Author

Topic: Little bit suspicious... (Read 5409 times)

legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
December 27, 2016, 08:00:32 AM
#57
Accounts Probably Connected:

Proof:

Name:    cryptonit u=206368 http://archive.is/uxhva
Posts:    5086
Activity:    1106
Position:    Legendary
Date Registered:    30 December 2013, 05:17:48

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/cryptonit-206368 http://archive.is/G3dDu

Name:    popshot u=207814 http://archive.is/tVPms
Posts:    716
Activity:    716
Position:    Hero Member
Date Registered:    31 December 2013, 20:31:15

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/popshot-207814 http://archive.is/WZRSf

popshot receives trust from cryptonit

Quote
cryptonit 0: -0 / +0   2014-12-01   5.00000000   Reference   paid in advance. nice contact. full trustworthy!

and receives trust from them in return:

Quote
cryptonit 0: -0 / +0   2014-12-03   7.00000000   Reference   Manages my multi BTC investment with great care. Diamond Clound Mining. Fully trustworthy.

Both use the same URL https://cloudmining.bit.diamonds/ to vouch...

cryptonit grovels to Vod and DiamondCardz to remove negative trust from attempting to buy positive trust:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/little-bit-suspicious-884262 http://archive.is/F82qq

Both of their trust walls have numerous early vouches (given and received) from other DMD supporters who over 2013 & 2014 register within days / or a week of each other - start with the ones who post in this thread

Both their General Statistics closely match each-others for the surges and dips in the hour-by-hour comparison.

I can't say for certain that they are definitely Alts, however, the sheer number of early vouches from UID's registered in 2013 & 2014 that are still involved in DMD and are still active up to and including today's date?

Just a Little bit suspicious...
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1118
December 11, 2014, 12:14:07 PM
#56
Nah. It will remain. It still applies.
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
December 10, 2014, 03:53:18 PM
#55
thx vod
i think thread can be locked
lesson learned
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
December 07, 2014, 08:51:50 PM
#54
red text usually damages who deserves to get damaged
with rare exceptions tbh

a fresh account only created to post in scam accusation forum part
for sure trustworthy  Grin at least more than me if we look whats written below our names

i learned im no heavyweight on this forum
but at least i have the balls to always speak with my true account
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
December 07, 2014, 08:21:40 PM
#53
red text usually damages who deserves to get damaged
with rare exceptions tbh
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
December 07, 2014, 03:04:29 PM
#52

Using trust simply as a way to enforce the "rules" is not uncommon here, as the moderators just deal with miscategorized posts and spam. Now, I did extensively view this user's history and I would trust him, which is why I have not left him negative trust like Vod did. However, I understand his viewpoint.

thx for ur trust

but be silent i dont think the issue will be ever solved

i didnt hear a single word from vod  Sad

i understand what u say about enforce rule u did successful teach me what was wrong  Lips sealed

but i request to not damage whole diamond community for a mistake i made and wont repeat

as prime spokesman for the community that red text is damaging us all
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 509
December 07, 2014, 01:52:10 PM
#51
I think if there are hard facts and trust has been broken, then by all means post some hard facts, that YOU have personally experienced. I looked into diamond cloud, and at this time is not for me, as I have a large farm, but guys, if you personally have not been ripped off, dont try to hurt someone else trying to get ahead, by posting your OPINION.

Vegas

Continuing to post nonsense like this is not going to do you any favors.

Vod left you negative trust because you violated one of the cardinal "rules" of this forum, which is not to buy trust. How do your loyal acolytes not see this? Are they simply blinded by your glory?



Using trust simply as a way to enforce the "rules" is not uncommon here, as the moderators just deal with miscategorized posts and spam. Now, I did extensively view this user's history and I would trust him, which is why I have not left him negative trust like Vod did. However, I understand his viewpoint.
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
December 07, 2014, 12:21:56 PM
#50
open letter to vod
Quote
hi vod

please reread the thread
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9768188

and consider change ur rating to neutral

i understand now what i did was wrong
but i didnt invest enought time to full understand the system

thx for give some until yet always as honorable know community member a second chance
the educational part of ur rating did reach its full effect already

br

cryptonit aka helmut siedl
https://www.linkedin.com/pub/helmut-siedl/92/460/586

a real person and not someone who try to do any shady business
(i will also post this in thread as a open letter)
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
December 07, 2014, 12:13:54 PM
#49
I downgraded my rating to a neutral rating as he does show some kind of remorse...but that's remaining as a note. At the very least it was written in a very bad and ambiguous way. I must repeat though. If you think this guy is trustworthy, sure, leave him a positive rating, he may even get a couple DefaultTrust ones. But that doesn't mean what made him get negative trust is invalid and that the system is broken. You just make yourselves look like shills, unfortunately.

thx DiamondCardz

i for sure learned my lesson and wont try use a system i dont understand
i will let trust naturally grow someday people who rate me and even myself will reach the rank to make our ratings visible i hope

i will try ask vod to give me the same chance as u did

im sorry that this caused us all so much inconvenience
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1118
December 07, 2014, 11:39:31 AM
#48
I downgraded my rating to a neutral rating as he does show some kind of remorse...but that's remaining as a note. At the very least it was written in a very bad and ambiguous way. I must repeat though. If you think this guy is trustworthy, sure, leave him a positive rating, he may even get a couple DefaultTrust ones. But that doesn't mean what made him get negative trust is invalid and that the system is broken. You just make yourselves look like shills, unfortunately.
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
December 07, 2014, 09:17:56 AM
#47
My trust in cryptonit is also unchanged and the whole trust system is not really transparent, probably I would have made the same mistake. Get over it. Personally I think cryptonit is a good DMD community manager, because not everything is perfectly polished including his english. If something seems too good to be true, it naturally makes one suspicious. Hence, I think he should remain on this position for some time longer, because everybody recognizes his dedication and that is not something that comes easily.

Wow - I have been down for a couple days (machine debacle) but am coming back to see all of these trust issues.  I think this is hilarious to say the least.  Cryptonit is so trustworthy.  He sends his full name, address, and contact info with a contract for purchasing shares.  If someone were untrustworthy I doubt they would divulge that much information.  In addition I have been speaking with Cryptonit and have purchased Diamond shares without a second thought of whether I could trust him or not.  Mistrust never crossed my mind.  Stay strong Cryptonit.  I have no problem with your language barrier.  If I don't understand something you are saying I just re-read it and then if I still don't understand - guess what - I ask you! :-)  Don't give up speaking on this forum - that would be the dictator's way of winning. - pokeytex
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
December 07, 2014, 02:59:30 AM
#46
Cryptonit, even if I trust you and understand your intentions, I must say you expressed yourself rather clumsy in your PM.

In my opinion the Trust system itself seems untrustworthy. How can one negative rating from one Default Trustlist member, who has never had any business with Cryptonit whatsoever, override all other people’s positive ratings who actually have had business with Cryptonit? That is totally preposterous. Furthermore the negative rating is based on a poorly worded PM and is blown out of proportion.
Is it possible to get a detailed motivation from Vod regarding the actions taken?

I hope this matter will be possible to resolve and put behind. I don’t think DMD should have to leave Bitcointalk because of this.


i agree hallared i did write maybe not in best possible way
but u know im busy man and the forum trust was a low priority issue

for me no matter how we solve this issue its good to make it easier for me to make a decision

the decision is to seek a BTT community manager someone of u
someone who can talk better english than me

i want to focus on my real job

and that is together with alex and daniel design our future and make it happen

i spend way to much here doing a community manager and a single forum marketing/promotion job where i am not the ideal man

please apply per PM toward popshot for BTT community manager slot
additional we seek marketing and promotion interested people

i will step a bit back

i did damage DMD the second time
once long ago when people said i damage the community by my bad written english
and now a second time

i know i did way more good for DMD than damage

but still thats no reason to not try avoid future damage

take the chance to involve urself deeper with DMD

apply to help popshot managing BTT

for future promotions run by me make sure u follow twitter or linkedin or our own forum

https://twitter.com/CryptonitDMD
https://www.linkedin.com/pub/helmut-siedl/92/460/586
http://bit.diamonds/community/


Cryptonit, after having read your latest negative rating, and its insular self-righteous motivation, made by an autocratic default trustlist member, I have changed my mind regarding Diamond not leaving bitcointalk.

The bitcointalk’s hierarchal structure seems more like the worst dictatorship. This doesn’t go hand in hand with the freedom of cryptocurrency and its good intentions.
This is no place for a serious coin like Diamond, which has a goal to reach people outside the cryptoworld and go mainstream. No person used to democracy and freedom of speech will accept an environment like this, where you can discredit a person with whatever you want just because you don’t like how that person is asking you questions or because you don’t think the person’s actions is cool. And where you are able to arbitrarily besmirch anyone just because you are hiding behind an account added to the default trustlist. So I agree with the earlier suggestion of moving to DMD forum at bit.diamonds.

Regarding language misinterpretations, I think that a forum should be open for everybody. It shouldn’t matter if english is your native language or not, DMD should be for all people regardless of nationality. So Cryptonit, if you step back for language reasons I think it’s wrong. You are very helpful and if somebody don’t understand your answers they can always ask again. That being said I do understand if you need time for other tasks. My trust in you is unchanged.

full member
Activity: 145
Merit: 100
December 07, 2014, 01:43:58 AM
#45
Hi people
Just for clarification, and to answer the question that began all of this, could someone please explain the way the trust system works? How is it that someone who has been here for months or years, made many hundreds of posts and hosted numerous trust-based activities can have a trust of zero? And how does one, after establishing the above attributes, go about raising their trust score without generating the flaming we have seen here?
A comprehensive answer would be most appreciated.
Regards
chilo

Marketplace trust

If you're still confused, you can always search for threads where this question has been answered before.

Thanks for your reply.
I have just spent some time following your links and still a little confused. I am experimenting with the trust list but not getting results I expect. I have turned off the default list (~ in front) however the negative ratings remain? I will keep trying.
Regards
chilo


Actually, turning off default trust has had desired effect.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 509
December 06, 2014, 11:32:32 PM
#44
Hi people
Just for clarification, and to answer the question that began all of this, could someone please explain the way the trust system works? How is it that someone who has been here for months or years, made many hundreds of posts and hosted numerous trust-based activities can have a trust of zero? And how does one, after establishing the above attributes, go about raising their trust score without generating the flaming we have seen here?
A comprehensive answer would be most appreciated.
Regards
chilo

Marketplace trust

If you're still confused, you can always search for threads where this question has been answered before.
full member
Activity: 145
Merit: 100
December 06, 2014, 09:48:01 PM
#43
Hi people
Just for clarification, and to answer the question that began all of this, could someone please explain the way the trust system works? How is it that someone who has been here for months or years, made many hundreds of posts and hosted numerous trust-based activities can have a trust of zero? And how does one, after establishing the above attributes, go about raising their trust score without generating the flaming we have seen here?
A comprehensive answer would be most appreciated.
Regards
chilo
newbie
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
December 06, 2014, 08:19:30 PM
#42
2 days before i contacted diamondcardz

i wrote a PM to the trustsystem inventor (at least i think he is)

its not like i didnt try follow a way by contact the moderators/admins

but they didnt reply

i always asked for them same as with diamondcardz to check me out if i am trustworthy in their opinion

i never asked for being blind classified as trustworthy

http://i59.tinypic.com/24c6yhk.png

That's not how it works. You do not "apply" for someone's trust - someone will leave you positive trust if they deem you trustworthy, but you don't request it.

The ignorance is real here. That's kind of a ridiculous PM, especially to theymos of all people. cryptonit seems very unaccustomed to this type of community.
In theory, some people on level 1 default trust could take applications like this as there is no uniform way for someone to add someone to their trust list.

I would say that his 'application' would likely be denied as he has not proven himself to be trustworthy
legendary
Activity: 1672
Merit: 1046
Here we go again
December 06, 2014, 08:15:16 PM
#41
2 days before i contacted diamondcardz

i wrote a PM to the trustsystem inventor (at least i think he is)

its not like i didnt try follow a way by contact the moderators/admins

but they didnt reply

i always asked for them same as with diamondcardz to check me out if i am trustworthy in their opinion

i never asked for being blind classified as trustworthy



That's not how it works. You do not "apply" for someone's trust - someone will leave you positive trust if they deem you trustworthy, but you don't request it.

The ignorance is real here. That's kind of a ridiculous PM, especially to theymos of all people. cryptonit seems very unaccustomed to this type of community.


I invested some ammount in DMD.
So i am not neutral on this but this -11 rating is complete nonsense.

This forum turns more n more into a complete snakepit.
#sad
full member
Activity: 145
Merit: 100
December 06, 2014, 05:47:59 PM
#40
You offered to pay me for, essentially, positive trust. Now all the people involved in DMD are coming to try and create warfare over a trust-related issue. No-one cares if you had deals with him or trust him - that doesn't take away from the situation.



No one from DMD thread is making warfare.
Regards
chilo
legendary
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000
December 06, 2014, 05:12:18 PM
#39
It's possible that if you positively contribute to the community and you don't do anything like this again, that in a few months you can message the people who left you negative feedback and they'll remove it. The point you're trying to make doesn't make sense to me, just because you don't like the system (I'm almost positive you knew how it worked or else you wouldn't of PM'ed someone on the default trust list) doesn't mean you can cheat to get an advantage. There's a process to everything, you should of made a thread about it. I don't think this guy is a scammer, but the question is, was he trying to gain positive trust to pull off a big scam?


Btw, you can create a reputation thread here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=129.0 and have your feedback posted there and have a link to it on your profile.
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1118
December 06, 2014, 04:50:43 PM
#38
You offered to pay me for, essentially, positive trust. Now all the people involved in DMD are coming to try and create warfare over a trust-related issue. No-one cares if you had deals with him or trust him - that doesn't take away from the situation.

hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 509
December 06, 2014, 04:32:59 PM
#37
I've already replied with a suggestion but the cryponit doesn't want to do that. I have assisted all I can.

i had not a single interaction with vad
he read this thread and branded me
without exchange a word without post here without reply to my PM

what do u expect from me
Yes, because for the 15th time, you did something that makes him not trust you. He doesn't have to personally deal with you to leave you a negative rating.

Trying to prove him wrong somehow is not going to cause him to remove the negative trust. Listen to KWH.
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
December 06, 2014, 04:26:48 PM
#36
I've already replied with a suggestion but the cryponit doesn't want to do that. I have assisted all I can.

i had not a single interaction with vad
he read this thread and branded me
without exchange a word without post here without reply to my PM

what do u expect from me
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
December 06, 2014, 04:23:24 PM
#35
You are on default trust, you can negative trust him for trying to solicit/buy trust

   
Updated Nov 25

I am selling my Hero, senior member accounts, full member, and jr member accounts.

One of my hero accounts is on default trust, my asking price for this one is 3.5 BTC. My other hero accounts can be purchased for 2.3 BTC.

Starting at .44 BTC for senior accounts (several available).

Jr member (20+ available) accounts start at .04 BTC and Full Member (12+ available) accounts start at .16 BTC

Most prices can be discussed/negotiated.

Escrow is accepted. You cannot know the username prior to payment.

PM me with offers.

now who sell here trust?
KWH
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1045
In Collateral I Trust.
December 06, 2014, 04:19:36 PM
#34
Quote
if i can give u anything for ur helping hand to make my positive rating visible just tell me mate

Requesting a mass add to the Default list along with the above message is seen as attempting to purchase an add to the Default Trust list. In short: Buying Trust. This will be given a negative every time and if you need an explanation of why, it only solidifies Vod's reasoning was sound.

Unfortunately your comment is ignorant and and uninformed. If you bothered to check the history of how we ( dmd community) or even asked any involved, you would see we have been trying to discover how the trust sytem works and why cryptonit had a zero rating. For myself he is the only person in all crypto who I can truthfully trust. This probably is the same for the others involved.
Please assist our community and your forum by working to undo this unjust decision and its aftermath.
Kind Regards
chilo


That's your opinion but I see things a bit differently. You can trust him but from his attempt to purchase Trust for you all, I do not. It does NOT matter what good he has done in your little world in this little world he screwed up and was labeled for it. Really funny how you decry injustice for his wrong actions, the system is broken and it really doesn't matter yet you want the broken system, that means nothing, label to be removed. I see.

Hi KWH
I see you and others do great work keeping a lid on real scammers.
I guess the reason we feel hardly done by is because cryptonit does not fall in this category. I see the wording of some of the correspondence could lead to misunderstanding and perhaps should have been made on an open thread. However it should not result in cryptonits reputation (and by association all users of the DMD thread) being so heavily besmirched. The reasoning for his negative rating may be factually correct, but does not reflect his intentions or honourable service.
 The last 4-5 pages on our thread show how we come to this unfortunate outcome. I initiated the discussion regarding trust, and attempts were made to understand the trust system. Information regarding this is difficult to find.
Please assist us in correcting this misunderstanding.
Regards
chilo


I've already replied with a suggestion but the cryponit doesn't want to do that. I have assisted all I can.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 509
December 06, 2014, 04:03:36 PM
#33
Quote
if i can give u anything for ur helping hand to make my positive rating visible just tell me mate

Requesting a mass add to the Default list along with the above message is seen as attempting to purchase an add to the Default Trust list. In short: Buying Trust. This will be given a negative every time and if you need an explanation of why, it only solidifies Vod's reasoning was sound.

Unfortunately your comment is ignorant and and uninformed. If you bothered to check the history of how we ( dmd community) or even asked any involved, you would see we have been trying to discover how the trust sytem works and why cryptonit had a zero rating. For myself he is the only person in all crypto who I can truthfully trust. This probably is the same for the others involved.
Please assist our community and your forum by working to undo this unjust decision and its aftermath.
Kind Regards
chilo


That's your opinion but I see things a bit differently. You can trust him but from his attempt to purchase Trust for you all, I do not. It does NOT matter what good he has done in your little world in this little world he screwed up and was labeled for it. Really funny how you decry injustice for his wrong actions, the system is broken and it really doesn't matter yet you want the broken system, that means nothing, label to be removed. I see.

Hi KWH
I see you and others do great work keeping a lid on real scammers.
I guess the reason we feel hardly done by is because cryptonit does not fall in this category. I see the wording of some of the correspondence could lead to misunderstanding and perhaps should have been made on an open thread. However it should not result in cryptonits reputation (and by association all users of the DMD thread) being so heavily besmirched. The reasoning for his negative rating may be factually correct, but does not reflect his intentions or honourable service.
 The last 4-5 pages on our thread show how we come to this unfortunate outcome. I initiated the discussion regarding trust, and attempts were made to understand the trust system. Information regarding this is difficult to find.
Please assist us in correcting this misunderstanding.
Regards
chilo


This is true.

Really just seems to be a case of ignorance.
full member
Activity: 145
Merit: 100
December 06, 2014, 03:40:07 PM
#32
Quote
if i can give u anything for ur helping hand to make my positive rating visible just tell me mate

Requesting a mass add to the Default list along with the above message is seen as attempting to purchase an add to the Default Trust list. In short: Buying Trust. This will be given a negative every time and if you need an explanation of why, it only solidifies Vod's reasoning was sound.

Unfortunately your comment is ignorant and and uninformed. If you bothered to check the history of how we ( dmd community) or even asked any involved, you would see we have been trying to discover how the trust sytem works and why cryptonit had a zero rating. For myself he is the only person in all crypto who I can truthfully trust. This probably is the same for the others involved.
Please assist our community and your forum by working to undo this unjust decision and its aftermath.
Kind Regards
chilo


That's your opinion but I see things a bit differently. You can trust him but from his attempt to purchase Trust for you all, I do not. It does NOT matter what good he has done in your little world in this little world he screwed up and was labeled for it. Really funny how you decry injustice for his wrong actions, the system is broken and it really doesn't matter yet you want the broken system, that means nothing, label to be removed. I see.

Hi KWH
I see you and others do great work keeping a lid on real scammers.
I guess the reason we feel hardly done by is because cryptonit does not fall in this category. I see the wording of some of the correspondence could lead to misunderstanding and perhaps should have been made on an open thread. However it should not result in cryptonits reputation (and by association all users of the DMD thread) being so heavily besmirched. The reasoning for his negative rating may be factually correct, but does not reflect his intentions or honourable service.
 The last 4-5 pages on our thread show how we come to this unfortunate outcome. I initiated the discussion regarding trust, and attempts were made to understand the trust system. Information regarding this is difficult to find.
Please assist us in correcting this misunderstanding.
Regards
chilo
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1737
"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."
December 06, 2014, 03:01:01 PM
#31
Quote
if i can give u anything for ur helping hand to make my positive rating visible just tell me mate

Requesting a mass add to the Default list along with the above message is seen as attempting to purchase an add to the Default Trust list. In short: Buying Trust. This will be given a negative every time and if you need an explanation of why, it only solidifies Vod's reasoning was sound.

Unfortunately your comment is ignorant and and uninformed.....

No, this whole sorry episode is due to your hero's ignorance of the trust system and uninformed attempt to buy into it.
As he says

its a matter of lost face

Get over it.
full member
Activity: 145
Merit: 100
December 06, 2014, 02:51:44 PM
#30
My opinion :


I think we need a decentralized trust sistem (I mean in the new forum software) , I know it will be difficult to do but this is the solution.  If you don't trade for 3 months you lose  your status of defaultTrust "user" ( If is it not right , propose something better). Thanks for the attention Wink.

Thanks for your contribution. Please support us (DMD community) in this misunderstanding.
Regards
chilo
KWH
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1045
In Collateral I Trust.
December 06, 2014, 02:45:20 PM
#29
Quote
if i can give u anything for ur helping hand to make my positive rating visible just tell me mate

Requesting a mass add to the Default list along with the above message is seen as attempting to purchase an add to the Default Trust list. In short: Buying Trust. This will be given a negative every time and if you need an explanation of why, it only solidifies Vod's reasoning was sound.

Unfortunately your comment is ignorant and and uninformed. If you bothered to check the history of how we ( dmd community) or even asked any involved, you would see we have been trying to discover how the trust sytem works and why cryptonit had a zero rating. For myself he is the only person in all crypto who I can truthfully trust. This probably is the same for the others involved.
Please assist our community and your forum by working to undo this unjust decision and its aftermath.
Kind Regards
chilo


That's your opinion but I see things a bit differently. You can trust him but from his attempt to purchase Trust for you all, I do not. It does NOT matter what good he has done in your little world in this little world he screwed up and was labeled for it. Really funny how you decry injustice for his wrong actions, the system is broken and it really doesn't matter yet you want the broken system, that means nothing, label to be removed. I see.
KWH
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1045
In Collateral I Trust.
December 06, 2014, 02:40:45 PM
#28
But my feedback is not visible
Positive feedback points are invisible

Why do people keep saying this? It's not so, I can see the trust that has been left for you.
If I was going to deal with you, I look at all your trust, not just what it says over there

lol im with this forums since nearly a year and i dont know how this system works

i see red written careful scammer
or green written points that looks like this dude is ok

i never did open that trust page before some community member asked me make the positive feedback i got visible

and i expect 95% of community act the same way
so for them my positive feedback is invisible
and im marked as a
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!
because of the opinion of one single person
who did never interact with me

tell me how that isnt flawed and damage my visible reputation

You are not understanding because you don't want to or just really that ignorant. The red left for you is clearly explained. YOU screwed up. YOU put yourself in a bad light with your actions and YOU fail to understand? Mind boggling to say the least. The red does not say scammer it says caution and rightfully so. In this case, the system works as it should.
I can't see how you have interacted as much as you have yet fail to see where you went wrong. This clearly shows to me you lack good judgement. Did you by chance purchase the account?
full member
Activity: 145
Merit: 100
December 06, 2014, 02:35:24 PM
#27
Quote
if i can give u anything for ur helping hand to make my positive rating visible just tell me mate

Requesting a mass add to the Default list along with the above message is seen as attempting to purchase an add to the Default Trust list. In short: Buying Trust. This will be given a negative every time and if you need an explanation of why, it only solidifies Vod's reasoning was sound.

