Topic: Lutpin | Veteran Signature Campaign Manager - page 2. (Read 15831 times)

Thank you for that beautiful answer, sir.

I agree with your point but there are some people who would blame anyone and everyone when they find out they've been working for 2 weeks under a Campaign only to find their help coins worth 0.002BTC. The next thing they do is look for the OP of the Campaign thread. They don't understand the difference between a Campaign Manager and the Owner of the Campaign. They leave a negative trust under the Manager's name.

Suppose I don't have enough trust as you. My main account is Sr. Member. What is the minimum amount I should hold from the campaign manager besides the Escrow while running the campaign? Also, when does the Escrow pay the users? Can I ask him to pay a fraction of his amount to the users if the Owner is late in his payments? I am saying this because earlier I ran a campaign and a delayed payment from the owner had me in trouble

Thanks.

---

Thank you.

Lutpin is a great campaign manager. I don't know how he handles it all, but he's a miracle worker for sure.

Seriously though. This isn't the only place he "works" at.

The one having an eye on everything.

who is the Lutpin in both of them?  

I ran quite a few campaigns I'd now consider small, OneHash being one example.
While I now focus on bigger/long term projects mostly, I'm always open to pick up something else for a time.
Let me know what you got in mind, and I'll tell you if I'm the guy for it

May contact you soon about setting up a small signature campaign for one of my services soon. You seem like you do well with the camps you run but would you work with running a small low paying one?

you deserve to be commended, sir, for your integrity is very remarkable, and why I wanted to join the camp bitvest.io sign it because I was so inspired by your sir, and want to be bitcoiner like you, and want to be in your management sir.
applause for your sir
and good luck for you

As someone who is paid a higher amount then most people in the bitvest sig campaign Lutpin has always made sure to send me a message about the wallet needing to be filled to pay me out.
Most other sigs i have been involved with I'm lucky if i even got a reply in a few days but he is good on answering back when it deals with payments.

He seems very responsible and actually looks through all the posts people make to make sure people aren't just spamming i would recommend him to take on your campaign.

probably one of my inspiration to pursue my management service, Aside from yahoo tho  lol I wonder how much  do you gain to every campaign that you managed(Im just being practical tho  )

keep up the good work tho

thanks to this post Lutpin keep it up im looking for work and i saw your thread so i will make reviews where i can join sig camp that is fit me

Hello.

To Sour Thunder,
Advertising Campaign is what Lutpin manages. It is not in his hands if the project/coin/site succeed or fail in due time. As answered by him, there are factors(several of them really) aside from advertising that can make the project/coin/site a success/failure.

Lutpin and Yahoo are dead-serious in their jobs as managers. I see posts of both of them from time to time as I scan for quality reads. If ever the project/coin/site that Lutpin managed did not go very successful, he still did his task .

Not that my word carries any weight here or means a lot but I can vouch for Lutpin's expertise in managing signature campaigns.

I've been in the 777Dice Sig Campaign for a long time, Lutpin has been managing the campaign for a while now & payments are always on time, he manages the campaign very well.

Thanks

There's a lot of potential for discussion in the two short questions you've posted.
Let me try to give a brief (or not so brief, upon rereading my draft) answer to each, without getting too far into details and examples (I still got a little, sorry),
but still one that should give you sufficient information (not trying to textwall this thread).

When a project fails, there are several possible reasons for it. In the rarest cases, one thing is solely responsible.

I always try to set up the best possible campaign, or what I (based on my experience) think to be the best possible campaign.
In many cases, that works out pretty good, for example with CryptoGames, we're running since June 2015 now and when we ran into problems, we found a way to adjust the campaign. If the effort would have been useless, that campaign would have been cancled a long time ago.

A few other examples would be OneHash and HeatLedger, both terminated campaigns of mine, but also both successful projects (last I checked).
HeatLedger simply had served it's time, the ICO was over and there were little resons to continue a big budget campaign for the coin. We had created a lot of awareness for the ICO though (still doing alright: http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/heat-ledger/).
OneHash was from the beginning designed to be a short, introductory campaign, and when we completed that time, the campaign had been "completed". Today, the site is doing a lot better than before they ran the campaign.

But I guess the campaigns you're after are none of those, you speak of failed coins, so it probably is either Opair or SocialKapital (no offense to the guys involved with those projects).
Both campaigns went alright, at least from my pov, however, with both projects there have been some unrelated problems, things I couldn't influence, besides the task of advertising which I was a part of.
I'm not really keen on discussing those problems in this thread (it's not directly related to the campaigns), but there were certainly other reasons for the projects standing where they are today.
Maybe I'm partly to blame aswell, can't rule it out, but be sure I did the best I could, as I always try to do.

Even though those projects might be considered "failed" by some, I wouldn't call my efforts useless. I ran a nice campaign with each of them and the participants were quite happy about that. In the end, I can't guarantee a projects success via an advertising campaign alone, but if we're talking about the right project, I can certainly help it being successful by running a campaign with them.

A decent amount of my campaigns are escrowed by myself (currently, 3 of 6 are). I usually prefer to run campaigns in this way, as it not only ensures payments, it also eases up the process for both me and the advertiser. Hence my initial suggestion is always to escrow funds with me (or another escrow of their choise).
Some advertisers don't want to do this or can't. The campaigns I run without escrowed funds currently are CryptoGames/CryptoNews and BetKing.
For CG/CN, I've been working together with them for over a year now, I have no doubt they take the campaigns as serious as I am and they will make payments to the point, as they have done in the last 18 months.
BetKing currently is in control of over 6000BTC of users funds invested in their bankroll, I'm not worrying about them misjudging their responsibility for payments either.

That being said, in the end, users know the risk of joining an unescrowed campaign. In case of any payment disputes (/missing funds/missing advertisers/...), I'm going to do my best to make sure everyone gets what they are owed (like I did with opair, if you want to catch up on that), but I can't guarantee it. I would love to, but I can not. There stays a little risk.
So far, I never had to face this situation. I'm pretty sure I won't have to in the future, but never say never (right?).

---

I hope that answers your questions sufficiently.

Congratulations, Sir Lutpin. It is true, he is a great manager and was reputed member of Bitcointalk family from the time I joined.
I have a question in mind, some of the coins, where you worked hard as a campaign manager, are dead or forgotten. Was your effort useless for them? Again, what do you do if a campaign manager refuses to pay you the fees for the members every week?

Hello.

I am fairly new to BitcoinTalk..

I have been active on Crypto-Games for almost 2 months, where Lutpin has the privileged of dealing with us as our Moderator..

Lutpin's Stats for CG are pretty impressive.. I would say that he runs a good campaign.

Friends invited: 1907

I've also browsed the forums and came across Lutpin's Signature campaign.

replies are consistently positive and I would not call this guy a scammer... The attitude is mostly toward people who deserve it. Anybody willing to listen will understand his wisdom..

Campaign Link:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/crypto-gamesnet-signature-campaign-senior-legendaryfull-1082477

I would recommend Lutpin - for what my newbie status is worth..

Lutpin, Great man; You control many campaign simultaneously  ! Good Work !! Best of Luck


Thanks
sayyedraza

Yes, they should be. I've been waiting on graphics, just added them along with the necessary information.
While I try to keep this thread updated and complete as good as possible, there may always be some bit of outdated or missing information.
Once again a shoutout to kaeluxdeuz for providing them

Where is BitBlender signature campaign? Lutpin? That should be in your active campaigns list I believe... BTW Many Congratulation for getting the 2nd most favorite campaign manager spot.

I just share my experience about quality of work from Lutfin, more than 3 weeks i am under management of signature campaign. Everything went fine. Although it is just 3 weeks i have be paid on time and fast respons.