Topic: Long, slow slide - page 2. (Read 10274 times)
Come on, despair! I want your lovely, lovely low prices!
I'm buying back during this selloff... guess I'm not in too much dispair yet!
Have we hit Despair yet?
Despair doesn't usually feel like confusion. You'll know when it hits by that sinking feeling in your gut that any BTC you have are worthless (or you've lost all your money), or you think that putting money in is pointless, as it's 'all over'. That's despair
. Have we hit Despair yet?
No
Have we hit Despair yet?
Classic financial bubble pattern.
Bitcoin, last 6 months.
Any questions?
None of the recent big buys was announced in advance. They're simply waiting for enough bears to swim into the net before buying. Big orders are fake, actual buys comes out of nowhere. So don't read too much into the order book even if there's no dark pool (that we know of) at Empty Gox.
Yes, except the ones that really matter are dark pools, and we don't get to see them, and one of them at 10,000 BTC is enough to drive up the market price by 1.45 USD, as happened over the weekend.
Aside from that, you're spot on.
Yes, except there are no more darkpools on mtgox for weeks
In the past
two months: average price: $22 +/- $10 (~45%)
one month: average price: $15 +/- $2.5 (~17%)
I think a merchant would be wise to sell with a 25% volatility hedge premium.
two months: average price: $22 +/- $10 (~45%)
one month: average price: $15 +/- $2.5 (~17%)
I think a merchant would be wise to sell with a 25% volatility hedge premium.
Market depth, Mt. Gox.
There are far more sellers than buyers this week. The sell side keeps building up, but little new cash is coming in on the buy side.
Remember, it takes $100,000 a day in new cash to keep up with mining. If the supply of
Yes, except the ones that really matter are dark pools, and we don't get to see them, and one of them at 10,000 BTC is enough to drive up the market price by 1.45 USD, as happened over the weekend.
Aside from that, you're spot on.
Market depth, Mt. Gox.
There are far more sellers than buyers this week. The sell side keeps building up, but little new cash is coming in on the buy side.
Remember, it takes $100,000 a day in new cash to keep up with mining. If the supply of
After three weeks of slide and turmoil, we've now had two weeks of modest stability, at $13.50 +- 0.50.
We're now up to 3 weeks at $13.50 +- 0.50. Stability continues.
You could now price something in Bitcoins and not change the price very often.
Mt. Gox, last 5 weeks. (Again, starting after the Mt. Gox screwup.)
After three weeks of slide and turmoil, we've now had two weeks of modest stability, at $13.50 +- 0.50.
I think you'll have to adjust that ratio for Moore's law. I know we haven't had much in the way of cheaper computing hardware in the past year or so -- but sooner or later GPU companies will release faster products at the same or lower price points. They have to, not only to compete with each other but also with themselves.
My out of the butt estimates would be a 30% average annual computing power per dollar increase even over the past 4 years of GPU stagnation. The same $200 which bought me an 8800GT early in 2007 bought me about 4x the GPU power in the form of 2x5830s 4 years later.
edit: actually, I think it may have been late 2007 or early 2008 for the 8800GT. Which means closer to 3 years than 4 for that power/dollar increase, in fact.
My out of the butt estimates would be a 30% average annual computing power per dollar increase even over the past 4 years of GPU stagnation. The same $200 which bought me an 8800GT early in 2007 bought me about 4x the GPU power in the form of 2x5830s 4 years later.
edit: actually, I think it may have been late 2007 or early 2008 for the 8800GT. Which means closer to 3 years than 4 for that power/dollar increase, in fact.
Realistically, the price seems to have leveled out for now. It's roughly at mining cost; the mining forums indicate that running existing mining hardware is worthwhile, but buying new hardware is not.
Mining cost alone isn't enough to determine the price, but it does seem to have an effect.
Now that we've had a few weeks of reasonable stability, Bitcoin has more potential as a currency.
Mining cost alone isn't enough to determine the price, but it does seem to have an effect.
Now that we've had a few weeks of reasonable stability, Bitcoin has more potential as a currency.
I know that the going trend is to state that mining has nothing to do with the price of bitcoins, however, I agree with you that I think mining cost has something to do with the price of bitcoins, probably more then most people think.
have you noticed that if you say anything on the forum about price of bitcoins and mining people will get all crazy like "Bitcoin price and mining has nothing to do with the price, you moron".
What you're describing is a "tangled hierarchy" and it is, in fact, the state of every economic system. Mining has an impact on bitcoin price and bitcoin price has an impact on mining. Many things have an impact on price, and many of those things are more substantial than mining activity - likewise price is not the only impact on mining, though price->mining is a stronger effect than mining-> price.
Among other things, miners produce some 7200 new coins per day - in times of low market movement the influx of new fiat moneys can be less than the face value of the 7200 new coins, and in such markets price tends to decline. This is just one of the many recognizable effects and it is admittedly a minor one that occurs only under limited circumstances.
Anyone who claims that they have the whole of the market "figured out" is either a fool or a liar. There are too many causes and effects and too many unknown ways in which the causes and effects interact, stack, tangle and loop back on themselves. The best we can do is look for indicators of mass market psychology and make educated guesses. Welcome to the wonderful world of economic theory
Well-said. It was so often repeated that price drives difficulty, "not the other way around". I've always argued that the relationship is "two-way causality". Note that since the crash from $30, difficulty hasn't dropped. To the contrary, difficulty is still growing slowly but steadily, and seems on target to rise to between 1.8 and 1.9 million for the next re-adjustment.
By saying two-way causality I mean that price drives difficulty, AND the other way around: difficulty drives price. To be precise, the evidence shows (see charts in my sig) that difficulty sets a bottom for the price. I don't think its coincidence that the price to difficulty ratio has only gone as low as about 0.75 (using a weighted average price), twice for the two bear markets of bitcoin's history. The first time was after price topped at $1.10 and fell from there, through March and early April. And the second time is now, which is where it has been since the crash from $30.
If the the price to difficulty ratio continues hovering between 0.75 and 1 (until the coming rally
), I think it makes for a pretty reliable economic indicator of the mass-market psychology of bitcoin. 
Moron 
have you noticed that if you say anything on the forum about price of bitcoins and mining people will get all crazy like "Bitcoin price and mining has nothing to do with the price, you moron".
When prices are volatile, I tend to stay up late trading until I can buy in low, until then I get hungry and raid the fridge. I have recently noticed an inverse relationship between the quantity of munchies in my apartment and bitcoin volatility and a less extreme inverse correlation with trend direction. I am now on a starvation diet and expect the market to respond. If anyone calls me a moron, I'll consider that a reinforcing signal.
Realistically, the price seems to have leveled out for now. It's roughly at mining cost; the mining forums indicate that running existing mining hardware is worthwhile, but buying new hardware is not.
Mining cost alone isn't enough to determine the price, but it does seem to have an effect.
Now that we've had a few weeks of reasonable stability, Bitcoin has more potential as a currency.
Mining cost alone isn't enough to determine the price, but it does seem to have an effect.
Now that we've had a few weeks of reasonable stability, Bitcoin has more potential as a currency.
I know that the going trend is to state that mining has nothing to do with the price of bitcoins, however, I agree with you that I think mining cost has something to do with the price of bitcoins, probably more then most people think.
have you noticed that if you say anything on the forum about price of bitcoins and mining people will get all crazy like "Bitcoin price and mining has nothing to do with the price, you moron".
What you're describing is a "tangled hierarchy" and it is, in fact, the state of every economic system. Mining has an impact on bitcoin price and bitcoin price has an impact on mining. Many things have an impact on price, and many of those things are more substantial than mining activity - likewise price is not the only impact on mining, though price->mining is a stronger effect than mining-> price.
Among other things, miners produce some 7200 new coins per day - in times of low market movement the influx of new fiat moneys can be less than the face value of the 7200 new coins, and in such markets price tends to decline. This is just one of the many recognizable effects and it is admittedly a minor one that occurs only under limited circumstances.
Anyone who claims that they have the whole of the market "figured out" is either a fool or a liar. There are too many causes and effects and too many unknown ways in which the causes and effects interact, stack, tangle and loop back on themselves. The best we can do is look for indicators of mass market psychology and make educated guesses. Welcome to the wonderful world of economic theory
Realistically, the price seems to have leveled out for now. It's roughly at mining cost; the mining forums indicate that running existing mining hardware is worthwhile, but buying new hardware is not.
Mining cost alone isn't enough to determine the price, but it does seem to have an effect.
Now that we've had a few weeks of reasonable stability, Bitcoin has more potential as a currency.
Mining cost alone isn't enough to determine the price, but it does seem to have an effect.
Now that we've had a few weeks of reasonable stability, Bitcoin has more potential as a currency.
I know that the going trend is to state that mining has nothing to do with the price of bitcoins, however, I agree with you that I think mining cost has something to do with the price of bitcoins, probably more then most people think.
have you noticed that if you say anything on the forum about price of bitcoins and mining people will get all crazy like "Bitcoin price and mining has nothing to do with the price, you moron".
Realistically, the price seems to have leveled out for now. It's roughly at mining cost; the mining forums indicate that running existing mining hardware is worthwhile, but buying new hardware is not.
Mining cost alone isn't enough to determine the price, but it does seem to have an effect.
Now that we've had a few weeks of reasonable stability, Bitcoin has more potential as a currency.
Mining cost alone isn't enough to determine the price, but it does seem to have an effect.
Now that we've had a few weeks of reasonable stability, Bitcoin has more potential as a currency.
Jump to: