let's get something straight. of course there are some people who misunderstand the title and walk under the cause when what they are doing is totally not feminism. the defenition of being a feminist is wanting equal right is between the sexes.
Equal rights? Then which is the group that calls for being higher than men's rights? I think this is that group.
well you'd be wrong
Feminists publicly claim they are seeking equality, but when you look at the direct results of their acts and their lobbying it is anything but. It is closer to supremacy than equality.
I think true feminists only want equal rights. The trouble is that many women also likely feel resentment for having to fight men for these rights in the first place and that the process is taking far too long, therefore they become radical feminists.
----------------------------------------------
While I do have a problem with these
feminazis (in the article) claiming to be victims of harassment over a simple disagreement, meanwhile it was they who were clearly doing the actual harassing, I think the bigger picture here and what is of far greater significance is that the government is considering the viewpoint that "feeling" (as opposed to actually "being") harassed may be enough to convict someone of criminal harassment.
Thus, feminists in Canada could claim that anyone who disagrees with or offends them is engaging in "criminal harassment" and demand they be sent to prison.
I "feel" like this is some kind of an attempt to create fear among the general public of engaging in controversy and to drum up more laws to quell public dissent. The idea being that people will be less inclined to challenge or have a disagreement with someone (be it a feminist or more likely a government official) if that someone may have you arrested and convicted of criminal harassment by simply
feeling like you are harassing them.
