ok, rucoin closed.
bye bye rucoin
H4sIAF1aEFEAAwsoTcrJTFbIyy/JTE61UgjJyCxWKMgvLlEA0iVF+Tk5aampKXpcANrrPAcnAAAA
bye bye rucoin
H4sIAF1aEFEAAwsoTcrJTFbIyy/JTE61UgjJyCxWKMgvLlEA0iVF+Tk5aampKXpcANrrPAcnAAAA
LOL proof?
E.T.A
?? 
Topic: Looking to Commission luke-jr to "kill" RuCoin - page 3. (Read 6919 times)
LOL proof?
E.T.A
?? 
ok, rucoin closed.
bye bye rucoin
H4sIAF1aEFEAAwsoTcrJTFbIyy/JTE61UgjJyCxWKMgvLlEA0iVF+Tk5aampKXpcANrrPAcnAAAA
bye bye rucoin
H4sIAF1aEFEAAwsoTcrJTFbIyy/JTE61UgjJyCxWKMgvLlEA0iVF+Tk5aampKXpcANrrPAcnAAAA
LOL proof?
ok, rucoin closed.
bye bye rucoin
H4sIAF1aEFEAAwsoTcrJTFbIyy/JTE61UgjJyCxWKMgvLlEA0iVF+Tk5aampKXpcANrrPAcnAAAA
bye bye rucoin
H4sIAF1aEFEAAwsoTcrJTFbIyy/JTE61UgjJyCxWKMgvLlEA0iVF+Tk5aampKXpcANrrPAcnAAAA
LOL proof?
ok, rucoin closed.
bye bye rucoin
H4sIAF1aEFEAAwsoTcrJTFbIyy/JTE61UgjJyCxWKMgvLlEA0iVF+Tk5aampKXpcANrrPAcnAAAA
bye bye rucoin
H4sIAF1aEFEAAwsoTcrJTFbIyy/JTE61UgjJyCxWKMgvLlEA0iVF+Tk5aampKXpcANrrPAcnAAAA
That's the best I can provide at the moment. I am working on getting the current stuff.
Some people on this forum are just a joke...
Entertainment value
That's the best I can provide at the moment. I am working on getting the current stuff.
Java code is completely open sourced...
Is it...? LOL, bad example, my fault... Sorry, not a software developer... LOL...
Obviously you are just a guy who runs his mouth about things he doesnt understand nor has the proof to provide about his claims.
That's a super old version that doesn't even include scrypt.c which the authors (who?) or at least the only RUcoin pool claim the chain now uses
That's the best I can provide at the moment. I am working on getting the current stuff.
1. Talk a lot and make claims
2. get asked questions about source code to prove your claims
3. then scramble to find proof. Nice. lol
You remind me of Realsolid...lol
Java code is completely open sourced...
Is it...? LOL, bad example, my fault... Sorry, not a software developer... LOL...
Hey dumbass,
Provide the source code that proves 51% immunity for RUC and I will shut up.
That is if the code is reviewed by myself and the community and the consensus is that RUC is in fact immune to such attacks.
Otherwise STFU.
Provide the source code that proves 51% immunity for RUC and I will shut up.
That is if the code is reviewed by myself and the community and the consensus is that RUC is in fact immune to such attacks.
Otherwise STFU.
This the best I've got. It's not entirely current and I'm not a software developer so i have no idea if the defense code stuff is in there. Have fun: http://www.sendspace.com/file/6asx7l
Okay so then STFU and stop making claims you have no proof of given you haven't tested it yourself for the 51% attack immunity claim.
The network has been tested naturally by someone else holding 51%. Also, this is why I'd like luke-jr to test it, so it can then be "officially" called "tested"
backpedal more. You put up quite a show on btc-e claiming that RUC is immune to 51% attacks and that it uses a method of dual hashing algs. Yet you have no proof and haven't even seen the code that does it.
This just goes to show that you only parroted what someone told you was "TRUTH" when in fact there is no evidence.
The evidence is that I have seen the network in defense mode with my own eyes when someone else was holding majority hashpower. Don't twist things around to attempt to discredit me. You've never seen the source code for Java, Flash, Windows, or Norton A/V but I promise you, they work (most of the time).
Now calm down and wait for some solid results one way or the other before you talk shit.
Regardless of whatever the truth is, and regardless of who is right and wrong there's no need for you to be an asshole about it.
Why is there nobody left who can simply debate a thing without having to troll and be an asshole about it too...?
You are comparing established corporations that have many developers working on the product that has been tested on many users' computers.
RUC has like maybe 1 dev and 10 users who tested the new source.
Plus if the new source exists, why isnt it publicly available?
NO twisting here. Just facts. You claimed something to be true yet you don't even know where the source code is. The code you sent looks to be outdated.
Right again we go with the "if you dont agree with me you are a TROLL". Dude I asked for the source and you went silent for over a day.
You claimed that it has THIS and THAT but no PROOF! Hard evidence that it works. HAve you tested it for those types of scenarios and have data to prove it? If not, then you need to take a step back and let the adults verify if RUC is the real deal or if you are just full of shit.
Okay? Thanks and have a nice day!
Smoothie
Java code is completely open sourced...
Hey dumbass,
Provide the source code that proves 51% immunity for RUC and I will shut up.
That is if the code is reviewed by myself and the community and the consensus is that RUC is in fact immune to such attacks.
Otherwise STFU.
Provide the source code that proves 51% immunity for RUC and I will shut up.
That is if the code is reviewed by myself and the community and the consensus is that RUC is in fact immune to such attacks.
Otherwise STFU.
This the best I've got. It's not entirely current and I'm not a software developer so i have no idea if the defense code stuff is in there. Have fun: http://www.sendspace.com/file/6asx7l
Okay so then STFU and stop making claims you have no proof of given you haven't tested it yourself for the 51% attack immunity claim.
The network has been tested naturally by someone else holding 51%. Also, this is why I'd like luke-jr to test it, so it can then be "officially" called "tested"
backpedal more. You put up quite a show on btc-e claiming that RUC is immune to 51% attacks and that it uses a method of dual hashing algs. Yet you have no proof and haven't even seen the code that does it.
This just goes to show that you only parroted what someone told you was "TRUTH" when in fact there is no evidence.
The evidence is that I have seen the network in defense mode with my own eyes when someone else was holding majority hashpower. Don't twist things around to attempt to discredit me. You've never seen the source code for Java, Flash, Windows, or Norton A/V but I promise you, they work (most of the time).
Now calm down and wait for some solid results one way or the other before you talk shit.
Regardless of whatever the truth is, and regardless of who is right and wrong there's no need for you to be an asshole about it.
Why is there nobody left who can simply debate a thing without having to troll and be an asshole about it too...?
Hey dumbass,
Provide the source code that proves 51% immunity for RUC and I will shut up.
That is if the code is reviewed by myself and the community and the consensus is that RUC is in fact immune to such attacks.
Otherwise STFU.
Provide the source code that proves 51% immunity for RUC and I will shut up.
That is if the code is reviewed by myself and the community and the consensus is that RUC is in fact immune to such attacks.
Otherwise STFU.
This the best I've got. It's not entirely current and I'm not a software developer so i have no idea if the defense code stuff is in there. Have fun: http://www.sendspace.com/file/6asx7l
Okay so then STFU and stop making claims you have no proof of given you haven't tested it yourself for the 51% attack immunity claim.
The network has been tested naturally by someone else holding 51%. Also, this is why I'd like luke-jr to test it, so it can then be "officially" called "tested"
backpedal more. You put up quite a show on btc-e claiming that RUC is immune to 51% attacks and that it uses a method of dual hashing algs. Yet you have no proof and haven't even seen the code that does it.
This just goes to show that you only parroted what someone told you was "TRUTH" when in fact there is no evidence.
'Immune' is a strong word. 'More tricky' is likely.
I cannot say for sure as no details are released of the design.
But just from a reasonable design point of view, ppcoin also runs with 2 separate difficulties. So I could just provide my opinion on a design with two separate hashes and difficulties. If designed properly, you can make 51% attack difficult if attackers only compute one of the two hashes. But if attackers have the resource to compute both hashes in good scale then all bets are off.
I cannot say for sure as no details are released of the design.
But just from a reasonable design point of view, ppcoin also runs with 2 separate difficulties. So I could just provide my opinion on a design with two separate hashes and difficulties. If designed properly, you can make 51% attack difficult if attackers only compute one of the two hashes. But if attackers have the resource to compute both hashes in good scale then all bets are off.
Well, there's really only one way to be sure. Maybe we should commission two miners, one doing sha256d, one doing scrypt, both pointing at the same client to see if they can successfully double-spend while >51% attacking the chain. I would really like to see it.
'Immune' is a strong word. 'More tricky' is likely.
I cannot say for sure as no details are released of the design.
But just from a reasonable design point of view, ppcoin also runs with 2 separate difficulties. So I could just provide my opinion on a design with two separate hashes and difficulties. If designed properly, you can make 51% attack difficult if attackers only compute one of the two hashes. But if attackers have the resource to compute both hashes in good scale then all bets are off.
I cannot say for sure as no details are released of the design.
But just from a reasonable design point of view, ppcoin also runs with 2 separate difficulties. So I could just provide my opinion on a design with two separate hashes and difficulties. If designed properly, you can make 51% attack difficult if attackers only compute one of the two hashes. But if attackers have the resource to compute both hashes in good scale then all bets are off.
Hey dumbass,
Provide the source code that proves 51% immunity for RUC and I will shut up.
That is if the code is reviewed by myself and the community and the consensus is that RUC is in fact immune to such attacks.
Otherwise STFU.
Provide the source code that proves 51% immunity for RUC and I will shut up.
That is if the code is reviewed by myself and the community and the consensus is that RUC is in fact immune to such attacks.
Otherwise STFU.
This the best I've got. It's not entirely current and I'm not a software developer so i have no idea if the defense code stuff is in there. Have fun: http://www.sendspace.com/file/6asx7l
Okay so then STFU and stop making claims you have no proof of given you haven't tested it yourself for the 51% attack immunity claim.
The network has been tested naturally by someone else holding 51%. Also, this is why I'd like luke-jr to test it, so it can then be "officially" called "tested"
Hey dumbass,
Provide the source code that proves 51% immunity for RUC and I will shut up.
That is if the code is reviewed by myself and the community and the consensus is that RUC is in fact immune to such attacks.
Otherwise STFU.
Provide the source code that proves 51% immunity for RUC and I will shut up.
That is if the code is reviewed by myself and the community and the consensus is that RUC is in fact immune to such attacks.
Otherwise STFU.
This the best I've got. It's not entirely current and I'm not a software developer so i have no idea if the defense code stuff is in there. Have fun: http://www.sendspace.com/file/6asx7l
Okay so then STFU and stop making claims you have no proof of given you haven't tested it yourself for the 51% attack immunity claim.
That's a super old version that doesn't even include scrypt.c which the authors (who?) or at least the only RUcoin pool claim the chain now uses
That's the best I can provide at the moment. I am working on getting the current stuff.
How are you going to pay someone to run these tests when you haven't even got the funds to pay back tiny loans you took out months ago?
What part of "I am making this thread ...and to find people interested in donating to the total cost of having the chain tested." did you NOT understand...? Just curious...
This the best I've got. It's not entirely current and I'm not a software developer so i have no idea if the defense code stuff is in there. Have fun: http://www.sendspace.com/file/6asx7l
That's a super old version that doesn't even include scrypt.c which the authors (who?) or at least the only RUcoin pool claim the chain now uses
Jump to: