Topic: look at not my hologram thats a rough mockup of what I expect the final version (Read 481 times)

I'm going to see if I can make this right for you- not because you're posting about me on the forum, but because I should have followed this up for you. But remember we actually need to communicate, I don't operate in a vacuum.

thanks, wish you would have told me this in july 2016, or july 2017,

hi all! I can confirm I did this as a layout- I didn't pay for the stock images because this was a layout (undecided), when layouts have been agreed upon I usually either pay for the images or make an entirely original image to replace it.

So yeah it looks like trash, which I touched up to look slightly less trashy (lol)- plenty of my clients will confirm I send them a lot of rough content when trying to come up with a layout for a design they are happy with.

I can also confirm that since killyou72 has decided to share my DMs (and layout) publicly without my permission that I will not be proceeding with the design edit:let's see if we can wrap this up amicably, I'll admit to not really caring about the layout image sharing, the DMs is just a little rich for me.
He is welcome to keep the layout for someone else to finish the design. While I don't explicitly sign off all my DMs with people expecting them not to post them, I never share them in posts myself and I do expect a modicum of reciprocal respect when it comes to the privacy of direct messages, as do most here I expect.

The truth is I was very busy for all sorts of reasons and didn't get round to his design as fast as I should have- my bad, I admit that was shitty of me and I screwed up. I did apologise to him for this and wanted to move forward. But frankly I'm not interested in justifying myself any further than this post. I think I've answered concerns and questions here. Though I also think the quoted DM is pretty clear too.
I can also understand with killyou wanting to move forward fast and show people for his coin, because we didn't get this started quick enough, but it was just too premature to do out of context and no where near finished.

tldr: I sometimes use copypasted watermarked images for layout before either removing or paying for them + I don't like people sharing my DMs publicly.

Y'all can flame me for using stock images to help with layout and subsequently paying for them in some designs if you like now

cheers

edit: underline

It only took a year or so for me to have a concept for a hologram.

What's wrong with what i said

"Only took a year or so, but that is the hologram"

So.. Dissecting someones english or not, you have not done a single right move with this one.

Not anymore!   

I also wanted to point out I don't believe the layout was truly insulted, more like it got pretty good reception although now this has been revealed some people are wondering what was actually originally artistically created for this project.

Sorry, I didnt expect someone to come and dissect my english.

What I meant was, look at not my hologram thats a rough mockup of what I expect the final version to look like

I have a hard time believing BTS would have mashed up this stock image with the below wave graphics that look like they were done in paint.  I don't mind subscribing to your story if bigtimespaghetti was to confirm he did the work.  


(https://i.imgur.com/hv3B3Szl.png)

I have paid for stock graphics before and when that happens the graphic designer doesn't go out of his way to photoshop (https://i.imgur.com/ehgRWdx.png) the watermarks out of the image, the watermarks are already removed.

Title reads..  Sneak peak at My hologram.. chearly you have taken ownership of said work?

I am not too sure what you mean exactly, but bigtimespaghetti designed the hologram and when I PMed them about it being plagiarised I got this response

" plagiarised? no. I used a stock image... for the layout and not a finished hologram, a layout is like a concept, a step up from the rough sketch I did before, it's no where near finished, I'd never consider giving someone a layout image as finished. I'm trying to get feedback on the right direction of the image.

I sometimes use stock art in holograms or designs (which I pay for myself). You always have the option of the other more detailed stock image. Use of stock images in designs is very common. It's kind of funny that in that message it suggests I was trying to scam you with a watermarked image, trust me I'm not quite that dumb. Plus when it's on a hologram, with all the extra detail, it will look fine.

It's cool you're discussing the design with other people, but I'm confused why you're sending me messages with people insulting the layout without understanding what it is. A layout can be iterated and changed- that's essentially what it's for, so we don't get something you're unhappy with when the design is actually complete. "

Alright, if they are reputable I'm sure they wouldn't mind attaching their name to it.  Who designed the original, watermarked image sold on 123RF?

I cannot give you an answer to that, besides the fact that I have a very reputable fourm member here designing it.

This has just come to my attention, may I ask why the hologram image is watermarked with Dreamstime and 123RF logos?

Both are very nice, Pirates FTW!

I had the idea before his coin was launched. He just beat me too it

No, just curious. I recently had a conference call with a hologram manufacturer and he made mention that the less displacement between shading transitions is undesirable and didn’t recommend holos smaller than 1”. But we’re only talking the difference of of few mm’s.

You don't think the pirate thing is a bit played out and childish at this point?  Maybe add a dinosaur too while you are at it.

that would take away from the whole pirate theme!!!

The theme is pirates!

One suggestion, I know kids love pirate ships, but perhaps use a sailboat that is not from the 1800's but more modern.  After all this is bitcoin, not gold dubloons.

Edit to add, S/Y 'Maltese Falcon' would work:  https://imgur.com/qlkjko3