Topic: Low life Lauda give me negative trust without reason (Read 2253 times)

Lauda, as you don't answering me in PM, I ask you here.
Please delete negative trust for me. I don't seen any you warnings. I don't support and never used Alttrade signature.

LAUDA when you punish people for speaking opinions that you do not agree with you are doing what the Bolsheviks did!  This goes against all that bitcoin stood for.  


That user simply reviewed the situation with me and saw I was being targeted by you for extermination for speaking my mind and not doing anything else wrong and he acted accordingly.  You are an unchecked tyrant of these forums.  And are acting like a troll

LAUDA omg so he is lying about being scared.  You are gone, gone, gone.  Is there enough oxygen on your planet?

For review being scared is a feeling.  feelings cannot be lies.  please learn more.

That is an outright lie. People do not get neg. rated for that. Stop using shills and doing shady stuff, and you won't get neg. rated.

I have not, and this is a very pathetic attempt at freeing all the tagged accounts. It is futile as it has no valid arguments behind it. However, I shall not forget it.

That is also a lie.

Another lie, and then you wonder why you get tagged

---

Any rating on Bcash shills that claim Bcash is Bitcoin is valid as per theymoses statement (not that it was necessary as that one was obvious). Anything else mr. shill?

I am not some jerk off.  Not involved in campaigns, spam or anything like that.

  This forum just bottomed out IMO.  No honor.  This is what happens when low quality money or logic takes hold instead of goods and services you get bads and services.  More race to the bottom logic from bottom feeders.  This forum was lucky to have such honorable people here so I respect policing our own as a viable practice like small towns sometimes do.  But at the end of the day the forum policies are being ignored when it comes to LAUDA and there is not court system here to act as an immune system to protect the rights of any users targeted by LAUDA for simply disagreeing with her opinion.  Further she appears to take joy after her victim gets upset.  This is a red flag btw.

The whole reason the King was considered a bad style of government was because his OPINION could be enforced upon others.  And if the King was correct that is ok but WHEN the King is wrong it is the worst thing ever for the people that suffer as a result.  I am not a paid football player on the job trying to take down a nation by attacking its; symbols or anything (and even if I was I would still be allowed to protest in the USA lol) I am trying to post in the correct thread in a chat forum for what I believe (for really good f'ing reasons) to be correct information.

I am willing to take a polygraph and brain fingerprint to prove that I am not lying not shilling but actually here because I am unbanked and alone in the world except for bitcoin.  And now that I see what has happened to bitcoin I need to fight to save it from the bankster seg wit takeover because bitcoin as originally intended is the last chance for people on earth to balance the political powers over them.  The full potential has barely been scratched.  btc is now an altcoin I am afraid and yes this is my opinion based on research.  However one thing is for sure I will never trust the people who have hobbled bitcoin even if they fix it overnight.  They had 3 years.  The original problem was arbitrarily imposed using fear on Satoshi and promised to be fixed later and they never did.

blazed and hilariousandco

Exactly. SMAS is only a point of reference for signature campaign managers to find potentially spammers that are trying to join their campaigns. So refer to it strictly, others do not. As The Pharmicist said Edwardard doesn't use it, and i don't think Darkstar uses it either.

@pleasedontnegme Your claim of SMAS bans handed out as personal vendettas doesn't make sense. Campaign managers usually do not interact with particpants much, only on campaign related subjects usually. How is this so called personal vendetta is even generated?

I've done that myself, and will continue to do so.  People who sell accounts are cancerous to bitcointalk, as are those who buy them.  What good do you think comes of account dealing?  It's either to spam for sig campaigns or to commit a scam using a trust score that isn't theirs.  It's so bad here, you can't tell who's who.  Dealing with a green-trusted member?  How do you know it's the person who actually earned that trust?  Ans:  You don't.

The SMAS thing is a private matter amongst the campaign managers.  They have every right to add people to that as they see fit, and campaign managers don't have to use the list anyway.  I don't think Edwardard uses it, for example.  I've seen some people who got blacklisted who weren't the most egregious shitposters, but it's not my call to criticize that.  That's not a bitcointalk thing, it's a private consortium kind of thing.  There are probably hundreds of users who deserve to be on that list who aren't.  People are human and aren't efficient engines of shitpost destruction.

I'd like to comment on this situation (from my main account). But I'm scared that Lauda will neg trust me for it like he does to anyone else that speaks out against him. I suspect I’m not the only one with those fears, and it’s not worth having my account ruined.

For example, he just neg trusted someone for "lying" about him buying forum accounts, when the referenced screenshots prove that he did exactly that. It seems like Lauda is using Default Trust to suppress opinions he doesn't want to be seen.

Lauda neg trusts people just for offering to buy or sell an account, which seems totally disproportionate, given that he has engaged in these practices himself. (“How much for 10 accounts?”)

All you need to do is express opinions Lauda disagrees with to get default negative trust now. This user even states opinions as “I think…” and “I think…” but Lauda claims these specific opinions are “lies” to justify tagging him with default negative trust. And if you accuse him of shady behavior, it's guaranteed, regardless of your actual trading history or character.

Some of the people added to SMAS are clearly not spammers, either. There are personal vendettas at play, and provably so. Which leads me to ask…

Who on DT1 has Lauda on their trust list? Is there a way to determine this? I'd love to have a conversation with this person if they promise to maintain my privacy.

At some point, you can't just accuse us all of being Quickseller alts....

 You have now shown you r threat to me here for the world to see.  You have no right to stop me from speaking about the true bitcoin that satoshi gave the world.

Many others have looked at the issue and eventually they agree that bitcoin cash is the embodiment of what bitcoin is.  Your opinions are not fact and my opinions are not fact.  They are opinions.

And what you just admitted and proved you did was to use your power here to enforce your opinion over on another.  This is called aribrary and capricious.  You arfe scumb to do this.  How is it that you do not understand the difference between opinion and fact?

Eventually the world will see over time that my opinion is more accurate than yours.  And you what then?  Well you would be wrong.

Fact: you were posting in the wrong thread.  That thread is for bch aka bitcoin cash.

fact:  you put a negative feedback on my account after threatening me to stop speaking in support of bitcoin cash!

Do you deny the above two facts?

No you do not you have already admitted.  This makes you anti free speech.  This means you think you opinions are to be enforced on those who do not share them.

And you have put a mark on my good name when I am not the scammer or liar.

The fact is you did these things and in my negative feedback you say you did not.

guess what LAUDA?  that actually makes you the liar.  

The fact is that I happen to have studied money systems longer than bitcoins existed.

I have also been unbanked longer than bitcoins existed.  Do you think I did this for fun.  I did it because I am offended by lies.  Even tiny ones.  Do you honestly think I lied here?  If yes you are rock stupid.  I could easily have a comfortable life if I just lied a little bit in my life to have all the things you do from society.  Instead I have been living a very rough life just because I wish to avoid even the smallest lie.

It is 100% laughable that you think I lied.  Do you even know that with an opinion there is no wrong answer.  It is an opinion.  Someone can be wrong.  So yes maybe I am wrong or maybe your are wrong.  But being wrong is not the same as a lie.  

I cannot believe I need to explain to you what a lie is.  You are making me physically sick with you accusations.

Will you provide your name and address so i can serve papers on you?  I would like to have a more trusted and fair forum to continue this discussion... like a court room with a judge and record.  Please let me know if you have the confidence in your words to meet me in court.  If you really think I am a liar you should have no problem proving it since you have the evidence obviously LOL.

My opinion is the bitcoin cash is the real bitcoin and not just my opinion.  And my onions are very informed.  And amongst the research community I am highly prized for my accuracy.

You are out of your league on this one troll.

either post proof that opinions can be lies or remove my negative feedback.  I will remove mine after you remove yours.  Thanks

That is factually a lie. People who maliciously lie in order to deceive newbies are people who can't be trusted. People who can't be trusted are people who get negative ratings. QED.

You are a chronic liar that can't be trusted. I have said no such thing, nor threatened you, nor responded to you in that post.


That is another lie. A lot of shills got tagged over the years.

---

Now go back to that degenerate bitcoin.com forum and the con men Ver. This place does not need bamboozled liars.

I am not reselling my account.

In fact I am 100% unbanked since 2004 for moral reasons.

I need and use bitcoin to live my life.

Recently I found great sadness at the news of a hard fork Aug. 1st.

However after learning the deeper issues of both sides I have decided that bitcoin cash is the coin that follows the touring complete model as set by that unknown genius in 2008.



     So I began posting support for the coin in the bch thread.   LAUDA comes over to this thread with FUD and threatens me (see post #9313 or see her feedback in her trust rating from me)  and she states publically that if I do not stop posting in support of bch in the bch thread that I will get negative trust from her.

As a former civil rights investigator and history lover, legal researcher and American this is some of the most offensive behaviors I can imagine.

I think she is anti trump and serving her political agenda.  I think this because no one else in the thread got negative feedback from her!

She said I am a liar and yet I have not seen any proof of any lie from me.  She says I posted fake propaganda yet I have no prrof of anything I have said is fake.  Furthermore.  as a former researcher I am very much trained to not ever say anything even in casual conversation that cannot be proven using several primary and secondary sources.  So I very much look forward to having her claims proven and also my own.  I do not expect she will do this since she post only in my trust feedback now and not on the thread anymore

Others on the thread did not complain only her.  She was in the wrong thread not me.

I never told anyone to buy or not buy in fact I only gave my opinions about things.

I even said do not trust me but do your own research.

So my free speech right was first threatened then punished with negative feedback by LAUDA.

This user is a troll and is using negative feedback to limit the right to speak by other users like me.

                                                                                            regards,

The line that is called trust is very thin., Its a good thing. 
A person who tag account resellers is also a very good thing. A shame they wont get banned.

Lauda is a scumbag, he has given us negative trust despite not having a clue about the situation.

He spends his whole time calling other people out without proper founding and brings no value to the forum.

This guy not fair... He sent me negative reputation because i asked the global moderator to delete my trust...
Check this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/negative-reputation-trust-hilariousandco-2372811
"Instead of 1 negative rating, you now have another one for free. What an amazing deal! " - Thats a no reason negative reputation... I don't know what is wrong with this guy...

Trust isn't moderated so unless you get him to delete it, that's not gonna happen. And besides, you also have a negative rating from hilariousandco so good luck getting that one off.


If you want to take yours from -4 to -8 or so, go right ahead.

For me too. This guy should be deleted!
He give negative reputations no reason, he just abusing TRUST RATING SYSTEM!!!! DELETE ALL OF HIS TRUSTS THIS IS UNFAIR!
Or we should do the same?! Give negatives for no reason? This guy -.-"

Yeah, we already know that. Check the first page and you'll see even the subject of this brain-dead accusation has answered him.

You are given a red trust rating because you are attempting to take small talks of a sale to others when you are just beginner you just made your way to the top first before getting yourself in those kinds of activities. You think your negative trust rating will be removed with the words you said to the moderator I don't think so sir. You should just focus more on investing rather than scamming others. Bitcoin is earned not taken away always remember that.

Scammers doing business with other shady individuals and scammers. Before you point fingers as "lauda and friends", you need to take a better look. Crybaby.