He's so deep in his lies that the can no longer face that he's just another nob that happened to be at the right place and at the right time. I don't think his claim on the London High Court would have any bearings nor would it be something that the judges will look thoroughly given his reputation of being a liar and choosing not to directly address what was being asked of him when he was claiming to be Satoshi. The dude's just finding legal loopholes to further his claim, making it seem authentic and that's about it (the copyright bullshit he did in the US, for example).
He will never have the tangible and solid evidence of his claims. I'm hoping that he gets into more trouble and face jail time.
Topic: London High Court: Craig Wright to sue Bitcoin.org operator-publisher - page 2. (Read 333 times)
April 23, 2021, 12:12:09 PM
April 23, 2021, 11:43:22 AM
He is a clown. One of the worst person in the industry
April 23, 2021, 11:42:22 AM
He's likely looking to make money off as many people as possible. If he gets to be recognized as Nakamoto, the chain of events you've mentioned will probably start by him suing a lot of people who are public Bitcoin investors/devs/users for using "his" code, "his" logo, "his" project's name etc..
Besides the above, his BSV project would probably skyrocket and so he would make a sh*t ton of money off it. I really hope this doesn't happen and no judge ever rules him to be the legitimate creator of BTC. Otherwise, a lot of people would have so much headache to handle from a crappy sentence..
Besides the above, his BSV project would probably skyrocket and so he would make a sh*t ton of money off it. I really hope this doesn't happen and no judge ever rules him to be the legitimate creator of BTC. Otherwise, a lot of people would have so much headache to handle from a crappy sentence..
April 23, 2021, 11:36:10 AM
Attention seeking idiot. I doubt the court will acknowledge his wild claims without tangible proof to back his wild statements. Why do you guys even share stuff related to him in the first place?
This is exactly what he wants. People are talking about him(positive or negative) which is why we need to collectively ignore him. An attention craving fool is nothing without attention.
This is exactly what he wants. People are talking about him(positive or negative) which is why we need to collectively ignore him. An attention craving fool is nothing without attention.
April 23, 2021, 11:22:15 AM
I thought he had already lost a case claiming he is SN. Didn't he have to pay several $millions as a result? Is he making money over all his rubbish claims?
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
April 23, 2021, 10:56:11 AM
The almost universal consensus clearly is that he is NOT the inventor of Bitcoin so what are the real reasons that are driving Wright to these lengths?
The one and only reason is to seek attention.Quote
The signalling theory: He had the opportunity two take two different paths of proving he is him (satoshi). One path would have been to make that exact kind of proof. Make a signature from the first Bitcoin block. Put the signature out in public. Make a very simple 10 line blog post that anyone including can verify that it's him. Instead, he has taken this path where he wrote this big long blog post with 200 lines. It's so confusing that even said it's confusing and tried to show only to a few selected people where we are supposed to trust them.
So in general the signalling theory says, if you have a good way of proving something and a noisy way. And you chose the noisy way then that means you could not do the good way in the first place.
- VitalikSo in general the signalling theory says, if you have a good way of proving something and a noisy way. And you chose the noisy way then that means you could not do the good way in the first place.
Collected from : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qLI3VIHuKU
Not a fan of Vitalik but he makes perfect sense.
April 23, 2021, 10:10:32 AM
Cobra, the owner-operator of bitcoin.org domain is being sued in the London High Court by Craig Wright.
Wright (an Australian computer scientist) insists he is Satoshi Nakamoto and said the bitcoin.org domain is allowing his whitepaper to be downloaded without permission therefore it is copyright infringement.
It seems the only way Wright can win the case is if he can prove he is Satoshi Nakamoto. He said in the past he will provide evidence but never provided anything tangible.
If a judge declares Wright is Satoshi it will start a chain of events that nobody could have ever thought possible.
Lawyers for Cobra stated the bitcoin.org domain was not registered in the UK and claims Wright will make about the whitepaper will easily be proven to be false.
Wright lives in the UK so if he were to commence legal action it should be in the country he resides in or in his native country, he chose to do this in London. The question is "why" would he do it?
Wright successfully registered US copyright for the Bitcoin 0.1 in April 2019 and his spokesman claimed it was "the first government agency recognition of Craig Wright as Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin" but the United States Copyright Office issued their own statement with the following: "the Copyright Office does not investigate whether there is a provable connection between the claimant and the pseudonymous author."
The almost universal consensus clearly is that he is NOT the inventor of Bitcoin so what are the real reasons that are driving Wright to these lengths?
Jump to: