I agree with this 100%. A coin maker who is still active selling coins that let's his coins become paper weights says something when other makers release the public address lists. Then I have other collectors say they use to get addys from him a few years back for a few bits. But now he won't respond on ly ignore and let the coins become useless. How people get the coins is besides the point. In this case it didn't come with it so I was trying to see if I could obtain it. But as I ask around, I hear more and more people say the same thing.That smoothie has just abandoned his old coins and customers and that this is a very common issue among this community with lealana coins. But is still here selling coins. So I figured someone has to say something. Because alot of people are just licking boots. So I figured I would speak up. It's not cool. I'm sure people will have their opinions but I'm just speaking my mind and it's not right he would treat the collectors and his coins like this. It's sad really. I'm not being hostile but just calling it like I see it. I'm saying what alot of people are thinking. Trust me this isn't just about my coin. Because at this point I really don't even care about it anymore.
Ok, so I'm not here to piss on anything or anyone, just try and shed some light on forum history here:
I understand this frustration, but you have to remember that smoothie has always stated he will never give the addresses out except to original buyers.
This is the privacy-centricness in him, which may have/probably led to (?) the Monero coins early in XMR history, as that is where I first actually interacted with him, the XMR development thread back when XMR first spun-up etc.
Also, have you ever read his websites TOS/TAC? (Warning SSL expired, or was never put in place, this site is very old:
http://lealana.com/tac.php )
So yeah. I've been here almost ten years, and this was always a well known "thing" in his early auctions I was lucky enough to even watch lol.
Sorry, I know that's a shitty reply, but it is what it is. You can't make someone do something when they have zero legal obligation to do so, nor personal.
As far as the BF vs. Non-BF thing, I'm not going there right now, most people know my opinion on that as well.
Thanks,
Owl