Unfortunately your comment is ignorant and and uninformed. If you bothered to check the history of how we ( dmd community) or even asked any involved, you would see we have been trying to discover how the trust sytem works and why cryptonit had a zero rating. For myself he is the only person in all crypto who I can truthfully trust. This probably is the same for the others involved.
Please assist our community and your forum by working to undo this unjust decision and its aftermath.
Kind Regards
chilo
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
December 06, 2014, 01:24:28 PM
#26
But my feedback is not visible
Positive feedback points are invisible

Why do people keep saying this? It's not so, I can see the trust that has been left for you.
If I was going to deal with you, I look at all your trust, not just what it says over there

lol im with this forums since nearly a year and i dont know how this system works

i see red written careful scammer
or green written points that looks like this dude is ok

i never did open that trust page before some community member asked me make the positive feedback i got visible

and i expect 95% of community act the same way
so for them my positive feedback is invisible
and im marked as a
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!
because of the opinion of one single person
who did never interact with me

tell me how that isnt flawed and damage my visible reputation
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
December 06, 2014, 01:20:50 PM
#25
Hopefully, when the new forum layout comes, low level feedback will be immediately visible on our profiles, not hidden as it is now. 
They are not hidden. If you are using the default settings then you can click on show ratings to display any "untrusted" feedback.

You can also change your settings so you see other people's untrusted feedback by default. Profile -> Forum Profile Information -> check Show untrusted feedback by default then click save.

You will never be able to control how other people view your own feedback.
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
December 06, 2014, 12:56:16 PM
#24
Hopefully, when the new forum layout comes, low level feedback will be immediately visible on our profiles, not hidden as it is now.  

thats the only answer that make sence
with visible low level feedback that situation we in now would have never happened

someone who is busy leading a coin to success and manage a cloudmining investment product

and dont had lot time to research how this trust system works (which is really hard to find out)
and who did attempt to solve the problem of invisible positive feedback
without any bad intentions

and yes im unused to such systems
and yes if we can clear see i didnt choose the best way to solve the problem

the best would have been to ignore the invisible positive feedback
but how i could ignore visible negative feedback that is basically damaging my business

i know for sure in austria i could enforce a  "action for injunction"
but here im helpless i cant defend myself
and restore my "trust" setting in a undamaged state
legendary
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000
December 06, 2014, 12:21:35 PM
#23
You were bribing someone to add members to their trust list that they had no idea about. What did you expect to happen?

"if i can give u anything for ur helping hand to make my positive rating visible just tell me mate"

Imagine if you were running a business and someone you never met came up to you and asked you to give good recommendations to a list of people you have never met. You obviously wouldn't do it because 1) Your reputation could be ruined if they find out you're giving out fake recommendations or 2) People will come to you and ask why you recommended them and not use your service anymore.

I honestly don't know how your managing people's BTC while being so incompetent. Is it because English is not your first language? You basically set the trap and put yourself in it by messaging a default trust member asking to falsely boost your trust rating in exchange for a "helping hand", something the majority of the list actively tries to stop from happening.

legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1737
"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."
December 06, 2014, 12:12:01 PM
#22
i didnt want to pay him

Cognitive dissonance.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1737
"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."
December 06, 2014, 11:51:05 AM
#21
But my feedback is not visible
Positive feedback points are invisible

Why do people keep saying this? It's not so, I can see the trust that has been left for you.
If I was going to deal with you, I look at all your trust, not just what it says over there
<-------


The idea of being able to get on level 2 simply by applying or recommending someone is ridiculous. It would lead to a torrent of trust and feedback bartering in order to appear to be a suitable candidate.
The way to neutralise the over importance of level 2 trust is to leave more of your own, so that prospective trading partners get as much information as possible when they look at profiles.
Hopefully, when the new forum layout comes, low level feedback will be immediately visible on our profiles, not hidden by default as it is now. 
full member
Activity: 150
Merit: 101
The hen or the egg
December 06, 2014, 11:43:30 AM
#20
I just want to state that the trust feedback I gave Helmut Siedl (aka Cryptonit) is my own true words. He has proven his reliability several times and have earned my trust. I have invested twice in the DMD Cloudmining and he has always acted with professionalism and handled my investment according to our agreements. There is no scam involved in this whatsoever.

My personal opinion about Helmut Siedl is that he is a valuable member of DMD Foundation and is an honorable person with high morale and good intentions.

Finally I want to make one thing clear, this account is my personal account here on Bitcointalk. If someone thinks otherwise, that person should contact me prior to making any statements.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
December 06, 2014, 10:14:32 AM
#19
unambiguously voting system is not perfect and needs some work
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
December 06, 2014, 09:19:09 AM
#18
My opinion :


I think we need a decentralized trust sistem (I mean in the new forum software) , I know it will be difficult to do but this is the solution.  If you don't trade for 3 months you lose  your status of defaultTrust "user" ( If is it not right , propose something better). Thanks for the attention Wink.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 509
December 06, 2014, 09:16:04 AM
#17
2 days before i contacted diamondcardz

i wrote a PM to the trustsystem inventor (at least i think he is)

its not like i didnt try follow a way by contact the moderators/admins

but they didnt reply

i always asked for them same as with diamondcardz to check me out if i am trustworthy in their opinion

i never asked for being blind classified as trustworthy



That's not how it works. You do not "apply" for someone's trust - someone will leave you positive trust if they deem you trustworthy, but you don't request it.

The ignorance is real here. That's kind of a ridiculous PM, especially to theymos of all people. cryptonit seems very unaccustomed to this type of community.
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
December 06, 2014, 08:58:25 AM
#16
I would suggest this:
Make a public thread, apologize for your mistake and once this is done, ask vod to reconsider.
Remember there are no guarantees he will but worth a shot.

this here is the thread
i already said im sorry if my pm was missunderstanding and someone could belive because of bad english i want to pay for votes

that was never intended

i just see lot time is involved analyze me and then rate if i am trustworthy

and i am willing invest time too for someone who invest time for me

thats what i call a helping hand

i have to say sorry to diamondcardz for confuse him up to a degree he was thinking there is a scam atempt....

and i cant understand how something like give a bad rating can be done without invest time to analyze the man

just check the responce in out thread
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9756239
u wont find any bad word there written about me
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
December 06, 2014, 08:52:52 AM
#15
2 days before i contacted diamondcardz

i wrote a PM to the trustsystem inventor (at least i think he is)

its not like i didnt try follow a way by contact the moderators/admins

but they didnt reply

i always asked for them same as with diamondcardz to check me out if i am trustworthy in their opinion

i never asked for being blind classified as trustworthy

KWH
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1045
In Collateral I Trust.
December 06, 2014, 08:36:59 AM
#14
You have been around long enough to know what you were attempting was wrong, why you chose to PM the offer instead of making a thread. Jumping on the "Flawed Trust System" excuse is just as bad.

its the user who is wrong never the system correct?
its like a mirracle to find out how this trust system works and when we try get good intended use of it
(make real people positive ratings visible) we are evil?

a single guy can damage so much who didnt spend a minuted to research

and there is no way to counter that

where are the times when people did act friendly to each other?

why no one said to me "cryptonit the way u think it work is wrong"
and point me to the correct way it works

Quote
why no one said to me "cryptonit the way u think it work is wrong"
and point me to the correct way it works

Common sense?


Had you made a public thread asking for this then I could have seen this differently but you didn't.
Funny how you now rag on the same Trust system as "broken" and "unfair" that you tried to buy your way onto. People are funny that way.

I would suggest this:
Make a public thread, apologize for your mistake and once this is done, ask vod to reconsider.
Remember there are no guarantees he will but worth a shot.
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
December 06, 2014, 08:08:00 AM
#13
You have been around long enough to know what you were attempting was wrong, why you chose to PM the offer instead of making a thread. Jumping on the "Flawed Trust System" excuse is just as bad.

its the user who is wrong never the system correct?
its like a mirracle to find out how this trust system works and when we try get good intended use of it
(make real people positive ratings visible) we are evil?

a single guy can damage so much who didnt spend a minuted to research

and there is no way to counter that

where are the times when people did act friendly to each other?

why no one said to me "cryptonit the way u think it work is wrong"
and point me to the correct way it works
KWH
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1045
In Collateral I Trust.
December 06, 2014, 08:06:21 AM
#12
Are those accounts owned by him, or are they other developers ?

its all real users investors in DMD CLoudmining

it want even my idea to work on our trust rating
a comiunity member asked that people should give me a positive rating

and we did know nothing about this flawed trust system so we read and we found explaination

to be visible a guy with at least level2 on default trust list must have people on his own trusted list then their ratings are visible

and no im target of holly inquisition?


Claiming ignorance is no defense. You have been around long enough to know what you were attempting was wrong, why you chose to PM the offer instead of making a thread. Jumping on the "Flawed Trust System" excuse is just as bad.
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
December 06, 2014, 08:06:10 AM
#11
Quote
if i can give u anything for ur helping hand to make my positive rating visible just tell me mate

Requesting a mass add to the Default list along with the above message is seen as attempting to purchase an add to the Default Trust list. In short: Buying Trust. This will be given a negative every time and if you need an explanation of why, it only solidifies Vod's reasoning was sound.

i didnt want to pay him


i started the to ask him for a helping hand

which include study who i am who the people are who did gave a positive rating and if he think they are trustworthy add them to his trusted list


and i offered to give him a helping hand

nowhere i was meaning to pay him for blind approve positive rating

im non native english speaker if it was written in a way possible missunderstanding im sorry
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
December 06, 2014, 08:03:27 AM
#10
Are those accounts owned by him, or are they other developers ?

its all real users investors in DMD CLoudmining

it wasnt even my idea to work on our trust rating
a commiunity member asked that people should give me a positive rating

and we did know nothing about this flawed trust system so we read and we found explaination

to be visible a guy with at least level2 on default trust list must have people on his own trusted list then their ratings are visible

and now im target of holly inquisition?
KWH
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1045
In Collateral I Trust.
December 06, 2014, 07:40:38 AM
#9
Quote
if i can give u anything for ur helping hand to make my positive rating visible just tell me mate

Requesting a mass add to the Default list along with the above message is seen as attempting to purchase an add to the Default Trust list. In short: Buying Trust. This will be given a negative every time and if you need an explanation of why, it only solidifies Vod's reasoning was sound.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
December 06, 2014, 07:22:36 AM
#8
cryptonit trust level needs to be put right... hes not a scamer nor did he try to "buy" anyones trust score.. he is an honest guy and a very trustworthy person. PLEASE put this right or it will damage our coin and he has worked so hard to develop and promote it (aswell as the rest of the dev team) if u need some kind of evidence of who he is or how he works just go to https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-dmd-diamond-30-scarce-valuable-secure-pos-30-masternodes-65-580725      read all 229 pages of the forum and see for ur self
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
December 06, 2014, 07:05:45 AM
#7
Vod gave him negative trust for soliciting trust. The guy must wish he had never sent those PM. Way to go Vod!
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
December 06, 2014, 07:04:16 AM
#6
really this trust system is broken
people who make business with u and reward u positive trust are invisible
people who did never deal with u can make visible negative feedback


totally agree
it's not fair!
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
December 06, 2014, 06:54:49 AM
#5
really this trust system is broken
people who make business with u and reward u positive trust are invisible
people who did never deal with u can make visible negative feedback

i am close to the point leave BTT and move all comunication on our own forum

check the guy who gave me negative feedback
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=30747

if someone abuse the trust system than he
damaging a honorable community member he never exchanges a written or spoken word
he know nothing about me

BUT please none give him a negative rating please
thats not the way we deal with that

we seek for understanding that this time he was wrong

i request honourable members of BTT counter this wrong decision by check out my history
and give me a positive rating if u feel im a positive addition to the community
hero member
Activity: 774
Merit: 554
CEO Diamond Foundation
December 06, 2014, 06:39:04 AM
#4
Obvious scammer is obvious.
Do not do it.

And you obviously know nothing so please spare us your uneducated opinions.
hero member
Activity: 774
Merit: 554
CEO Diamond Foundation
December 06, 2014, 06:37:38 AM
#3
Hi DiamondCardz

first u have a great name  Huh

because im part of DMD Diamond Foundation  Grin

but the reason i contact u is i seek someone from trustlist level who add people who gave me a positiverating to his trusted list

this way they end on beeing used by default list and their rating for me is visible for default setting users

check my posts u will see im a serious longterm member

if u can help me please add

popshot
hallared
pokeytex
TheMightyKnight
chilo
Sampey
cryptonit
danbi
Historical

to ur trust list
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust

if i can give u anything for ur helping hand to make my positive rating visible just tell me mate

thx for ur help in advance

br

cryponit

btw check out my linkedin and twitter if u need more info
https://twitter.com/CryptonitDMD
https://www.linkedin.com/pub/helmut-siedl/92/460/586

That's...a tad bit suspicious. Asking me to add all the people who gave him positive trust to DefaultTrust (not that I really can anyway).

I beg to differ Sir.

That sort of quick accusation without even checking the motives is ridiculously irresponsible.

The Trust points cryptonit was given were never forced upon the people. Actually the proposal came form one of the users:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9706088

He's been also collectively voted for the Trusted Award by the exact people you accuse of ingenuity:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9645113
Cryptonit = Helmut Siedl (Diamond)

He's been providing highly work demanding financial service to many and naturally he deserved some recognition. The problem is the trust system on BTT is broken. Positive feedback points are invisible unless some selected users on this forum (like yourself) have other people added to their own trust list.
This is discriminatory as it lives power to people who suddenly become the judge and the executioner.

I'm sure the above listed people will question your decision in this thread.

I ask you to reverse this damaging decision which doesn't do good to anyone here.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
December 05, 2014, 08:37:21 PM
#2
You are on default trust, you can negative trust him for trying to solicit/buy trust
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1118
December 05, 2014, 07:56:46 PM
#1
Hi DiamondCardz

first u have a great name  Huh

because im part of DMD Diamond Foundation  Grin

but the reason i contact u is i seek someone from trustlist level who add people who gave me a positiverating to his trusted list

this way they end on beeing used by default list and their rating for me is visible for default setting users

check my posts u will see im a serious longterm member

if u can help me please add

popshot
hallared
pokeytex
TheMightyKnight
chilo
Sampey
cryptonit
danbi
Historical

to ur trust list
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust

if i can give u anything for ur helping hand to make my positive rating visible just tell me mate

thx for ur help in advance

br

cryponit

btw check out my linkedin and twitter if u need more info
https://twitter.com/CryptonitDMD
https://www.linkedin.com/pub/helmut-siedl/92/460/586

That's...a tad bit suspicious. Asking me to add all the people who gave him positive trust to DefaultTrust (not that I really can anyway).
Jump to: