I will discuss your situation with the Lucky Bit administration.
LB admins here. Stingle asked for our opinion since eventually we pay for this campaign. On our side we trust him, so if somebody has an issue in the future, unless Stingle chooses himself to explicitly defer to us, it's pointless to do it yourself.
LuckyBit is by now not only one of the most trusted gambling games in bitcoin, but also one of the most trusted sig campaigns. We are paying relatively well, extremely reliably (Stingle does it pretty much every day - or is it really every day?), for a rather low number of post. We already thought about increasing the number of minimum posts (our campaign is typically on high demand), but we didn't, we tend to value quality over quantity. You enroll with us, and you know 100% we won't cheat you: if you play according to the rules, on our side we'll pay you at the end for the service you provided.
The way I see it now is they're trying to get out of paying me through a technicality.
For anybody remotely familiar with LB, it's ridiculous to imagine we would like to get into troubles publicly to save 0.05
BTC. We passed today 10k
BTC wagered on the site, and surely you'll agree we have better things to do than stealing 0.05
BTC from you.
If Luckybit is legitimate I expect them to pay me.
I demand 0.05 BTC be sent [...] or I will give negative rep.
This does look like extortion. Not gonna help.
You know we value a lot sain relationships, within the LB team, with our partners, and with our customers when they contact us, sometimes even to the point of being too accommodating. But you'll never know, because you wanted everything to be public and you went aggressive.
We won't pay you because it would be unfair to people who previously were unpaid for similar reasons, and to those who won't get paid in future for similar reasons. The rules are in the OP, and are pretty crystal clear after Stingle polished them over time. If you want to argue they are subjective: everything in words is always subjective, we do our best to make them precise, but what matters ultimately is the opinion of external people. If you want to leave us a bad rating, go ahead but be honest and include the link to this post so at least everybody can make their own opinion.
To everybody else: we hope you understand our stance. Stingle wrote all the rules precisely to avoid this kind of thing, so if you sign up with us please pay attention to the rules first.
LuckyBit in general aims at being one of the most honest websites around here, and the only fundamental for this is: rules agreed upon are holy.