Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 27610. (Read 26718202 times)

legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
To move back on topic: the walls in Bitcoin lap keep growing 3.5k BTC to $615 now  Undecided
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Why does igorr keep on saying: This user is currently ignored. Anyone?

these people just say it,
but this is obviously not true,They constantly follow me (each my post), and constantly says
(troling, troling ........)
I do not know why these people are obsessed with me.
I'm just brutally realistic.
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
One Token to Move Anything Anywhere
Seriously? They had a fork?

Several...

EDIT: one was planned  Grin
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
Seriously? They had a fork?

Yes because of the master nodes apparently.

The asymmetric design was always a considerable weakness.
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
Seriously? They had a fork?
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
i think that we will have another push up above 600....maybe to 610 or 620, then maybe have a slide down to the 510-530 area before the next massive wave of buying happens. well, thats what i am hoping for anyway!
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
One Token to Move Anything Anywhere
Very unexpected turn of events @DRK coin

Literally no one saw that coming.

Anyone care to explain in a nutshell so I don't have to go and look it up?

legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
Very unexpected turn of events @DRK coin

Literally no one saw that coming.

Anyone care to explain in a nutshell so I don't have to go and look it up?

The price crashed 25% today.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
Very unexpected turn of events @DRK coin

Literally no one saw that coming.

Anyone care to explain in a nutshell so I don't have to go and look it up?
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1031
Very unexpected turn of events @DRK coin

Literally no one saw that coming.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
Why does igorr keep on saying: This user is currently ignored. Anyone?

He is one of our most intelligent users on here. His contributions, brilliant as they are, however tend to move the markets through their sheer relevance and originality in a way that is unpredictable, maybe even dangerous.

It was decided that it would be for the better of all of us lesser users if we are spared the radiating intelligence of his posts, and thus he has been placed on ignore by most. A sacrifice none of us made lightly.

The candle that burns twice as bright...
legendary
Activity: 2242
Merit: 3523
Flippin' burgers since 1163.
Why does igorr keep on saying: This user is currently ignored. Anyone?
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 3056
Welt Am Draht
I've had authenticator problems on only one site before as well. It worked fine on others. In the end I had to get them to remove it and I started again. Do you have the original key that they gave you for it?
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1028
Duelbits.com
Anyone having problems logging into Bitstamp?

It gives me "wrong authentication code" for 10 times before finally accepting it.

Try to sync your authenticator/phone time.

Its only bitstamp, no problems on other sites.


I never sold my shitcoin portfolio Mat


I thought as much. lol.

you could bet on that.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
Anyone having problems logging into Bitstamp?

It gives me "wrong authentication code" for 10 times before finally accepting it.

Try to sync your authenticator/phone time.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
That is not clear...  Addresses with zero balance could be created for many other reasons, such as sprinkling and collecting dirty coins to confuse detectives, stress-testing of wallet software, gambling, pay-out by miner pools, ...  

It's a while ago that I read his methodology, but what you seem to have in mind is actually /creating/ an address, one that is empty though. Correct?

If so, that address would not appear on the blockchain. What gbianchi means (again, iirc) is the /existence/ of empty addresses which necessarily means they a) received an input (thus appearing in the blockchain) and b) were used in an ouput (the "spending" part).

Hence: an empty address on the blockchain implies a transaction took place, and more specifically, one that was not just for "storage" reasons, but also spending the input again (even if, in principle, that spending could be to another storage location)
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
Curioulsy the number of transactions per day and their total BTC volume have increased very little, or not at all, since September last year.  So, either commercial e-payments  are a small fraction of those numbers, or they are not increasing (and their USD volume is actually decreasing, since the BTC price has fallen considerably in that period).
the price has not decreased since September.

Right, sorry for that.  I meant to write that the  USD/BTC price has fallen since Februrary while the total BTC traffic has remained pretty much constant (~600'000 BTC/day).

Jorge, maybe check out this thread regarding transactions and distribution off balances correlated to price
 https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/18-mar-data-a-bitcoin-price-theory-441336
Thanks, interesting information there.

[/quote]
the creation of zero balances implies transactions and spending
[/quote]
That is not clear...  Addresses with zero balance could be created for many other reasons, such as sprinkling and collecting dirty coins to confuse detectives, stress-testing of wallet software, gambling, pay-out by miner pools, ...   
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000

I never sold my shitcoin portfolio Mat


I thought as much. lol.
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1028
Duelbits.com
Anyone having problems logging into Bitstamp?

It gives me "wrong authentication code" for 10 times before finally accepting it.
Jump to: