Topic: Lucius is signature spammer by dkbit98 ? - page 2. (Read 873 times)

There is an accusation being made in this thread but the accused is not allowed to respond here. Neutral feedback is appropriate. Negative (or positive) would not be. Ideally both these users should ignore each other and go their separate ways but that almost never happens here on Bitcointalk.

Now excuse me, I'm off to create a thread complaining about hacker1001101001 using a mild ad hominem against me in a discussion. The audacity! Unacceptable.


More of a "fuck you" merit probably for being unable to respond directly

But yes, let's call it an olive branch, hit ignore and lock and go back to our regularly scheduled programming of other inconsequential dramas.

I agree, and I also posted in that thread.  Upon revisiting it just now, it looks like two members got defensive and it escalated way past the point that it should have.  

You and dkbit98 are both helpful posters as far as I'm concerned, and I don't see any real issues you two should have with each other, though I understand you took offense to him alluding to you satisfying your "signature quote" (lol).  I get the feeling dkbit98 thinks there's an extreme bias in the HW section toward Ledger products, and he was feeling just a little bit grouchy about that while making replies.  

My suggestion:  both of you bury the hatchet.  You're both valuable members of the forum.  And even if dkbit98 doesn't want to bury said hatchet, at least take the high road yourself and let it go.  No harm, no foul.  And the consensus seems to be that what he wrote about you isn't true.

Edit: Just noticed dkbit98 gave you a merit, so perhaps that's his form of an olive branch....?

That's just called not being respectful to others, and spamming on there trust wall. Looks like you are saying trust feedbacks are a nice place to send advice. ( coming from someone in DT )

While you are correct that he has already said what he thinks about you but still it would be pretty good to see why he thinks that you are a signature spammer, simply making correction of his post would never make a man feel someone is signature spammer. I would always appreciate anyone who correct me when I am wrong. I doubt that was the case here. You would rather allow him to post here and express what's the inner actually.

He has already said everything he had, why he would have to express his opinions here? I was interested in what others thought, and I'm glad that some members wrote their honest opinion without fear of getting such silly feedback as that little genius left me. Now after your post I believe others will be much more careful with their posts.

As for feedback, do you think something needs to be written literally to be said? What he was implying was that I literally spammed his thread with my signature to collect a couple of posts, but no one will say that I was just correcting his inaccurate statements which is why he reacted that way.

---

Thanks for the answer, anyone who wants to be objective can see the situation exactly as it is - I do not take things personally, but this is not the first time I experience the same from the same person, so I decided to react.

---

JeromeTash , Little Mouse, mocacinno , hacker1001101001 thanks for your posts.

---

Rikafip, I did not expect that you or any other member from Croatian local board will come here and support me against dkbit98 in any way, but I think I have the right, like any other member, to open a thread about anything - even if it seemed completely irrelevant to you.

I honestly don't think that's the case here. Maybe it's just me, but his comment looked more like a tease than claiming you are just a signature spammer. People say that to each other quite often here, especially when they have different opinion about something and if I am you I wouldn't give it a second thought, let alone make topic about such an irrelevant remark.

Creating a thread about someone and not letting them respond is quite nasty. I did that once to Quickseller (I think) and I still feel bad about it.

dkbit98's advice in your trust feedback is spot on. Grow a thicker skin. Pretty much everyone with a paid signature gets called a sig spammer at some point. Creating a thread about it just proves their point.

This thread title though... made me think you're dkbit98's alt.

You are not a signature spammer in anyway, dkbit98 don't even seem to be a friendly person overall.

As far as i'm concerned, i've always liked the way you post. I can't recall any instances in which I perceived any of your posts a being spammy.

I don't want to dig into this particular occurence, but i can say i've been called a sigspammer a couple of times, usually when having a discussion with somebody that was losing said discussion (at least from my point of view). I've always seen these shout-outs as a hail-mary pass.
I guess the general idear is: "I don't agree with this user, but i cannot win this discussion, so i'll point out this user is wearing a signature instead and hope other people will change their point of view towards my opponent and also brand him a sigspammer. Thus avoiding the valid points he/she is making in this discussion. This way I can distract other people from the fact i'm losing and save face ".

Once again: i don't know if this was the case here, it's just something that has happened to me a couple of times before. And i've seen similar instances involving other people aswell.

If I can remember correctly, I have seen you helping people on the forum a few times. This simply proves that you are not a signature spammer in my opinion.
One more thing is that I know how Darkstar_ manage campaign here. If he finds anyone as signature spammer, I am sure that he will remove the participant. Everyone should know that CM is not that easy to get or easy to keep up unless participant is a decent one.
Maybe dkbit98 has something wrong with you. May be you have hurt him before.
One thing I understand in this forum that if you raise your voice, you are making a lot of enemies here, I have been a victim of such case. Anyway, I think you should sort out the matter with dkbit98 through PM.

Nah, you are not a signature spammer. You are actually some one knowledge and helpful as I have read most of your responses to different topics around the forum.
Why would someone take it so personal just because you disagreed with them on a few topics. The signature quota jibe was below the belt and wasn't really necessary

dkbit98 behaved quite irrational in that linked topic.
My guess would be that he is somehow affiliated with the cheap 1960's style hardware wallet. Therefore he sounded a little bit harsh whenever someone was criticizing it.

Just check the spreadsheet containing all participants. People are removed quite frequently when they don't meet the quality standards anymore.
As long as you are not removed, you can be assured that your posts are not considered spam.

I disagree with you in some topics (i.e. when debating about windows 7), but wouldn't consider it being spam.

So to answer your question: No. IMO dkbit98 simply is not fully in control of his emotions. Don't take it personal.

I avoid this part of the forum as much as possible because I am not a person who enjoys endless discussions about someone’s reputation or similar things. I try to follow the rules of the forum and be as correct as possible towards other users, which I do not always succeed in, but I think that most people perceive me as a positive person on the forum (exceptions, of course, always exist).

What particularly bothers me is that someone calls me a signature spammer, because I have never been one and I have zero tolerance for such people. Although I do not pay much attention to such things, I have been in a similar situation many times as today, so I think I should react and point out the somewhat strange behavior of a user who indirectly called me a signature spammer. He of course shares the opinion of some other members of my local community who also used the same terminology when I was concerned.

I would ask members to visit this topic : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5265233.20 (https://archive.vn/lehNQ) and to tell me what they think of the member dkbit98 and his opinion that I am a signature spammer or his attitude in general when we speak of some solid facts?

Interestingly, the person in question shares an identical opinion with his colleague from the local board :



Translated : "Glad it helps you in your CM weekly quota"

I know that there is great envy and contempt for those who are members of the CM campaign, and dkbit98 is applied in same campaign few times (unsuccessful) just like his pal btcltcdigger - but that does not give them the right to call other signatures spammers.

Question I want to ask the members of this forum: In your opinion, is Lucius a person who only meets his signature quota, which would mean that he is a signature spammer, or are user comments like dkbit98 completely unfounded and inappropriate?

Local rule : dkbit98&btcltcdigger are not allowed to post here - their opinion is already quite familiar to me.