Topic: Listing on exchanges before ico end (Read 294 times)
yes for developing the market we have to think something new everyday so if they are thinking about list down the transaction then it is good but I don't think we should worry about ico it is going well so there is no chance that it will change
As far I understand this news is not true. Please share the details information about it. I think scammer try to spread false news toward the investor.
yes definitely I also think that listing the transaction record is a very good idea to progress the market but thinking that icon will end that makes me disappointed I don't think there is any reason to maintain this kind of view about the market
okay I must have to appreciate your curiosity about the market and the updates you have but why would anyone thinks that ico will end, but of course I appreciate the thought of listing down the transactions record it is better to have a written document
I know about a project that has already listed on exchange, not even one exchange while their ico is still on going but the logic is that the token will now start trading immediately. It is a kind of agreement. They have agreed with many exchange as ico is going on. I think it is a new strategy to make people to invest in the project.
wow that's great. keep working hard. hopefully you will be succeeded. and please share with us you project details.
I know a project listed on the 4 exchanges before it's finished, and you know, the token on the exchange is 5 times higher than the current ICO price. I think it's a sophisticated trick to attract investment, and that's a bad behavior being condemned
The project mistakes probably varied on not veen well informed
Because they could have listed and not be available for trade
But they allowed lapses and now are forced to stop trading activities so dumping can be prevented
It’s not wise to allow exchange trading when ico is still on
Because they could have listed and not be available for trade
But they allowed lapses and now are forced to stop trading activities so dumping can be prevented
It’s not wise to allow exchange trading when ico is still on
I do not think it is a wise thing to list on an exchange before even ico is not over, maybe that project is a scam they want to raise as much money as possible from ico and also try to sell millions of tokens on the exchange, sounds very suspicious to me.
I didn't get what project you talking about and I am curious the project you talking about. May I know aboout the project?
There is no problem over a coin getting listed during or even before ICO. That is not the reason the coin was delisted, may be the term could not abide to the rule that was given by the exchanger.
There are different kind of project done in ICO. Here the project is not specified but listing of exchange for a project is always long so it is not a bad idea to delist.
I also remember project that listed its coin on some exchanges before the end of ICO - this was Paycent. I remember that it was negatively reflected in the cost of the token due to which the team abandoned the plans for the additional stages of the ICO.
Which exchange has listed them even when they know that the ICO hasn't ended yet? However, if they want to remove themselves from the list the owner needs to step up or at least the people who were responsible for listing their ICO on the exchange platform. A simple request for delisting would do the job.
If the ICO has already answered all the questions and queries of the exchange and have reached an agreement in principle then it wouldn't be really hard for them to delist themselves. All they need to do is contact the support of the exchange platform and provide valid proof of ownership to remove it from their listing.
The cryptographic money trades are the noticeable players with a specific end goal to settle the digital money showcase which is notable for its instability. The most prevailing one, where 99% of all the cryptographic money exchanges is vested with the Centralized crypto trades.
i think that is very good enough for the bounties,,because it will be more good to list before the distribution of token self,,once it get listed before the end of ico,,people will be just selling and buying at that time,,not that they will be waiting again for exchange
I think that is the wrong way the ico project does and will make the price different between the ico price and the exchange price. Applicants will choose to buy on the exchange at a low price due to sales from bounty and airdrop participants.
Listing on exchange before end of ICO is happening with some ICOs such as just concluded Cyclean but there is no any news that they will be delisting, instead they'll be adding more exchanges.. I think there will be a specific reason why the ICO you're talking about is delisting maybe good or bad although it's hard to say anything since you didn't point specifically to the ICO you're talking about and the exchange
It is better to directly contact with the listing site or exchange if the owner wants to delist. In that case, the owner or the authority who were responsible for listing the ICO should take the step to reach out to the platform and request for a delist till the ICO is ended.
Jump to: