Yeah I think it's at the point where we are all moving out of the denial state.
Does that mean you're entering the anger state?
I should be, but to be honest just feeling passive about it all.
Topic: LTCgear.com, the best scrypt/scrypt n/X11 cloud mining service, Not paying!!! - page 108. (Read 361391 times)
January 18, 2015, 10:36:40 AM
Does that mean you're entering the anger state?
I should be, but to be honest just feeling passive about it all.
January 18, 2015, 10:34:30 AM
Yeah I think it's at the point where we are all moving out of the denial state.
Does that mean you're entering the anger state?
January 18, 2015, 10:26:45 AM
Yeah I think it's at the point where we are all moving out of the denial state.
January 18, 2015, 09:51:03 AM
It seems most people lost hope by now. Some weeks ago there was considerable
activity when a deadline came close, but now noone expects anything except
another delay
activity when a deadline came close, but now noone expects anything except
another delay
January 18, 2015, 09:49:19 AM
Just looking at the site it's a bit unclear what the ETA is exactly. Just today in general? Midnight?
Ofcourse it will be midnight then everything changes!
(If by everything u mean 18 into 19-21)
January 18, 2015, 09:46:54 AM
Today is the big day...maybe.
Second before countdown finish they will change it again
dont put your hope to Ltcgear mate
January 18, 2015, 09:44:25 AM
Just looking at the site it's a bit unclear what the ETA is exactly. Just today in general? Midnight?
January 18, 2015, 09:17:15 AM
Today is the big day...maybe.
It's unlikely imho, I never got any shares from ltcgear directly i got some from ipominer but after 6 weeks? Without payment I'm far from hopeful if it does payout I should get my investment back
January 18, 2015, 06:53:34 AM
Today is the big day...maybe.
January 18, 2015, 05:30:18 AM
ltcgear forums down for maintenence at the mo. Maybe not the best day for it 
January 17, 2015, 10:55:40 AM
there is a hard core group of guys that are trying to bully everybody they constantly post and have an attitude where the share holder is to blame- no matter what you post the end result is they say you should have your money taken. so not only are they not upset from a loss they are pro you losing... yes resellers have responsibility, and if not then the court can decide if they refuse arbitration. but lets start getting the ball rolling. cris is a few people put together. they are easy to spot they constantly troll the people trying to recover lost funds[/font] well if u drive the car while somebody robs the bank- your guilty too. if you sell ponzi shares while a guy runs a ponzi-your guilty too (disclaimers are only relevant if the business was legit). i meant exactly as it said no interpretation nessasary. so acording to your logic it would be ok to drive a get away car. and if you disagree that is fine that is why i am saying let a profesional meed out justice- that is how justis systems work- you dont let the accused be the judge and jury for themselves- lets get some profesionals involved- so lets get a list of those persons selling the share- the ones that had the actual sites- i would think that is what they want anyway-maybe there is some partial legitamacy
You lost me after the first line. Learn how to construct and format paragraphs and sentences properly.
My .02
January 17, 2015, 09:55:42 AM
there is a hard core group of guys that are trying to bully everybody they constantly post and have an attitude where the share holder is to blame- no matter what you post the end result is they say you should have your money taken. so not only are they not upset from a loss they are pro you losing... yes resellers have responsibility, and if not then the court can decide if they refuse arbitration. but lets start getting the ball rolling. cris is a few people put together. they are easy to spot they constantly troll the people trying to recover lost funds[/font] well if u drive the car while somebody robs the bank- your guilty too. if you sell ponzi shares while a guy runs a ponzi-your guilty too (disclaimers are only relevant if the business was legit). i meant exactly as it said no interpretation nessasary. so acording to your logic it would be ok to drive a get away car. and if you disagree that is fine that is why i am saying let a profesional meed out justice- that is how justis systems work- you dont let the accused be the judge and jury for themselves- lets get some profesionals involved- so lets get a list of those persons selling the share- the ones that had the actual sites- i would think that is what they want anyway-maybe there is some partial legitamacy
I probably speak for a lot of people here. No clue what you are trying to say.
True that. Let's have a good weekend and see again on monday.
) January 17, 2015, 05:51:09 AM
there is a hard core group of guys that are trying to bully everybody they constantly post and have an attitude where the share holder is to blame- no matter what you post the end result is they say you should have your money taken. so not only are they not upset from a loss they are pro you losing... yes resellers have responsibility, and if not then the court can decide if they refuse arbitration. but lets start getting the ball rolling. cris is a few people put together. they are easy to spot they constantly troll the people trying to recover lost funds[/font] well if u drive the car while somebody robs the bank- your guilty too. if you sell ponzi shares while a guy runs a ponzi-your guilty too (disclaimers are only relevant if the business was legit). i meant exactly as it said no interpretation nessasary. so acording to your logic it would be ok to drive a get away car. and if you disagree that is fine that is why i am saying let a profesional meed out justice- that is how justis systems work- you dont let the accused be the judge and jury for themselves- lets get some profesionals involved- so lets get a list of those persons selling the share- the ones that had the actual sites- i would think that is what they want anyway-maybe there is some partial legitamacy
I probably speak for a lot of people here. No clue what you are trying to say.
True that. Let's have a good weekend and see again on monday.
January 17, 2015, 05:39:30 AM
there is a hard core group of guys that are trying to bully everybody they constantly post and have an attitude where the share holder is to blame- no matter what you post the end result is they say you should have your money taken. so not only are they not upset from a loss they are pro you losing... yes resellers have responsibility, and if not then the court can decide if they refuse arbitration. but lets start getting the ball rolling. cris is a few people put together. they are easy to spot they constantly troll the people trying to recover lost funds[/font] well if u drive the car while somebody robs the bank- your guilty too. if you sell ponzi shares while a guy runs a ponzi-your guilty too (disclaimers are only relevant if the business was legit). i meant exactly as it said no interpretation nessasary. so acording to your logic it would be ok to drive a get away car. and if you disagree that is fine that is why i am saying let a profesional meed out justice- that is how justis systems work- you dont let the accused be the judge and jury for themselves- lets get some profesionals involved- so lets get a list of those persons selling the share- the ones that had the actual sites- i would think that is what they want anyway-maybe there is some partial legitamacy
I probably speak for a lot of people here. No clue what you are trying to say.
January 17, 2015, 05:15:33 AM
this site only can give hope
they should relaunch and change name to HOPEGear
they should relaunch and change name to HOPEGear
January 17, 2015, 12:44:34 AM
reading this thread is like hope never dies, ...
It's not hope. It's sheer prayer, even if I don't believe. But I'm going to continue to check on this, as I have quite a bit of money into it, so that's all there is to it. lol
January 16, 2015, 11:48:53 PM
there is a hard core group of guys that are trying to bully everybody they constantly post and have an attitude where the share holder is to blame- no matter what you post the end result is they say you should have your money taken. so not only are they not upset from a loss they are pro you losing... yes resellers have responsibility, and if not then the court can decide if they refuse arbitration. but lets start getting the ball rolling. cris is a few people put together. they are easy to spot they constantly troll the people trying to recover lost funds[/font] well if u drive the car while somebody robs the bank- your guilty too. if you sell ponzi shares while a guy runs a ponzi-your guilty too (disclaimers are only relevant if the business was legit). i meant exactly as it said no interpretation nessasary. so acording to your logic it would be ok to drive a get away car. and if you disagree that is fine that is why i am saying let a profesional meed out justice- that is how justis systems work- you dont let the accused be the judge and jury for themselves- lets get some profesionals involved- so lets get a list of those persons selling the share- the ones that had the actual sites- i would think that is what they want anyway-maybe there is some partial legitamacy
January 16, 2015, 04:24:00 PM
I've bought from resellers but have no idea why I'd be doxxing any of them with no evidence of complicity.
Not sure what to make of this update. It's good to see some more info, a bit firmer, but also it must be because of the pressure so all in all not sure the whiners did us a disservice.
Not sure what to make of this update. It's good to see some more info, a bit firmer, but also it must be because of the pressure so all in all not sure the whiners did us a disservice.
January 16, 2015, 02:05:50 PM
well- the new message style actually was a result of people starting to organize to do something about this. hundreds of thousands of dollars were stolen and there has been no comunication from the person that holds them. also a ton of resellers are acting like they have nothing to do with it and they are not responsible. well if u drive the car while somebody robs the bank- your guilty too. if you sell ponzi share while a guy runs a ponzi-your guilty too (disclaimers are only relevant if the business was legit). if ltcgear got hacked (and it has not been verified by a 3rd party independent source) then that would be a failuer by ltcgear not its share holders. we need to go after the resellers in the US. if they fought it they would lose so hard-it is as easy as them not having a liscense to resell. also, there has been an extreme amount of people pretending to be share holders that lost out that are blaming share holders and defending theft from share holders-this is beyond absurd. there is definately something going on there. [size=16please dox the resellers so we can get the ball rollingpt][/size] they have asssets that can be split up among the US lawsuit participants. also when they start to fall a ton of info will start to come out and we will see that this cris connection is a little larger. then btc can rebound one day
worst BS i've read in the last days. of course, resellers are not responsible, except if they had insider info, which you should *prove* before making rediculous appeals for doxing. comparison with the car driver is utterly stupid, i think it's not necessary to elaborate on that.
you should really find another hobby, nobody is taking you serious with this.
I stopped reading after one line. Really.
January 16, 2015, 12:55:42 PM
well- the new message style actually was a result of people starting to organize to do something about this. hundreds of thousands of dollars were stolen and there has been no comunication from the person that holds them. also a ton of resellers are acting like they have nothing to do with it and they are not responsible. well if u drive the car while somebody robs the bank- your guilty too. if you sell ponzi share while a guy runs a ponzi-your guilty too (disclaimers are only relevant if the business was legit). if ltcgear got hacked (and it has not been verified by a 3rd party independent source) then that would be a failuer by ltcgear not its share holders. we need to go after the resellers in the US. if they fought it they would lose so hard-it is as easy as them not having a liscense to resell. also, there has been an extreme amount of people pretending to be share holders that lost out that are blaming share holders and defending theft from share holders-this is beyond absurd. there is definately something going on there. [size=16please dox the resellers so we can get the ball rollingpt][/size] they have asssets that can be split up among the US lawsuit participants. also when they start to fall a ton of info will start to come out and we will see that this cris connection is a little larger. then btc can rebound one day
worst BS i've read in the last days. of course, resellers are not responsible, except if they had insider info, which you should *prove* before making rediculous appeals for doxing. comparison with the car driver is utterly stupid, i think it's not necessary to elaborate on that.
you should really find another hobby, nobody is taking you serious with this.
Jump to: