Even if they locked or unlocked the tokens, it's still the platform and the community support that will have an impact on its the price in the market, if bounty hunters dump their share which is ok with me, but if it has potential, investors will easily pick it up.
Actually bounty hunters share is not much to be considered as dumping come from them,so the investors are the persons dumping their tokens so locking the bounty hunters token will cause the value of their rewards to be declined and next time they may failed to participate on the bounties again. 
Topic: Locking Bounty Rewards To Avoid Dumping - page 19. (Read 1979 times)
ICOs which lock their tokens in fear of bounty hunters dumping are not analyzing the market in the right way. Only bounty hunters are not pulling the price down, I remember late 2017 when I just started joining bounty campaigns, I sold many rewards early and price elevated after some days, it all depends upon the market sentiments. Locking bounty reward is not the solution to avoid dumping. I have also participated in an ICO which has locked their bounty rewards till Oct 2020 but still price of their token is decreasing like anything. I hope it will recover with market. People should stop blaming bounty hunters for price dumping.
I have always said this, it is not the hunters fault for dumping but even some hunters blame themselves for dump which is bad.
Anyways you are right to some extent but this is not always true. Some bounty hunters do not care about the worth of bounty reward. As long as they can get some few cash from it, they are okay, however there are still some but few bounty hunters who hodl. 
So there's this campaign that I've participated that locked bounty rewards in the hopes of avoiding token dumping. As what I expected, the dumping still happened. What's even funnier is that it is now the bounty hunters who complains unlike before where investors blame bounty hunters 
If there's any coins or tokens that should be locked, it should only be the team's share (or maybe add those given to advisors). Both parties (investors & hunters) have invested either money or time to get their share and they should not be subjected to such restriction.
Instead of locking, teams should just concentrate on other methods such as buy back and loyalty rewards to lessen the chances of price crash.
You know the issue of dumping is not only a problem to blame Bounty hunters many complicated factors may cause the dumping even the early sale participant that gather huge bonuses can also cause the dumping of coin/tokens that resulting to dump the token price. The real deal is if the token has its own purpose and true use case it will not dump unless it was a shitcoin. im a favor on quarterly distribution on Bounties if needed. If there's any coins or tokens that should be locked, it should only be the team's share (or maybe add those given to advisors). Both parties (investors & hunters) have invested either money or time to get their share and they should not be subjected to such restriction.
Instead of locking, teams should just concentrate on other methods such as buy back and loyalty rewards to lessen the chances of price crash.
Yeah you know almost all people think that bounty hunter is cause price down.
I can see why dev lock bounty pay because priority is an investor not a bounty hunter.
I can see why dev lock bounty pay because priority is an investor not a bounty hunter.
dump is not only bounty hunters fault, there are many investor dump it price so they can make profit fast as they can. and dont forget if team can decide where the price go. there are many token still have high volume because of team.
and then its not fair if bounty hunter token locked by team. investor get all they want and bounty hunter get trash at the end.
and then its not fair if bounty hunter token locked by team. investor get all they want and bounty hunter get trash at the end.
Of a truth, there's no point locking people's tokens this people worked for it and they should be paid for their time. You agreed to pay them why lock their tokens at the end of the day.
Even if they locked or unlocked the tokens, it's still the platform and the community support that will have an impact on its the price in the market, if bounty hunters dump their share which is ok with me, but if it has potential, investors will easily pick it up.
If locking the bounty hunters token is the only strategy that is being put in place, am sorry to say, it won't make any difference. A sustainable strategy should be put in place to avoid dumping of tokens by even the team, advisors.
The most effective way to stop coins or tokens from dumping in price is the 'buy back' move from the teams themselves ,locking won't actually give any coin or token stable price and can't stop it from dumpers either ,the ball is in the teams court,if dumping crash there token price its not the dumpers faults ,it depends entirely on the team
yes we should lock the gifts we get, and not immediately throw them away when distributed. indeed the current market situation is difficult to accept because the price is quite low so it is not as expected. but that doesn't mean we have to throw it away. if you have good potential it's better to keep holding it.
Instead of locking, teams should just concentrate on other methods such as buy back and loyalty rewards to lessen the chances of price crash.
And also consider the fact that the amount of tokens given to bounty hunters is very small compared to their share. Even if they dump, the price should not be significantly altered by these hunters. The truth is, they are just looking for an excuse for this price drop. If they have valuable product to begin with, there will be price increase instead of this price crash.
The team mostly holds bigger number of tokens than bounty hunters as a whole so it is just right to ask the team to lock their tokens for a certain time. Anyway, it is their project and it should be the team who should believe more on the project than anyone else.
So there's this campaign that I've participated that locked bounty rewards in the hopes of avoiding token dumping. As what I expected, the dumping still happened. What's even funnier is that it is now the bounty hunters who complains unlike before where investors blame bounty hunters
If there's any coins or tokens that should be locked, it should only be the team's share (or maybe add those given to advisors). Both parties (investors & hunters) have invested either money or time to get their share and they should not be subjected to such restriction.
Instead of locking, teams should just concentrate on other methods such as buy back and loyalty rewards to lessen the chances of price crash.
That is an unfair stuff to do, even the bounty participant has the right to sell their coins after their hard work promoting the project, but they should also need to be able to consider the time when they sell the reward coins that they get If there's any coins or tokens that should be locked, it should only be the team's share (or maybe add those given to advisors). Both parties (investors & hunters) have invested either money or time to get their share and they should not be subjected to such restriction.
Instead of locking, teams should just concentrate on other methods such as buy back and loyalty rewards to lessen the chances of price crash.
So there's this campaign that I've participated that locked bounty rewards in the hopes of avoiding token dumping. As what I expected, the dumping still happened. What's even funnier is that it is now the bounty hunters who complains unlike before where investors blame bounty hunters
If there's any coins or tokens that should be locked, it should only be the team's share (or maybe add those given to advisors). Both parties (investors & hunters) have invested either money or time to get their share and they should not be subjected to such restriction.
Instead of locking, teams should just concentrate on other methods such as buy back and loyalty rewards to lessen the chances of price crash.
Next time, let's have the name of the project/coin so that the community would know what it's dealing with. It's however important to note that locking coins down after release has never presented dumping. What it does is delay the dumping. People will always sell off for specific reasons and these reasons will always be reasonable to them. Notably, selling off or dumping is never a crime. Sometimes, it's the team that dumps. I have had a first hand experience of this and it was very annoying. If there's any coins or tokens that should be locked, it should only be the team's share (or maybe add those given to advisors). Both parties (investors & hunters) have invested either money or time to get their share and they should not be subjected to such restriction.
Instead of locking, teams should just concentrate on other methods such as buy back and loyalty rewards to lessen the chances of price crash.
Token for bounty only arround 3% - 5% from total supply token so i don't think hunter will make price dump. Price dump depending on the development and results of the work of the team in the project itself.
Locking Bounty Rewards To Avoid Dumping
There should be no need for that. If something like that is needed that means that bounty rewards were way to high and people got way to many tokens for free.
They should lock a certain percentage of a users holding for a given, investor or bounty participant, to avoid the excessive dumping.
I hope investors should stop pinning the blame on the bounty hunters for the dumping of their token. Only a small percentage of the total circulating supply is allocated to the bounty and majority of it are to the investors so it stands to reason that it wouldn't affect much the price if the hunters decide to sell.
I hope investors should stop pinning the blame on the bounty hunters for the dumping of their token. Only a small percentage of the total circulating supply is allocated to the bounty and majority of it are to the investors so it stands to reason that it wouldn't affect much the price if the hunters decide to sell.
Most projects seem to do this or do not delay distribution to avoid a dump. Indeed, most people blame the bounty hunter for a dump. That is actually true and neither is it wrong. Indeed, most bounty hunters sell their tokens from bounties at very cheap prices. Therefore dumps often occur.
So there's this campaign that I've participated that locked bounty rewards in the hopes of avoiding token dumping. As what I expected, the dumping still happened. What's even funnier is that it is now the bounty hunters who complains unlike before where investors blame bounty hunters
If there's any coins or tokens that should be locked, it should only be the team's share (or maybe add those given to advisors). Both parties (investors & hunters) have invested either money or time to get their share and they should not be subjected to such restriction.
Instead of locking, teams should just concentrate on other methods such as buy back and loyalty rewards to lessen the chances of price crash.
If there's any coins or tokens that should be locked, it should only be the team's share (or maybe add those given to advisors). Both parties (investors & hunters) have invested either money or time to get their share and they should not be subjected to such restriction.
Instead of locking, teams should just concentrate on other methods such as buy back and loyalty rewards to lessen the chances of price crash.
If a certain project is going that far in order to avoid possible dumping, that means the project is somehow weak. At least, that is how I look at it. If a certain project is confident enough of its product and how it is being promoted as well as the partnerships they have sealed, they should not be worrying too much on a very tiny fraction of their token supply. After all, not every bounty hunter is going to dump their coins. I, for one, always give enough time for projects to reach certain significant milestones and prove their worth. And then of course, if their coins has a promise to offer to investors by way of their products, by the time they hit the exchanges, instead of dumps there will be pumps.
Jump to: