News 3/25/15Stocks are overpriced, overleveraged, headed for trouble Just to provide a little context for the less technically minded market watchers, the CAPE ratio is the ratio of the S&P 500 index to trailing 10-year average earnings. Q-ratio is the market value of nonfinancial corporate equities outstanding divided by net worth, while the Buffett Indicator describes the ratio of corporate-market value to gross national product. All three of those metrics are approaching two standard deviations above historical means, while forward P/E ratios are within historical norms.
--Of course it takes a 1.5-2% drop in the stock market in a single day for people to slightly wake up.
U.S. stocks hammered as fears about quarterly results intensify The carnage on the Street marks the third consecutive losing session, with the S&P 500 and Dow industrials recording the sharpest losses in two weeks and occurred as one of the year’s biggest mergers, a deal between Kraft Foods Group Inc. and H.J. Heinz Co., was announced in the morning.
Analysts attributed the selloff to pre-earnings season jitters and investors cashing out of stocks in companies that have seen big run-ups.
The Nasdaq Composite COMP, -2.37% ended the day down 118.21 points, or 2.4%, at 4,876.52.ost 19.06 points, or 0.9%, to 2,072.44. Biotechnology stocks were hit the hardest, with the iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF IBB, -0.06% dropping 4.1%.
The S&P 500 SPX, -1.46% fell 30.45 points, or 1.5% to 2,061.05, with nine of its 10 main sectors finishing sharply lower. Energy sectors stocks defied the trend and followed a rally in oil prices higher sparked by an intensifying conflict in Yemen.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, -1.62% lost 292.60 points, or 1.6% to 17,718.54, and turned negative for the year. All but two of its 30 components closed lower.
--Long quote but it brings out some key points such as Nasdaq: -2.37% loss, S&P500: 1.46% loss, and investors cashing out of stocks that have recently skyrockted. The market valuation for these companies is incredibly high and most P/E ratios are far greater than the safe "15-20" numbers.
This is nothing like the 2000 dot-com bubble
Should we be worried about another dot-com crash?
After all, the Nasdaq Composite is back up to 5,000 — the giddy level last seen during the peak of the big tech bubble back in 2000.
There are frothy signs everywhere — booming real estate in San Francisco, overnight millionaires with messenger bags, and everyone doing deals.
Everyone’s got “the next Uber,” “the next AirBnB.” Kids with peach fuzz on their cheeks say they’re going to reinvent the world — and investors with billions believe them.
Heavens, even Mark Cuban is calling it madness — and saying it’s worse than last time.
FAA Grants Approval to Outdated Amazon Drones
(3:05)
Is the FAA too slow or is drone technology developing too fast? WSJ’s Jack Nicas reports on Amazon’s next steps in getting its drones approved by the FAA. Photo: DPA/Zuma Press.
Maybe he’s right. Cuban’s a smart guy. And maybe this is all going to end very, very nastily, as it did last time.
But if this is a similar mania, it’s hard to see it in the numbers. Here are three reasons why is this is not the same as it was then.
One: This Nasdaq 5,000 is not that Nasdaq 5,000.
...
But by the numbers we do not seem to be back up to those wild, crazy days. Yet.
--The author actually attempts to provide evidence that we are
not in another dot com bubble and even though he has some points such as the nasdaq being 5000 now isn't the same USD worth of 5000 in year 2000. However, his entire first paragraph talking about all the mania and crazy high valuations just helps to show how wrong he really is. And of course his argument ends very similar to Goldman Sachs response that we are not in a bubble "yet", so that post-crash they can say "hey we knew it was coming, but we weren't in it when we wrote the article"