Topic: Little bit suspicious... (Read 5409 times)

cryptonit 0: -0 / +0   2014-12-01   5.00000000   Reference   paid in advance. nice contact. full trustworthy!

cryptonit 0: -0 / +0   2014-12-03   7.00000000   Reference   Manages my multi BTC investment with great care. Diamond Clound Mining. Fully trustworthy.

red text usually damages who deserves to get damaged
with rare exceptions tbh

Using trust simply as a way to enforce the "rules" is not uncommon here, as the moderators just deal with miscategorized posts and spam. Now, I did extensively view this user's history and I would trust him, which is why I have not left him negative trust like Vod did. However, I understand his viewpoint.

hi vod

please reread the thread
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9768188

and consider change ur rating to neutral

i understand now what i did was wrong
but i didnt invest enought time to full understand the system

thx for give some until yet always as honorable know community member a second chance
the educational part of ur rating did reach its full effect already

br

cryptonit aka helmut siedl
https://www.linkedin.com/pub/helmut-siedl/92/460/586

a real person and not someone who try to do any shady business
(i will also post this in thread as a open letter)

I downgraded my rating to a neutral rating as he does show some kind of remorse...but that's remaining as a note. At the very least it was written in a very bad and ambiguous way. I must repeat though. If you think this guy is trustworthy, sure, leave him a positive rating, he may even get a couple DefaultTrust ones. But that doesn't mean what made him get negative trust is invalid and that the system is broken. You just make yourselves look like shills, unfortunately.

Wow - I have been down for a couple days (machine debacle) but am coming back to see all of these trust issues.  I think this is hilarious to say the least.  Cryptonit is so trustworthy.  He sends his full name, address, and contact info with a contract for purchasing shares.  If someone were untrustworthy I doubt they would divulge that much information.  In addition I have been speaking with Cryptonit and have purchased Diamond shares without a second thought of whether I could trust him or not.  Mistrust never crossed my mind.  Stay strong Cryptonit.  I have no problem with your language barrier.  If I don't understand something you are saying I just re-read it and then if I still don't understand - guess what - I ask you! :-)  Don't give up speaking on this forum - that would be the dictator's way of winning. - pokeytex

Cryptonit, after having read your latest negative rating, and its insular self-righteous motivation, made by an autocratic default trustlist member, I have changed my mind regarding Diamond not leaving bitcointalk.

The bitcointalk’s hierarchal structure seems more like the worst dictatorship. This doesn’t go hand in hand with the freedom of cryptocurrency and its good intentions.
This is no place for a serious coin like Diamond, which has a goal to reach people outside the cryptoworld and go mainstream. No person used to democracy and freedom of speech will accept an environment like this, where you can discredit a person with whatever you want just because you don’t like how that person is asking you questions or because you don’t think the person’s actions is cool. And where you are able to arbitrarily besmirch anyone just because you are hiding behind an account added to the default trustlist. So I agree with the earlier suggestion of moving to DMD forum at bit.diamonds.

Regarding language misinterpretations, I think that a forum should be open for everybody. It shouldn’t matter if english is your native language or not, DMD should be for all people regardless of nationality. So Cryptonit, if you step back for language reasons I think it’s wrong. You are very helpful and if somebody don’t understand your answers they can always ask again. That being said I do understand if you need time for other tasks. My trust in you is unchanged.

Marketplace trust

If you're still confused, you can always search for threads where this question has been answered before.

Hi people
Just for clarification, and to answer the question that began all of this, could someone please explain the way the trust system works? How is it that someone who has been here for months or years, made many hundreds of posts and hosted numerous trust-based activities can have a trust of zero? And how does one, after establishing the above attributes, go about raising their trust score without generating the flaming we have seen here?
A comprehensive answer would be most appreciated.
Regards
chilo

That's not how it works. You do not "apply" for someone's trust - someone will leave you positive trust if they deem you trustworthy, but you don't request it.

The ignorance is real here. That's kind of a ridiculous PM, especially to theymos of all people. cryptonit seems very unaccustomed to this type of community.

That's not how it works. You do not "apply" for someone's trust - someone will leave you positive trust if they deem you trustworthy, but you don't request it.

The ignorance is real here. That's kind of a ridiculous PM, especially to theymos of all people. cryptonit seems very unaccustomed to this type of community.

You offered to pay me for, essentially, positive trust. Now all the people involved in DMD are coming to try and create warfare over a trust-related issue. No-one cares if you had deals with him or trust him - that doesn't take away from the situation.