

I think you could be satoshi with your vast knowledge can you prove you arent him?

nullius, let's give up this facade. I am satoshi.

Alia is /r/GirlsGoneBitcoin verified by theymos.  This is noted by theymos on her trust page; it means that theymos has verified that the person posting photos and videos is the person appearing in them.  This is her body (NSFW); so if we’re alts, then I have more elliptic curves than I hereto realized.

(Since I have also been accused of being both Lauda and Satoshi, does this mean transitively that Lauda and Satoshi are the girl in that photo?)


Well, Alia, were I your alt, then I’d be so much prettier.  Also, I would get paid to gratify myself.  Also, I would be able to gratify myself whilst receiving lessons from me in “the techy crypto stuff”.

By the way, congratulations on having invented Bitcoin!  (satoshi = nullius = alia)

---

Go ahead.  We do so enjoy being watched.

(For the record, I think that you have a grudge against Alia, me, or both of us.  You grossly misrepresented Alia’s posts in another thread (discussion is halfway through the linked post).)

---

I am not obligated to justify my merit award judgments; but I take pride in mine, so I will spell this out:

The first one was a reply to a post wherein somebody asked Alia for an outright sex-for-merits video deal.  Alia doesn’t do that—not with me, and not with anybody else.  She accepts money for sex videos.  She respects the merit system:  “I’d much rather you give me merit because you like my post.”  I deemed that a meritorious attitude—and I liked that post!

As Lauda noted, the latter two are from a thread titled “Ciphersex 101 [NSFW]” (soon to be continued).  There, we mix public cybersex with my lesson to her in applied cryptography.  In-context, the quoted statements are witty and sexy—thus, meritorious.

N.b. that contra the beliefs of many spammers, length of a post does not determine merit.  I once awarded actmyname +5 for a post which simply said, “ok”.⁰  Do you want to suggest that actmyname and I were abusing the merit system?  Perhaps that we are alts?

(0. In-context, that +5 “ok” post was a meritorious action:  Contemptuous dismissal of whining by a moron who got red-tagged for merit abuse.)

---

It is also clear from Alia’s statements on that thread that if I were seeking a video of her for my own gratification, I could obtain that quite easily.  I’m trying to push her into making forum history, as I said in my first-contact open letter to her.  When I hit Legendary status a few years hence, I want to be able to chat with other old-timers about how Alia from /r/GirlsGoneBitcoin lost that famous merit bet against herself.  Per what you say, I do think that’s good for the forum.

---

Now, this frivolous complaint by poGium has generated noise across two pages in a very important thread.  Unless someone says something which reasonably necessitates response in the same thread (defamatory, etc.), I will not be continuing this conversation here.  Take it up with me elsewhere if you want.

Thank you for this!

You are wrong here, she is nothing more than a cyber lady of the night

You should read about their bet,

I'd love to be an alt of nullius. If I was so good at the techy crypto stuff, wouldn't I be using my expertise to provide a constructive service rather than cam shows and gambling?