Pages:
Author

Topic: Low quality posts or abuse of trust? - page 2. (Read 495 times)

legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 5937
September 19, 2022, 10:00:25 AM
#7
As a newbie and someone who want to be comfortable in this forum, I observed that they're certain things that deserves attention from mods and administrators.
Since trust system is not moderated, there is nothing that mods and administrators can do, even if you prove (which you btw didn't do) that Jollygood abused trust system. The only ones that can do something about are DT members, if enough of them exclude him from their trust list. I suggest you to check how trust system actually works before creating similar threads.


How can you delete posts and still put it on the reference section? How do you want others to check your assertion? Where is the justice?
You are right here, he should have archived the posts he used as a reference for a feedback.


So tagging someone's account with neutral seems like a good compliment to you right? It's a defamation of account and that's a bad reputation to the affected users. No one will care if they really produce low quality posts as he claimed.
Neutrals are used so all sort of things and I don't think that one neutral feedback will prevent someone from joining the campaign if he is a decent poster. On top of that, a lot of members around here know that Jollygood is tends to be easy on negative feedbacks so I don't think that it has as much weight as you might think.


hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 583
Bons.io Telegram Casino
September 19, 2022, 09:10:43 AM
#6
So tagging someone's account with neutral seems like a good compliment to you right? It's a defamation of account and that's a bad reputation to the affected users. No one will care if they really produce low quality posts as he claimed.
You may be misinterpreting the given neutral tag. neutral tags will not affect the account's reputation. the account will still be able to register for the campaign (as long as it is not blacklisted by the bounty manager).
nothing moderates this system running. JollyGood and the other members have their own opinion on what they see.

OP, if you are a part of this drama I hope you communicate with the account that tagged it. asking for time to improve post quality and also asking for tag removal.
with that, I think all will get satisfaction.
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
September 19, 2022, 08:41:45 AM
#5
I thought Jollygood was giving negative tag to those 5 members, but when I checked it turns all of them was got neutral tag, so where's the abuse of trust is?

It's completely fine to leave a message with neutral tag, if other users are disagree with Jollygood personal message, they can vouch the user didn't a low quality poster or asking Jollygood to recheck their posts.

If it's negative tag I will it's abuse of trust, but the truth isn't.
So tagging someone's account with neutral seems like a good compliment to you right? It's a defamation of account and that's a bad reputation to the affected users. No one will care if they really produce low quality posts as he claimed.
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
September 19, 2022, 08:29:40 AM
#4
The reference link is incorrect. It leads simply to the topic, and no one can verify its authenticity. Perhaps you, Jollygood, need to add a link from the archives if you really want to. 
OP, the neutral tag doesn't mean anything; actmyname does exactly the same, but it's much clearer and has a blacklist. 
Maybe you, Jollygood, should do something similar. And people would have fewer questions. 
Also, just reporting the post to the moderators and letting them judge the correctness of the post could also solve the problems with another impending drama.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 556
September 19, 2022, 07:53:05 AM
#3
I thought Jollygood was giving negative tag to those 5 members, but when I checked it turns all of them was got neutral tag, so where's the abuse of trust is?

It's completely fine to leave a message with neutral tag, if other users are disagree with Jollygood personal message, they can vouch the user didn't a low quality poster or asking Jollygood to recheck their posts.

If it's negative tag I will it's abuse of trust, but the truth isn't.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 4795
September 19, 2022, 05:35:00 AM
#2
Many reputable members on this forum now against how Jollygood is using the trust feedback to the extent I read a post he was referred to as Jollybad. I like the kind of people that would accept others to be right when no one is in his support. I hope Jollygood would change and make use of the trust feedback appropriately. As for moderators and admin, they may do nothing for now as they do not want to interfere with trust system. Trust system is not moderated.
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
September 19, 2022, 05:18:07 AM
#1
As a newbie and someone who want to be comfortable in this forum, I observed that they're certain things that deserves attention from mods and administrators.
This user JollyGood after going through his profile and the trust feedback, I decided to make this post for clarification on what and how high quality posts looks like. Seeing him with high positive feedback and some negative feedback made me to go through his profile.
A sets of users were tagged by him as producing a low quality posts which made me to compare some posts and came up with this thread. To make it short, I will post just one post from some of the accounts that were tagged as producing low quality posts. Here we go...
Victim 1 post
Now there are 3 tokens in the Aidi Finance ecosystem: Aidi(BSC), Aidi(Matic) and Verse(Matic), and it's hard to say which one is better.
If you are going to trade in the short term, then it seems to me that Aidi(BSC) will be better since now the price is quite low ~$0.08204, but in January after the merger with the Aidi(Matic) token, the price will certainly be different, but the number of tokens in circulation will decrease to 48,000,000 (from 48 trillions).
And in the long run, maybe Verse, which now costs $0.18, but its ATH reached almost $6 and a total of 5,000,000 tokens, so I think it has potential, provided that the project gets further development, because the team started with 12 developers, of which 5 are left at the moment. And of course, do not forget the basic principle of investing in crypto, spend exactly as much as you can afford to lose.
Victim 2 post
Well most of my fellow members in this forum have provided with a lot of link that can help you so I won’t have much to say but to advise you that this forum is one of the most active and beneficial forum about bitcoin you will ever come across. You just have to be punctual and willing to learn by giving this forum total time and devotion. And when also you come across a problem feel free to post about it and rest assure you will be provided with solutions.
Victim 3 post
Although I know Halland will surely compete for the golden boot but I never thought he could just set the pace like this. Sincerely Halland is having it easy on this, because either the regular frontiers are having issues with there club or they are shadow of them.
First is Sallah, two goals in six matches no one saw this coming but his goal drought has been caused by the switch of roles by Klopp. Sallah was the pointed man during his mane-firmino-sallah trident. But right now he does the hard work mane and firmino were doing before and this has also affected the entire Liverpool team
Next is Harry Kane, one thing with him is he is always cold at the start of a season then goes back to normal middle of the season. I was even surprised to see him score in his sacred month (August). But let's wait and see
Victim 4 post
To add to it, the price of bitcoin cant go parabolic until after the halving. Ethereum is 20% of the marketcap while Bitcoin is about the double of it, it is a very good achievement for ethereum to stay this high at this time in the bear. Now the merge is done, which I think is the great biggest news of development in the space this year, lets see what goes ahead with the price and other altcoins. According to willy woo, the previous features of the market bottom had not reached but we are very close.
Victim 5 post
Bayern needs a midfielder and good striker. Even the Barcelona game, they did not dominate as such. I wonder why they thought they never needed a striker just like Chelsea. I don't see them going far in UEFA champion's league. They might win bundesliga because it is a weak league. Although using the league at this stage to find out the right dynamics is not a bad idea but they need to find an alternative to the football system that was adopted for the past long years and that was based on a #9 striker.
To make everything short and precise, I will stop at this 5. Now let see one among the posts of jollygood who accused other users of making low quality posts. Here we go...
Arsenal knew they would win because Brentford are not playing well, they will struggle this season. Arteta knew it would be easy 3 points which would take them back to the top of the table. I think Arsenal will behind Manchester City, Tottenham Hotspur and Manchester United and they will be challenging Liverpool for the 4th and final Champions League spot.

Let us all be fair and not bias, which among of these quotes Post is low quality for God sake? I don't know for you but I have my answer already which I believe you all know.
The victim 1-5 posts are not in anyway a low quality post. For equity to prevail, I am aware that the forum has standard for quality and low quality posts but I want JollyGood to tell the forum the criteria he uses to access posts before giving his verdict and tagged it a low quality posts and, provide the victim's post he deleted as low quality post for others to see as well. How can you delete posts and still put it on the reference section? How do you want others to check your assertion? Where is the justice?
In conclusion, JollyGood should review the tags because it is seen as abuse of trust and way to intimidate the upcoming users. However, I can say BitcoinGirl.Club has been vindicated for saying
Quote
The user used to be a scam buster (past) but now he use his earned reputation to process nonsense against the people he do not like, make others his hostage with the red tag, demands unlawful private information to share and protect his employers to secure his job. Do not take any tag left by him as good reference.
In one of the comments on trust feedback of JollyGood.
Tagging people's account for low quality post while you're also not perfect is absolutely hypocritical. No shade!

This post is not sponsored or not in any way to dent the reputation of anyone but to ensure the forum is serene and, where there's freedom for anyone as it suppose to be and not to be a ground of intimidation where the strong oppress the weak.
Pages:
Jump to: