Topic: [LTCD] LitecoinDark.com ★ Scrypt ★ Difficulty Shield ★ Multipool ★ Fast - page 185. (Read 368565 times)
September 24, 2014, 05:18:36 PM
Nice look :-)
September 24, 2014, 05:18:18 PM
First I heard of Supernet... Is that on the RC forum or something? Is there a date for that or is it just in discussion?
September 24, 2014, 05:18:00 PM
And some f***** is still driving the price down.
And there was me hopping we had seen the last of the 3 digit prices...
And there was me hopping we had seen the last of the 3 digit prices...
September 24, 2014, 05:16:57 PM
Bots. Name change. SuperNET. A new mining pool. LTCD 2.0. A beta test.
That's all that comes to mind, right away. But I do think there was more.
Oh, yeah - Exchanges (stop submitting). Reward reduction. Logo.
That's all that comes to mind, right away. But I do think there was more.
Oh, yeah - Exchanges (stop submitting). Reward reduction. Logo.
good evening all. Is there an possibility that some one can fill me in on the days actions???
I have read a bit and am very happy to see there is a new team member.
Congrats @Xircom
I wish you all the best.
Also is there any news on the block reward reduction.
I think this will be a great idea but to do it with the a huge publicity and to advertise it well for that it happens when the next halving comes around.
I am still worried that a lot of people will get angry and divert the coin totally.
Who knows.
I have read a bit and am very happy to see there is a new team member.
Congrats @Xircom
I wish you all the best.
Also is there any news on the block reward reduction.
I think this will be a great idea but to do it with the a huge publicity and to advertise it well for that it happens when the next halving comes around.
I am still worried that a lot of people will get angry and divert the coin totally.
Who knows.
Cheers mate. thats saved me 20 pages of back tracking. Its unbelievable how quickly this forum is building these days.
September 24, 2014, 05:15:24 PM
I still see all this talk of a name change, and while it may be a good idea for later, maybe at the 2.0 launch, right now we're known as LTCD. I seriously doubt "dark" is discouraging investors. It's far more likely that someone holding a massive amount of a coin that is being quickly depleted still in its infancy is discouraging new investors. I am 100% behind the idea of dropping the block rewards. I am 100% behind adding proof of stake. I'm also 100% behind the current list of bugfixes and resolutions that I'm working on (ie. the pchMessageStart problem).
The way I see things, I wish I had gotten the opportunity to help with this coin prior to its initial launch. I would almost propose relaunching LTCD with a side blockchain using proof-of-burn and trading 1:1 or even 1:0.5 with the new codebase to reduce the number of coins in circulation, without raising the 82,003,200 cap and allowing a definite start to proof-of-stake block generation and rewards.
Some of these things will need to be addressed VERY quickly if LTCD is to survive. Some of these things may be damaging to our reputation in the short term, but I think we'll end up with a better infrastructure and more room for growth with the possibility of expansion very soon.
I have forked litecoin (again) into a staging repository where I'm going to build (yet another) testing-only currency to run some specific simulations and work out my own proof-of-stake implementation outside of core. The sources will be open, so you can feel free to compile your own, but consider it a semi-closed beta as binary wallets will only be distributed to a select few of those willing to help run various scenarios. In this staging currency, there will a stipulation within the license agreement that you are NOT allowed to buy or sell the currency for any real-world currency, crypto, fiat, precious metals or anything else that can be given a monetary value EXCEPT the staging coin itself. It is something I'd like to keep as a staging ground for 2.0 features with no direct ties to LTCD other than hypotheticals.
PM for invites for beta testing. I'll personally vet the testing candidates and decide who can get an early copy.
The staging currency I'm referring to is NOT LTCD 2.0, it is only a test bed (beyond the scope of testnet) for future feature integration within LTCD proper.
The way I see things, I wish I had gotten the opportunity to help with this coin prior to its initial launch. I would almost propose relaunching LTCD with a side blockchain using proof-of-burn and trading 1:1 or even 1:0.5 with the new codebase to reduce the number of coins in circulation, without raising the 82,003,200 cap and allowing a definite start to proof-of-stake block generation and rewards.
Some of these things will need to be addressed VERY quickly if LTCD is to survive. Some of these things may be damaging to our reputation in the short term, but I think we'll end up with a better infrastructure and more room for growth with the possibility of expansion very soon.
I have forked litecoin (again) into a staging repository where I'm going to build (yet another) testing-only currency to run some specific simulations and work out my own proof-of-stake implementation outside of core. The sources will be open, so you can feel free to compile your own, but consider it a semi-closed beta as binary wallets will only be distributed to a select few of those willing to help run various scenarios. In this staging currency, there will a stipulation within the license agreement that you are NOT allowed to buy or sell the currency for any real-world currency, crypto, fiat, precious metals or anything else that can be given a monetary value EXCEPT the staging coin itself. It is something I'd like to keep as a staging ground for 2.0 features with no direct ties to LTCD other than hypotheticals.
PM for invites for beta testing. I'll personally vet the testing candidates and decide who can get an early copy.
The staging currency I'm referring to is NOT LTCD 2.0, it is only a test bed (beyond the scope of testnet) for future feature integration within LTCD proper.
Can i be one of your testers?? hihi good at scenarios.
Well done Troll I like what I am reading.
September 24, 2014, 05:12:42 PM
re: SuperNet. The dev has far too much to do at this point than to start thinking about something like that. Besides which, pretty sure the coin couldn't be part of it anyway in it's current state as I don't think you can join if you're not much more than a clone. It appears to me that the dev has a lot of plans that will result in this coin having some very unique features in a few months at which point it might be possible.
September 24, 2014, 05:12:04 PM
Bots. Name change. SuperNET. A new mining pool. LTCD 2.0. A beta test.
That's all that comes to mind, right away. But I do think there was more.
Oh, yeah - Exchanges (stop submitting). Reward reduction. Logo.
That's all that comes to mind, right away. But I do think there was more.
Oh, yeah - Exchanges (stop submitting). Reward reduction. Logo.
good evening all. Is there an possibility that some one can fill me in on the days actions???
I have read a bit and am very happy to see there is a new team member.
Congrats @Xircom
I wish you all the best.
Also is there any news on the block reward reduction.
I think this will be a great idea but to do it with the a huge publicity and to advertise it well for that it happens when the next halving comes around.
I am still worried that a lot of people will get angry and divert the coin totally.
Who knows.
I have read a bit and am very happy to see there is a new team member.
Congrats @Xircom
I wish you all the best.
Also is there any news on the block reward reduction.
I think this will be a great idea but to do it with the a huge publicity and to advertise it well for that it happens when the next halving comes around.
I am still worried that a lot of people will get angry and divert the coin totally.
Who knows.
September 24, 2014, 05:08:06 PM
good evening all. Is there an possibility that some one can fill me in on the days actions???
I have read a bit and am very happy to see there is a new team member.
Congrats @Xircom
I wish you all the best.
Also is there any news on the block reward reduction.
I think this will be a great idea but to do it with the a huge publicity and to advertise it well for that it happens when the next halving comes around.
I am still worried that a lot of people will get angry and divert the coin totally.
Who knows.
I have read a bit and am very happy to see there is a new team member.
Congrats @Xircom
I wish you all the best.
Also is there any news on the block reward reduction.
I think this will be a great idea but to do it with the a huge publicity and to advertise it well for that it happens when the next halving comes around.
I am still worried that a lot of people will get angry and divert the coin totally.
Who knows.
September 24, 2014, 05:05:10 PM
I posted my version of the red logo
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=781305.new#new
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=781305.new#new
September 24, 2014, 05:02:18 PM
Some coins have declined the opportunity to join SuperNET, based on the suspicion that SuperNET might take advantage of those coins' benefits but not contribute anything beneficial to those coins. There is some distrust scattered around.
I personally haven't taken a close look at SuperNET but would advise a bit of extra caution before making any concrete decision.
This should be the next topic
I personally haven't taken a close look at SuperNET but would advise a bit of extra caution before making any concrete decision.
I've got the question to Devs.
Have you guys, maybe, contacted BitcoinDark developers if they would be willing to share their SuperNET technology?
Have you guys, maybe, contacted BitcoinDark developers if they would be willing to share their SuperNET technology?
This should be the next topic
I came to the exact same conclusion when reading up on superNet.
Might want to hold off untill we can see how other coins are actually benefiting from it when(if) its up and running.
Its all a bit of a blur right now i feel.
Not at the top of the wishing list for now i would say
September 24, 2014, 04:57:35 PM
Some coins have declined the opportunity to join SuperNET, based on the suspicion that SuperNET might take advantage of those coins' benefits but not contribute anything beneficial to those coins. There is some distrust scattered around.
I personally haven't taken a close look at SuperNET but would advise a bit of extra caution before making any concrete decision.
This should be the next topic
I personally haven't taken a close look at SuperNET but would advise a bit of extra caution before making any concrete decision.
I've got the question to Devs.
Have you guys, maybe, contacted BitcoinDark developers if they would be willing to share their SuperNET technology?
Have you guys, maybe, contacted BitcoinDark developers if they would be willing to share their SuperNET technology?
This should be the next topic
Which is why we should discuss it in the other forum or reddit. Whichever.
September 24, 2014, 04:52:22 PM
Some coins have declined the opportunity to join SuperNET, based on the suspicion that SuperNET might take advantage of those coins' benefits but not contribute anything beneficial to those coins. There is some distrust scattered around.
I personally haven't taken a close look at SuperNET but would advise a bit of extra caution before making any concrete decision.
This should be the next topic
I personally haven't taken a close look at SuperNET but would advise a bit of extra caution before making any concrete decision.
I've got the question to Devs.
Have you guys, maybe, contacted BitcoinDark developers if they would be willing to share their SuperNET technology?
Have you guys, maybe, contacted BitcoinDark developers if they would be willing to share their SuperNET technology?
This should be the next topic
September 24, 2014, 04:51:26 PM
I've got the question to Devs.
Have you guys, maybe, contacted BitcoinDark developers if they would be willing to share their SuperNET technology?
Have you guys, maybe, contacted BitcoinDark developers if they would be willing to share their SuperNET technology?
This should be the next topic
Hold on guys, I think we need to focus on the development of the v. 2.0 and then add-ons later on.
2.0 Whitepaper before anything else, then launch of v.2.0, then new features.
September 24, 2014, 04:49:31 PM
I vote:
Downgrade the reward. As soon as can be managed.
I'm one of the people mining, spread hash on more than one single pool. The current reward is too generous.
Downgrade the reward. As soon as can be managed.
I'm one of the people mining, spread hash on more than one single pool. The current reward is too generous.
in this respect, agree with all 100%.
Downgrade the reward.
really a big reward. we need to increase the prospect of production of at least a year
but do not share issued coins. after such a coin will certainly lose confidence.
imagine. you buy LTCD on 10 BTC. thereafter your coins to be reduced two times.
does not matter that this is offset by an increase in the proportional liquidity - visually it's not nice.
September 24, 2014, 04:43:40 PM
I've got the question to Devs.
Have you guys, maybe, contacted BitcoinDark developers if they would be willing to share their SuperNET technology?
Have you guys, maybe, contacted BitcoinDark developers if they would be willing to share their SuperNET technology?
This should be the next topic
September 24, 2014, 04:42:25 PM
Why are you guys even discussing the name change when there are still features being developed. I'd much rather keep the name and focus heavily on development.
I agree. If you change your name, that's for me a little bit silly. It will destroy ltcd. I know that for sure. So keep it like this or stop with it!
September 24, 2014, 04:39:08 PM
I love the current name and everyone knows what i'm talking about when mentioning LTCD.
I personally have no intrest in seeing a different name, but thats my opinion.
If i may be completly honest, i would actually hate a name change.
I personally have no intrest in seeing a different name, but thats my opinion.
If i may be completly honest, i would actually hate a name change.
September 24, 2014, 04:37:43 PM
I've got the question to Devs.
Have you guys, maybe, contacted BitcoinDark developers if they would be willing to share their SuperNET technology?
Have you guys, maybe, contacted BitcoinDark developers if they would be willing to share their SuperNET technology?
September 24, 2014, 04:34:25 PM
Maybe this public service announcement will help?!?
As I see it some guys forgets to read some pages back before making new posts :-)
September 24, 2014, 04:32:49 PM
I vote:
Downgrade the reward. As soon as can be managed.
I'm one of the people mining, spread hash on more than one single pool. The current reward is too generous.
Downgrade the reward. As soon as can be managed.
I'm one of the people mining, spread hash on more than one single pool. The current reward is too generous.
As Troll says, I think we should downgrade the blockreward ASAP.
Is this ok with the community ?
Is this ok with the community ?
Jump to: