I am seriously about forking another branch of bitcoin, but no code only comments.
The fork will be called bitcoinComment.
Topic: looked at bitcoind source and looks like a shitcode - page 3. (Read 911 times)
Well, it was basically an experiment that got superhit,.. the later batches of it should had been properly coded buy yes, first attempt is never good for a new person to read the code..
If you think it's that bad why don't you contribute to tidy it up? It's an open source project and everyone is welcome to add their expertise.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin
Truth be told i am a fun of bitcoin and other crypto technology but utterly disappointed by the quality of code.
There was not even single line of documentation all of the few files I peeked through. In several of the technology companies I worked, code without proper comments along header was considered to be a garbage and not worth a single cent. There are lot of philosophy behind making a good coding practice which I can not start over here, it is even taught in CS101.
There was not even single line of documentation all of the few files I peeked through. In several of the technology companies I worked, code without proper comments along header was considered to be a garbage and not worth a single cent. There are lot of philosophy behind making a good coding practice which I can not start over here, it is even taught in CS101.
Jump to: