The practice of forcing people to have to race to sign back up when they receive payment is no way to treat your employees/vendors/suppliers/advertisers. This is project management 101 that you treat this class of people you work with fairly and allow them a fair opportunity to earn a steady income. If they are racing to sign up again you are depriving them of the ability to earn a steady income.
Anytime a company treats the above class of people good the company will benefit and when a company treats the above class of people poorly the company will suffer, both over the long term
I wasn't referring to other campaigns, I was referring to what they advertise. Like I said, any fly-by-night operation can pay for signatures - just because the signature campaign pays doesn't make the product or advertiser trustworthy and you bring up a prime example. I thought that was clear since my entire post was about reflecting the reputation of Lucky Bit through the campaign's (arguably difficult) system. This campaign is as different from its competition as Lucky Bit is to its competition.
Signature enrollments are not employees and there has never been a promise of steady income. This is not a job opening for people simply looking to get paid to advertise. I have repeatedly stressed this fact throughout the campaign. I re-iterate: if you just want to get paid for posting, there are lots of signature campaigns.
Updating FAQ since this is the nth time I've had to address it.