You're the one supporting centralization, not me. You're just another BUChina sock-puppet.
So anyone who supports BU is a sock puppet and wants China to take over Bitcoin.
Just want to make sure I understand your position.
Do you support centralization, yes or no? If no, how can you justify supporting BU? Please explain this to me.
I don't support centralization.
As I explained in another thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.18064768
Additionally, development is completely centralized when you allow one corporation to dictate their scalability roadmap to the community.
I do not support any proposal that would centralize control of Bitcoin to any entity. I also do not support any proposal that could cause a contentious hardfork threatening to split Bitcoin's blockchain into multiple competing chains. Can you say the same?
FYI: Core Devs are more than just Blockstream.
Its fallacy saying ALL Core Devs are bad because a few work for Blockstream.
I wish you BU supporters would stop with the Blockstream conspiracies and see what is really happening here with China.
It's already under centralized control and by supporting core you are supporting that.
Who published the 'core scalability roadmap'? Greg Maxwell, who is also the CTO and cofounder of Blockstream. Draw your own conclusions.
Sorry but you can't have your cake and eat it too.
You can't avoid contention while at the same time take a stand against entrenchment and centralization, which unfortunately has already crept in.
There you go again with Core = Blockstream, not true but I will tell you what is true, BU = Chinese control.
And let me tell you something else, Satoshi never envisioned centralized mining in China or mega mines with ASICs when he wrote the white paper. He envisioned decentralized mining, with people mining in their homes on PCs. It is an unfortunate flaw of Bitcoin.
